Supreme court rules Texas abortion providers can sue over ban but won’t stop law

Justices are allowing the law, the strictest such regulation in America to date, to remain in effect

The supreme court ruled on Friday that Texas abortion providers can sue over the state’s ban on most abortions, but the justices are allowing the law, the strictest such regulation in America to date, to remain in effect.

The decision is a mixed result for reproductive health advocates at a time when social conservatives seem on the march in America and the supreme court is leaning towards restricting or outlawing abortion nationally in the future with its conservative supermajority, engineered by Donald Trump.

The Texas law is unusual in that it relies on the public, rather than the authorities, to sue those suspected of performing an abortion or aiding in the service, although not the patient undergoing the termination. The framing of the law was widely seen as a device to make it harder for the abortion ban to be challenged in federal court given the lack of state involvement in enforcing the prohibition.

Friday’s supreme court opinion, written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, gives a complicated legal response that abortion providers in Texas and beyond are likely to receive as a partial but by no means overwhelming victory. In his opinion, Gorsuch makes clear that the court in this case was not addressing the issue of abortion rights per se, or whether the Texas ban was consistent with existing federal law.

Those larger questions will fall to a separate case currently before the supreme court, Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, out of Mississippi, which specifically seeks the overturning of Roe v Wade, the 1973 landmark supreme court ruling that paved the way for legal abortion nationwide.

That case, which could determine the future of abortion rights in the US for decades to come, was heard in oral arguments last week but is unlikely to be concluded until a ruling is issued next June.

The overall result of Friday’s opinion is that abortion providers in Texas will be allowed to press ahead with their legal challenge to the near-total ban on abortion. But their legal path forward has been narrowed and from now on they will be forced to direct their efforts at a small number of state employees.

As part of their challenge to SB 8, abortion clinics had attempted to sue a Texas state judge. That was dismissed unanimously by the nine justices as being inconsistent with a 1908 supreme court ruling that prohibits federal courts imposing injunctions on state courts.

The court ruled by a lesser margin that the providers will be able to continue challenging SB 8 by focusing on four licensing officials who would be involved in taking action against abortion clinics under the terms of the new ban. But state court clerks and the attorney general of Texas, Ken Paxton, who had been named as defendants, could not be sued.

Sonia Sotomayor, one of the three remaining liberal-leaning justices on the nine-judge supreme court bench, expressed strong views in dissent.

She said that by casting their opinion so narrowly, the conservative majority was “shrinking” from its duty to defend the supremacy of the US constitution over the whims of individual states.

“The court should have put an end to this madness months ago, before SB 8 went into effect,” she wrote in a dissenting opinion. “It failed to do so then, and it fails again today … Federal courts can and should issue relief when a state enacts a law that chills the exercise of a constitutional right.”

The legal battle to try and stop SB 8 and reopen access to abortion to millions of Texan women will now return to a lower federal court in the state capital, Austin. While it does so, however, the prohibition against almost all abortions in the state will continue to stand.

Massachusetts Democratic senator and former presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren said the Friday decision in the Texas case was outrageous.

“While Scotus has allowed challenges to SB 8 to proceed, it’s outrageous that the Court has again decided not to block Texas’ unconstitutional abortion ban,” tweeted Warren. “More Texans are harmed every day this law is allowed to stand. The Senate must pass the Women’s Health Protection Act.”

The law would codify the right to abortion access in the US into national legislation. The bill passed the House in September and is in limbo in the US Senate.

Also on Friday, the court dismissed an overall challenge to the Texas law from the Biden administration that would have blocked the ban entirely.

The law in Texas has been in effect since September, aside from a district court-ordered pause that lasted 48 hours. It bans abortions once cardiac activity is detected, usually around six weeks and before many women know they are pregnant.

While courts have blocked other state laws effectively banning abortion before a fetus can survive outside the womb, the Texas law has so far avoided a similar fate because it leaves enforcement up to private citizens, a move that many critics have said effectively creates anti-abortion bounty hunters.

The law allows anyone, anywhere to bring a suit against anyone who helps a woman obtain an abortion, and provides a $10,000 penalty against defendants found to violate the law.

Meanwhile, a judge in Texas had ruled on Thursday that the law violated the state’s constitution because it allows private citizens to sue abortion providers.

State district court judge David Peeples was ruling on the law but abortion providers had already signaled that despite the ruling, they were unlikely to resume the procedure until the supreme court announced its decision.

Contributors

Jessica Glenza, Ed Pilkington, Gloria Oladipo and agencies

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Idaho asks supreme court to decide on law penalizing abortion providers
At issue is a court ruling that the state’s abortion ban conflicts with government rules mandating the provision of emergency care

Carter Sherman

30, Nov, 2023 @11:00 AM

Article image
Supreme court appears open to allowing challenge to Texas abortion law
Justices, in oral arguments, seem skeptical of law that gives private citizens right to sue to enforce six-week abortion ban

Jessica Glenza

01, Nov, 2021 @9:07 PM

Article image
Texas abortion providers ask supreme court to halt unprecedented abortion law
Center for Reproductive Rights and Planned Parenthood turn to justices in final bid to block near-total ban

Mary Tuma

30, Aug, 2021 @8:05 PM

Article image
US supreme court agrees to consider abortion pill access
Case will determine future of mifepristone in first major abortion issue to reach country’s highest court since it overturned Roe

Carter Sherman

13, Dec, 2023 @5:22 PM

Article image
Conservative US supreme court justices signal support for restricting abortion in pivotal case
Case poses a direct threat to the legal underpinnings of the landmark 1973 Roe v Wade ruling that guaranteed the constitutional right to abortion

Jessica Glenza

01, Dec, 2021 @6:56 PM

Article image
Sarah Weddington, attorney who won Roe v Wade abortion case, dies aged 76
Texan lawyer and Linda Coffee won landmark 1973 case, safeguarding right now under threat from US supreme court

Martin Pengelly in New York

27, Dec, 2021 @1:49 PM

Article image
Texas doctor protests abortion law by admitting he carried out procedure
Alan Braid writes column for Washington Post describing the hardships and deaths he has witnessed among patients

Martin Pengelly in New York

19, Sep, 2021 @12:13 PM

Article image
Texas sheriff says he ‘will not persecute’ those seeking an abortion
Javier Salazar posted on Facebook that he would not use his power to ‘impose the morals’ of others on those ‘exercising a right’

Erum Salam

29, Jun, 2022 @9:00 AM

Article image
Protesters rush to supreme court to decry draft abortion ruling ‘disgrace’
Pro-choice campaigners light candles and vent fury at Justice Alito, author of leaked opinion, as anti-abortion activists celebrate

Lauren Burke in Washington and Oliver Milman and Gloria Oladipo in New York

03, May, 2022 @4:53 PM

Article image
US supreme court overturns abortion rights, upending Roe v Wade
Biden calls ruling in pivotal case Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization ‘a tragic error’

Jessica Glenza and Martin Pengelly in New York, and Sam Levin in Los Angeles

24, Jun, 2022 @6:03 PM