Jonás Gutiérrez wins case against Newcastle over cancer treatment

Tribunal rules football club discriminated against midfielder by stopping his selection to avoid extending contract

The former Newcastle United midfielder Jonás Gutiérrez has won a disability discrimination claim against the club after being dropped as a result of his battle with testicular cancer.

Gutiérrez sued the Premier League club after managers told him he would no longer feature in the club’s future just two months after he had surgery.

The midfielder said the club did not play him after that so that he did not reach the 80 games needed to trigger a one-year extension of his contract. He was released by Newcastle last summer when his contract expired.

An employment tribunal has found in his favour in two of four claims and Gutiérrez could receive up to £2m in compensation. In its ruling, the tribunal said: “We find as a fact therefore that the respondent was deliberately managing the claimant’s selection to prevent him triggering the option [of extension].

“We concluded that the reason why the respondent managed the claimant’s selection was because they had no longer wanted him at the club because of his cancer.”

Previously considered one of the most valuable players in the first team squad, Gutiérrez said he was shocked at the “sudden change of heart” towards him.

He told the Birmingham tribunal: “I think they feared that my illness would mean that I could no longer play at the highest level and they considered me to be a liability rather than an asset to the club.

“I got the impression that they thought I couldn’t be the same player again after such an illness or that I would be bound to have lingering effects [or] other episodes of illness off the back of it.

“This caused me a lot of distress given my hard work and commitment for the club in the preceding five and half years.”

During the tribunal, Gutiérrez, who now plays for the Spanish club Deportivo La Coruña and gave evidence via a Spanish interpreter, said he was still distressed by the club’s decision and was having weekly counselling sessions. In heated exchanges with Newcastle’s lawyer during cross-examination, he broke down in tears.

The midfielder was diagnosed with cancer in October 2013, about six months after he first noticed pain in his left testicle.

Worried at the length of time it had taken for his tumour to be diagnosed in the UK, Gutiérrez decided to have his treatment in his home country of Argentina, where he had his testicle removed before returning to play for Newcastle two weeks later in November 2013.

He has previously stated that he paid for his own treatment and he felt that the club had treated him poorly after his recovery.

He said: “It is notable that during my chemotherapy treatment, neither the manager, Alan Pardew, or any club directors contacted me to see how I was feeling or to congratulate me on my recovery.”

During the tribunal, it was revealed that Gutiérrez’s mother, who was his manager, had contemplated suicide after her son was “thrown out like a bad dog” following his cancer diagnosis.

Monica Montore said: “I was so distressed at what they had done to Jonás that I just wanted to take my own life at the club’s door. I was going to leave a letter to say what a terrible way they had treated Jonás.

“He returns from his operation to have lost a testicle – from a hit on Newcastle’s pitch … he returns from that operation and they throw him out like a bad dog.”

During cross-examination, Newcastle’s lawyer, Sean Jones, claimed Gutiérrez was “just in it for the money”. The player denied this and, amid increasingly heated exchanges, became visibly emotional before leaving the court crying.

“I am not here for the money,” he said. “I want to do this for all people who have problems with their employers.” In a statement, Newcastle United said: “We recognise that the task facing the tribunal was a difficult one, but we are dismayed by its decision. We will now take time to consider the judgment in full and consult with our legal team to understand the options available to us.”

Martin Budworth, a barrister at Kings Chambers, who represented Gutiérrez, said: “It is very gratifying to have been able to help Mr Gutiérrez in fighting for these findings especially when the club said his claims were ludicrous. The tribunal has made it clear that a Premier League football club owes the same duties to a disabled person as any other employer.”

Carol Couse, a sports law expert from UK law firm Mills & Reeve, who was the instructing solicitor in the case and attended every day of the tribunal alongside Gutiérrez, said: “As he alleged, it has been determined by the tribunal that the Newcastle United board influenced team selection to prevent Jonas reaching the contractual trigger point to secure an extension to his contract and the evidence of Newcastle officials and ex-officials has been discredited. He wishes to place on record his thanks to all the Newcastle fans who have supported him throughout his case.”

Gutiérrez launched his claim under the Equality Act 2010, which makes it unlawful to discriminate against workers because of mental or physical disability, and considers a cancer diagnosis to be a disability.

Further claims of unfavourable treatment and another of harassment related to disability were dismissed. A further hearing will decide the amount of compensation the player will receive.


Nazia Parveen North of England correspondent

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Dyslexic employee wins discrimination case against Starbucks
Campaigners say tribunal finding in favour of Meseret Kumulchew highlights duty to make allowances for dyslexic staff

Matthew Weaver

09, Feb, 2016 @9:48 AM

Article image
Judges win pensions discrimination claim against MoJ
More than 200 judges whose entitlements were cut argued they suffered age, gender and race discrimination

Owen Bowcott Legal affairs correspondent

16, Jan, 2017 @1:54 PM

Article image
Widow sues DPD over courier husband's death
Wife says Don Lane missed hospital appointments for fear of being charged £150

Robert Booth Social affairs correspondent

13, Sep, 2018 @5:46 PM

Article image
Maya Forstater was discriminated against over gender-critical beliefs, tribunal rules
Researcher lost job at thinktank after tweeting that transgender women could not change their biological sex

Haroon Siddique Legal affairs correspondent

06, Jul, 2022 @3:27 PM

Article image
Disabled worker wins case for wrongful dismissal against Abercrombie & Fitch

Student who accused US retail giant of 'hiding' her in stockroom is awarded £9,000 in damages

Alexandra Topping

13, Aug, 2009 @8:42 PM

Article image
Addison Lee wrongly classed drivers as self-employed, tribunal rules
Verdict in test case brought by three drivers against minicab firm could lead to wave of claims for unpaid wages and holiday pay

Robert Booth

25, Sep, 2017 @3:35 PM

Article image
Ethical veganism is a belief protected by law, tribunal rules
Man sacked by League Against Cruel Sports told he is entitled to equality protections

Damien Gayle

03, Jan, 2020 @2:12 PM

Article image
Deliveroo workers' contracts ban access to employment tribunals
Delivery firm tells its self-employed couriers they cannot go to court to be recognised as staff with more rights

Hilary Osborne

25, Jul, 2016 @6:00 AM

Article image
UK workers are cheated out of at least £1.5bn a year in holiday pay
One in 20 does not get statutory holiday pay, one in 12 does not get payslip and £1.2bn in wages are unpaid annually, says study

Felicity Lawrence

19, Jun, 2017 @3:07 PM

Article image
Court rules Addison Lee drivers are workers, not self-employed
Drivers are entitled to national minimum wage and paid holiday, tribunal finds

Robert Booth Social affairs correspondent

14, Nov, 2018 @12:29 PM