While Labour will be desperate to push the NHS to the centre of the general election campaign, and the Liberal Democrats will be emphasising their commitment to mental health services, it is the six regional mayors being elected for the first time in May who could provide the biggest surprise when it comes to health policies.

The exact powers of the six – covering Tees Valley, Greater Manchester, Liverpool city region, West Midlands, West of England and Cambridgeshire & Peterborough – vary depending on the deal each region reached with the government, but none of them will control the NHS.

However, like any self-respecting local politician, the candidates are not allowing the limits of their formal powers to deter them from trying to influence such an important policy area.

The manifesto of Andy Burnham, Labour’s candidate for mayor of Greater Manchester, typifies the influence mayors intend to wield. Burnham wants to cut waiting times for child and adolescent mental health services, manage the transition from child to adult mental health services more effectively, have a plan to get local people into NHS jobs, provide more incentives for services to shift from treatment to prevention, and “introduce in Greater Manchester the country’s first fully-integrated National Health and Care Service, building on the work that is already ongoing”.

This tone of his promise on integration implies a clear leadership role for the mayor in health and care policy, well beyond their formal position as just one of many members of the region’s health board.

With these devolved health powers, the temptation for Manchester’s mayor to get involved in broader NHS policy will be irresistible – especially if the winning candidate used to be health secretary. The city region is likely to become the test of how much power regional mayors can exert over health.

If the mayor emerges as a driving force for the region’s ambitious health devolution plans – perhaps acting as a broker in disputes and providing reassurance to the public over service changes – then the NHS may begin to see advantages in metro mayors having a more formal role in local health plans. But NHS England will be wary of anything that reduces its firm, if usually discreet, grip on the Manchester experiment.

In the other regions, amid inevitable controversies over sustainability and transformation partnership (STP) plans to move and close services, a metro mayor’s intervention could prove decisive in influencing public opinion. Free of the requirement to make the tough choices, mayors could become a rallying point for public dissatisfaction with local health services.

The implications of this could be far-reaching. Mayors could easily derail STP plans without any obligation to provide a coherent alternative. This could leave NHS leaders in the position of having to either rein in radical changes essential to long-term clinical and financial sustainability, or force through unpopular plans and stand accused of damaging services.

Exerting power without assuming responsibility would be the worst outcome for the NHS from the introduction of metro mayors. STP leaders need to make sure this does not happen. They need to recognise the importance of these new powerbrokers and engage with them quickly and openly. That means listening as well as telling.

It is an opportunity to involve them in key aspects of STP plans, such as tackling the root causes of health inequality and improving mental health with the help of major local employers.

NHS England and NHS Improvement will also have to make some accommodation with this new political reality. They have an important role in ensuring mayors understand the context in which STP plans have been put together, the guidance that local leaders are having to follow, and what clinical and financial sustainability looks like.

Whatever the devolution deals signed with the government say, the NHS will have six new leaders on 5 May.

Join the Healthcare Professionals Network to read more pieces like this. And follow us on Twitter (@GdnHealthcare) to keep up with the latest healthcare news and views.


Richard Vize

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
DevoManc anniversary gives little cause for celebration | Andrew Harrop
Giving local services control over NHS spending was meant to bring power to the people but residents in Greater Manchester are oblivious

Andrew Harrop

01, Apr, 2017 @8:05 AM

Article image
Manchester health devolution gives local leaders the chance do better than Hunt and Osborne
The devo-health agenda contains risks, but also offers the opportunity to drive through essential public services reform to tackle the region’s social problems

Harry Quilter-Pinner

01, Apr, 2016 @10:49 AM

Article image
Councils must play a more pivotal role in health and care integration
Integration should be an equal partnership between the NHS and local authorities – these eight solutions will help

Roy Perry

04, Jul, 2016 @11:03 AM

Article image
Election 2015: what are the parties pledging for the NHS? - Interactive
Thinktank the King’s Fund has analysed the health policies in the main parties’ manifestos. This interactive shows what the parties are promising for health and social care in England

05, May, 2015 @8:57 AM

Article image
What do the party manifestos mean for the NHS? | Richard Vize
So far the election campaign has been helpful to the NHS, but the three main parties’ plans would all leave a significant funding gap

Richard Vize

19, May, 2017 @10:19 AM

Article image
NHS transformation plans are beset by infighting
Negotiations on reforms must be built on trust, otherwise there is little chance of escaping the relentless cycle of crisis management and short-term fixes

Richard Vize

20, Jan, 2017 @12:04 PM

Article image
How integrated working is helping Margate improve mental wellbeing | Paul Burstow
Task force works together to tackle health inequalities and improve access to education, work and skills, writes Paul Burstow

Paul Burstow

27, Nov, 2014 @11:29 AM

Article image
Jeremy Hunt has repeatedly failed to meet pledges on mental health care
Latest funding announcement is too little, too late. Failure to prioritise and ringfence mental health resources has led to a crisis in provision

Kailash Chand and JS Bamrah

01, Aug, 2017 @10:52 AM

Article image
The squeezed NHS is responding to difficult times by innovating
Our report on the state of the health service paints a gloomy picture — but also highlights providers’ resilience and ingenuity

Saffron Cordery

29, Nov, 2016 @10:12 AM

Article image
How can health and care integration help people living with dementia?
Join us on Thursday 14 May between midday and 2pm to discuss how integrated services can improve dementia care

Sarah Johnson

12, May, 2015 @10:10 AM