Jack Grealish ruling in FA Cup final further proves absurdity of handball | Jonathan Wilson

Jack Grealish was penalised for inadvertently touching the ball with his fingers, giving United the chance to equalise

As it turned out, it didn’t affect the destination of the FA Cup or deny Manchester City a chance at the treble, but it might have done. Manchester United had created very little when suddenly VAR gave them a penalty for something almost nobody appealed. Assuredly, under the laws, as they are now interpreted, the decision was correct. Jack Grealish’s hand was raised almost to shoulder height as Aaron Wan-Bissaka’s header struck it, and that these days is an offence. But really, why should it be?

Why should games be decided not by skill or heart, by organisation or improvisation, but by 75% chances of a goal handed out because of random bounces and bobbles? Grealish was not cheating. He did not seek to gain an advantage. He just jumped and, in twisting to see where the ball went, his arm went out to balance him. This wasn’t a Peter Schmeichel-style star jump, spreading himself to make a block; it was just a man jumping, his arms doing what arms do when somebody jumps.

This is not just an issue of the Cup final, but these big one-off games do draw the focus. This is a time to reiterate that this is ludicrous. It’s as though with the power of VAR to examine what would usually exist beyond the cognitive powers of a referee that the International Football Association Board (Ifab) has decided to ask not whether anybody has deliberately tried to gain an illicit advantage but whether anything has happened for which a penalty could be given. The result is a wilfully and illogically cruel and unfair environment; it’s as though somebody put Theresa May in charge of handball.

The English interpretation is less stringent than in Europe. Take the second leg of City’s Champions League quarter-final against Bayern Munich in which both sides were awarded a penalty: City for a shot that struck Dayot Upamecano as he moved to block a Grealish shot and Bayern for a Sadio Mané cross that hit Manuel Akanji’s arm. In neither case was there an attempt to cheat; Upamecano was especially unlucky in that he had had his arms behind his back, only for his left arm to stray slightly away from his ribs as he closed Grealish down.

Even that sentence suggests how absurd handball has become: why would any sport want players to have to adopt a wholly unnatural and unhelpful posture when performing a basic element of the game to try to minimise their chances of being penalised? But VAR loves this because a ball striking the arm is less subjective than a shoulder-to-shoulder tussle or a tackle that might be fractionally mistimed or over-aggressive. There is the ball, there is the arm, there is contact between the two, therefore referees can do something.

Paul Tierney reviews the incident on the VAR monitor.
Paul Tierney reviews the incident on the VAR monitor. Photograph: Shaun Botterill/Getty Images

It has been suggested that penalties are too common anyway, that football is far too keen to hand out free shots at goal for minor infractions. Perhaps, the argument runs, an indirect free-kick would be a more appropriate sanction for that sort of offence, or for a non-deliberate handball. The rise of xG means that we can say with some certainty that a nudge in the back in the corner of the box does not equate to the 0.75 of a goal a penalty equates to. But there are knock-on effects here: it benefits the flow of the game if defenders are cautious about making challenges in the box. A penalty for a foul in the box is not only about compensation but about deterrence. Handball is different because a player can choose not to make a challenge, but barring extremely invasive and probably inadvisable surgery, he can’t choose not to have arms.

By the laws of the game (as opposed to their interpretation), handball is only an offence if it is deliberate, if it is in the act of scoring or the immediate build-up to a goal or if a player “has made their body unnaturally bigger”. The phrasing of that latter point has drawn some mockery, but it’s obvious what is meant. There is a huge (and fairly obvious) difference, though, between a player spreading himself to make a block and his arm going up to balance himself.

There is another argument that, for the sake of clarity, all handballs should be fouls, but referees make subjective calls all time: why should handball be any different? There will be grey areas, but there always are. Some players would still end up being penalised for a stray and unintended arm. But far rather some than most. It’s surely not beyond the wit of referees to make some kind of assessment of whether there has been a deliberate attempt to cheat or whether the ball has just hit the arm.

Just because the technology exists, there’s no need to go looking for offences. Referees are there ultimately so the game may exist in a playable form; they are not vengeful priests administering immutable divine law.


Jonathan Wilson

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Copenhagen comeback floors 10-man Manchester United after Rashford red
Manchester United threw away a two-goal lead and ended up losing 4-3 at Copenhagen to go bottom of their Champions League group

Jamie Jackson at Parken Stadium

08, Nov, 2023 @10:17 PM

Article image
VAR furore at Tottenham and Atlético a sign of what football has lost | Luke McLaughlin
In obsessing over the minutiae of refereeing, the game has sacrificed its spontaneity, narrative coherence and sense of fun

Luke McLaughlin

27, Oct, 2022 @2:32 PM

Article image
To be seen and not heard is keeping fans and viewers in the dark over VAR | Barry Glendenning
The marathon wait for a VAR check at Arsenal could have been tolerable if we could have listened in

Barry Glendenning

25, Apr, 2022 @7:00 AM

Article image
Howard Webb suggests rule change so VAR can reverse decisions after errors
Howard Webb has acknowledged ‘disappointment’ from the PGMOL at the errors that led to VAR denying Liverpool a legitimate goal at Tottenham

Paul MacInnes

10, Oct, 2023 @8:55 PM

Article image
‘That’s 365 a year’: Ange Postecoglou cautions against replays after mistakes
The Tottenham manager has said replaying game against Liverpool would set a dangerous precedent and believes VAR should be scrapped

Jacob Steinberg

06, Oct, 2023 @9:30 PM

Article image
VAR’s failings threaten to plunge Premier League into mire of dark conspiracies | John Brewin
What happened at Tottenham on Saturday only further erodes trust in referees in this country, which could badly damage the game

John Brewin

01, Oct, 2023 @7:00 PM

Article image
Howard Webb urges VAR officials to intervene more often on soft penalties
VAR officials have been asked to encourage referees to review decisions involving minimal contact even if an error is not ‘clear and obvious’

Paul MacInnes

22, Nov, 2023 @6:01 PM

Article image
It’ll always be VARsonists v eVARngelists but TV tell-all is a positive step | Max Rushden
Football isn’t meant to be perfect – perhaps Match Officials: Mic’d Up can help us towards a touch of sympathy for officials

Max Rushden

07, Sep, 2023 @12:00 PM

Article image
Communicate, educate, invest and push back: the VAR blueprint for football | Paul MacInnes
New measures need to be brought in by the referees’ body to ensure major errors such as Luis Díaz’s disallowed goal at Spurs are not repeated

Paul MacInnes

02, Oct, 2023 @7:06 PM

Article image
Sin-bins to be trialled at higher levels of football after grassroots success
The use of sin-bins is to be expanded in football, part of a series of measures designed to help protect referees from abuse

Paul MacInnes

28, Nov, 2023 @3:52 PM