Mining giant Glencore faces human rights complaint over toxic spill in Chad

Dozens of villagers, including children, claim they suffered severe burns and sickness after contact with contaminated water

The UK government has accepted a human rights complaint against mining and commodities giant Glencore regarding a toxic wastewater spill in Chad, where dozens of villagers – among them children – claim they suffered severe burns, skin lesions and sickness after contact with contaminated water.

The complaint, brought by three human rights groups on behalf of affected communities, alleges environmental abuses and social engagement failures by the FTSE-100 company in relation to two spillages, the wastewater spill and an alleged oil spill, both in 2018.

Officials at the Department for International Trade, which monitors whether UK-based companies implement OECD guidelines for responsible business, decided the issues raised “merit[ed] further examination”. This case marks the first time that Glencore has faced an OECD complaint in the UK.

In September 2018, a wastewater basin holding a crude oil by-product collapsed at Glencore UK’s operations in Badila, southern Chad. Some 85m litres of runoff – equivalent in volume to 34 Olympic-sized swimming pools – flooded fields and the local river, which local people use for drinking, bathing and washing.

At least 50 people reported burns, skin lesions, sickness and diarrhoea after bathing in or using the contaminated river water in the weeks after the leak. Many of those harmed were children, some of whom were admitted to hospital. One 13-year-old boy was unable to move his body for a year after swimming in the river, which doctors attributed to the “crude oil burns”. Livestock drinking from the river also died, according to the complaint.

Residents claim the wastewater basin had been leaking for weeks before it collapsed, but Glencore failed to properly address the problem or to warn local residents about the impending danger. They also say Glencore has still not acknowledged the harm caused or provided remedy. A few weeks after the wastewater incident, residents also reported an oil pipe leak, which is contested by the company.

“The UK’s decision to accept the complaint provides an opportunity for those harmed at Glencore’s operations to finally be heard and to find remedy for the harms they suffered,” said Anneke Van Woudenberg, executive director of the human rights group Rights and Accountability in Development (Raid), which was among the groups that filed the complaint. Raid published a detailed report about the alleged abuses in March last year.

“For more than a year we have tried, along with organisations in Chad, to get Glencore UK to appropriately investigate these claims and to compensate those affected. And although they’ve made promises, none of them have resulted in any remedy, nor has there been an independent investigation into what happened. This is why we launched the complaint.

“No community, whether they are in a remote area of Chad or elsewhere, should have to wait more than two and a half years for a company to investigate whether its toxic spill caused injury, especially when it involves so many children.”

The National Contact Point (NCP), the UK body which oversees the implementation of OECD guidelines for multinational companies, will now mediate between the parties. If that fails, the NCP will examine whether the violations highlighted by the human rights groups occurred and will publish its findings.

In a statement to the Guardian, Glencore said: “Glencore has participated in the UK NCP’s initial assessment of the complaint and acknowledges their decision that the issues relating to the 2018 wastewater incident merit further examination.

“We also note that UK NCP’s decision to further examine aspects of the complaint is not a finding against Glencore UK or a determination by the UK NCP that Glencore UK has acted inconsistently with the guidelines.

“Glencore is committed to operating in a safe and responsible manner in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. We actively manage and mitigate any impacts our operations may have on local communities and the environment. We recognise that our presence can deliver sustainable benefits to those living around our operations and to the national economy of Chad. We transparently report on our performance and welcome the opportunity to build and strengthen relationships with civil society representatives.”

Contributor

Kate Hodal

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Mining giant Glencore accused in child labour and acid dumping row

London-listed company denies polluting river in Congo and profiting from children working underground

John Sweeney

14, Apr, 2012 @6:00 PM

Article image
BP faces new fines over second Alaska spill
Oil giant BP 'failed to respond to alarms' and had suffered burst pipelines since 2001, Anchorage court told

Edward Helmore in New York

20, Nov, 2010 @1:21 AM

Article image
Ogoni king: Shell oil is killing my people
King Emere was in a London court last week for the case that he hopes will allow him to sue Shell in the UK for polluting his tribal land

John Vidal

03, Dec, 2016 @7:45 PM

Article image
‘We cannot drink oil’: campaigners condemn east African pipeline
Activists say the ‘heart of Africa’ line shipping crude from Uganda to Tanzania is unnecessary and poses a huge environmental risk

Samuel Okiror in Kampala

14, Apr, 2021 @11:15 AM

Article image
BP faces further $2.5bn charge over Deepwater Horizon spill
Oil company has paid out more than $60bn in liabilities over environmental disaster that still threatens wildlife and ecology around Gulf of Mexico

Terry Macalister

14, Jul, 2016 @5:54 PM

Article image
Shell attacked over four-year delay in Niger delta oil spill clean-up

Energy firm's attempts to clear pollution resulting from two large spills in 2008 described as 'amateurish' by assessors

John Vidal, environment editor

22, Sep, 2012 @11:01 PM

Article image
Shell accepts liability for two oil spills in Nigeria

Oil giant faces a bill of hundreds of millions of dollars following class action suit brought on behalf of communities in Bodo, Ogoniland

John Vidal in Bodo

03, Aug, 2011 @10:07 AM

Article image
Shell oil spills in the Niger delta - in pictures

Shell has accepted liability for two massive oil spills that have had severe consequences for the economy, health and development of the community of Bodo in Nigeria

03, Aug, 2011 @2:31 PM

Article image
Niger delta oil spills clean-up will take 30 years, says UN

A succession of oil spills by Shell and other companies over half a century will cost $1bn to clean up, according to a major report

John Vidal, environment editor

04, Aug, 2011 @6:54 PM

Article image
Mining firms face scrutiny over Congo deals

Campaigners argue natural resources exploited to benefit multinationals rather than local population

Simon Goodley and Julian Borger

08, May, 2012 @9:28 PM