Coca-Cola vows to axe suppliers guilty of land grabbing

Drinks firm announces zero-tolerance policy and encourages other companies to follow UN's responsible governance rules

Coca-Cola has said it will cut off suppliers that do not follow guidelines to protect the land rights of local communities in developing countries.

The soft drinks company also pledged to use its clout to encourage other food and beverage firms, traders – especially of soy, sugar and palm oil – as well as governments to endorse and implement voluntary UN guidelines on responsible governance of tenure on land, fisheries and forests.

"The Coca-Cola company believes that land grabbing is unacceptable," it said. "Our company does not typically purchase ingredients directly from farms, nor are we owners of sugar farms or plantations, but as a major buyer of sugar, we acknowledge our responsibility to take action and to use our influence to help protect the land rights of local communities."

Coca-Cola, based in Atlanta, Georgia, said it would conduct third-party social, environmental and human rights assessments beginning in Brazil, Colombia, Guatemala, India, Philippines, Thailand and South Africa, critical sourcing regions for the company.

These countries are among the top 16 from which Coca-Cola sources cane sugar. Six of these countries have been identified with human rights violations by the US department of labour. The assessments will begin this year with Colombia and Guatemala and will cover the other 14 countries by 2020.

Sugar is a key ingredient for food and drinks firms: 51% of sugar produced ends up in processed foods including soft drinks, sweets and ice-cream. It uses the most land for food production – sugar is grown on 31m hectares, an area the size of Italy. There have been 100 recorded large-scale land deals for sugar production occupying at least 4m hectares (11m acres) of land since 2000, according the charity Oxfam.

Coke's action plan followed an Oxfam report in October, Sugar Rush, which said sugar, along with soy and palm oil, was driving large-scale land acquisitions and land conflicts at the expense of small-scale food producers and their families.

In 2011, the global trade in raw sugar was worth $47bn (£29bn). Of that $33.5bn of exports came from developing countries. Yet in spite of the risks of land conflicts associated with sugar, soy and palm oil production, a lack of transparency by food and beverage giants makes it difficult for the public to hold companies accountable, Oxfam said in its report.

Coca-Cola disclosed that its top cane sugar countries were Brazil, Mexico, India and named its top three company suppliers as Copersucar (Brazil), Mitr Phol (Thailand), and Dangote (Nigeria).

Pledging to crack down on suppliers that do not adhere to relevant supplier guiding principles (SGP), Coca-Cola said: "If a supplier fails to uphold any aspect of the SGP requirements, the Coca-Cola company will work with the supplier on corrective action. If such action is not taken, the supplier relationship will be terminated."

Coca-Cola plans to implement zero-tolerance strategy for land grabs through adherence the principle of free, prior and informed consent across its operations (including bottling partners) and will require its suppliers to adhere to this principle. The company said it would recognise and safeguard the rights of communities and traditional peoples to maintain access to land and natural resources.

Oxfam, which has urged Coca-Cola, PepsiCo and Associated British Foods to adopt a zero-tolerance policy on land grabs, welcomed Coca-Cola's move as setting a new standard for commitments in the food and beverage industry.

"Coca-Cola's leadership in declaring zero tolerance for land grabs is a vital first step," said Penny Fowler, head of private sector advocacy. "We look forward to tracking the actions the company takes to follow through on their promises. In particular we will continue to advocate, along with local partners, for appropriate resolution for the communities in Brazil and Cambodia who continue to struggle to regain the rights to their land. The ball is now in PepsiCo and ABF's court to follow suit."

Business and human rights experts said Coke's commitment on land grabs represented a significant step towards respecting human rights.

"While Coca-Cola does not own or control sugar farms, it is a major buyer of sugar around the world," said Salil Tripathi, director at the Institute for Human Rights and Business in London. "If sugar comes from a farm where land has been acquired with force, or after paying insufficient compensation to customary owners, then the farm becomes tainted, and the sugar turns bitter. Companies like Coca-Cola are in a position to influence better human rights outcomes because of their sheer size. Other companies – large and small – should continue on this path."

Coca-Cola has been accused in the past of drying up farmers' wells and destroying local agriculture in pursuit of water resources to feed its plants. There have been particularly bitter disputes in India. Coca-Cola's operations rely on access to vast supplies of water, as it takes almost three litres to make one litre of Coca-Cola.


Mark Tran

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Indian traders boycott Coca-Cola for 'straining water resources'
Campaigners in drought-hit Tamil Nadu say it is unsustainable to use 400 litres of water to make a 1 litre fizzy drink

Vidhi Doshi in Mumbai

01, Mar, 2017 @2:57 PM

Article image
PepsiCo takes on Coca-Cola with Latin American water plan
Unlike its US rival, PepsiCo promises to return water to the watershed from which it was taken in countries including Mexico, Brazil, Colombia and Guatemala

Alison Moodie

22, Dec, 2016 @8:00 AM

Article image
Food and drink firms urged to crack down on sugar 'land grabs'
Demand for sugar is triggering land conflicts, says Oxfam, as it calls on Coca-Cola and other major firms to have zero tolerance

Mark Tran

02, Oct, 2013 @9:44 AM

Article image
Coca-Cola accused of propping up notorious Swaziland dictator

Swaziland's King Mswati III accused by activists of human rights abuses and of looting national wealth

David Smith in Johannesburg

02, Jan, 2012 @1:51 PM

Article image
Ways to step up the fight against global antimicrobial resistance | Letters
Letters: Decision-makers must acknowledge the pivotal role that water, sanitation and hygiene play in preventing infection, writes WaterAid’s Margaret Batty. Meanwhile Matt Ball of the The Good Food Institute says moving to plant-based and clean meat is the best thing we can do to avoid pandemics of antibiotic-resistant superbugs


29, Mar, 2018 @5:02 PM

Article image
Coca-Cola country in southern Mexico – photo essay
Photographer Diana Bagnoli finds out how Coke has become a key part of indigenous ceremonies and a staple source of hydration

Jo Tuckman Photography by Diana Bagnoli

15, Nov, 2019 @7:00 AM

Article image
More than 1,700 environmental activists murdered in the past decade – report
Figures likely to be an underestimate, says Global Witness, as land defenders are killed by hitmen, crime groups and governments

Patrick Greenfield

28, Sep, 2022 @11:01 PM

Article image
European Union agrees to investigate Cambodian sugar industry
Booming industry faces allegations of human rights abuses such as land grabs, forced displacement and child labour

Kate Hodal in Phnom Penh

10, Dec, 2014 @2:40 PM

Article image
'It was too hot, even to leave home': stories from the world's hottest year
From drought-hit Nigeria to wine-growing Finland, we hear from people whose lives have already been changed by a warming world

Patrick Kingsley, John Vidal, Oliver Milman, Michael Slezak, Vidhi Doshi, David Crouch, Oliver Holmes, Jonathan Watts, Shaun Walker

14, Nov, 2016 @12:03 PM

Article image
Indigenous peoples face rise in rights abuses during pandemic, report finds
Increasing land grabs endangering forest communities and wildlife as governments expand mining and agriculture to combat economic impact of Covid

Patrick Greenfield

18, Feb, 2021 @3:00 PM