Can Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore work some magic on the wizarding world?

Part three of the Harry Potter prequel series had better have some good tricks up its sleeve or the future of this tarnished franchise will be in doubt

The news this week that the latest instalment in the Fantastic Beasts saga will be titled The Secrets of Dumbledore has been met with a chorus of meh across the geekosphere. The general consensus seems to be that after 2018’s misfiring sequel, The Crimes of Grindelwald, these magical mysteries better be up there with the recipe for KFC if Warner Bros want fans to tune back in for part three.

It’s a pity, because JK Rowling’s venture into fantasy screenwriting promised so much. Freed from the structures of her Harry Potter novels, with their Malory Towers on magical Kool-Aid veneer, she wrote an opener, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, that offered an enticing vision of the wizarding world’s recent history. Even the Crimes of Grindelwald, for all its muddled, often strangely meaningless plotting and messy characterisation, boasted an enduring sorcerous sparkle.

But with the various off-screen travails endured by both Rowling and star Johnny Depp in the intervening period, as well as the saga’s on-screen slump, the shine has rather rubbed off this particular golden snitch. The Secrets of Dumbledore, in which Depp will be replaced as Grindelwald by Mads Mikkelsen, really needs to take home the Quidditch Cup if the proposed five-film series is not to be cut unceremoniously short.

What could the secrets of the title be? We already know – because Rowling told us more than a decade ago – that Dumbledore (played by Jude Law in these prequels) is gay, and Beasts 2 revealed that the future Hogwarts headteacher had a blood pact with Grindelwald, made in their youth, to never go into battle with one another. Then again, the latter’s “crimes” last time out were more like endless devious plotting. I suppose The Evil Five-Year Plan of Grindelwald didn’t have quite the right ring to it.

Could these secrets be ones we already know about, but the main protagonists in the new episode do not? Perhaps Dumbledore’s queer identity is a big deal in the wizarding world – which Rowling has always taken great care to present as a sorcerous mirror image of our own society. Yet it’s hard to see her going big on Dumbledore’s battles against the bigots, for obvious reasons.

One of Beasts 2’s other big revelations was that Ezra Miller’s Credence Barebone is really Aurelius Dumbledore, the long-lost brother of Albus and their sibling Aberforth. If the world’s greatest wizard has secrets up his gown that are even more devastating than these, then truly he represents a sort of human version of Area 51, spitting out enigmas with elegant regularity for the convenience of Rowling’s whirling plot machine.

Mads Mikkelsen, who replaces Johnny Depp as Grindelwald for part three of the series
Mads Mikkelsen, who replaces Johnny Depp as Grindelwald for part three of the series. Photograph: Ettore Ferrari/EPA

Fantastic Beasts now finds itself in a similar position to the Star Wars prequel series, which built up at glacial pace towards the point where Anakin Skywalker finally turned into Darth Vader, yet left viewers with a massive sense of anticlimax when the big reveal actually happened. Even worse, Beasts doesn’t even seem to know what it is building up to, other than the presumed quiet retirement of Eddie Redmayne’s Newt Scamander after dispensing with the Grindelwald-shaped threat sometime after the end of part five.

We already know that Grindelwald isn’t up to much in old age – he ends up locked in his own fortress for half a century while waiting for He Who Must Not Be Named to come and kill him. So all of Fantastic Beasts’ magic lies in the dizzying visual splendour of the old-school, jazz-age wizarding world – and as Crimes of Grindelwald proved, that only goes so far.

According to a plot synopsis, The Secrets of Dumbledore will see the wizard send Newt and his friends off on a dangerous mission. It could be to put the kibosh on Grindelwald’s late evil wheeze, or perhaps to discover a rare monster that holds the clue to turning the tide against the baddies. But let’s fact it, it’s probably going to be to save Warner Bros from having to call a halt to this whole darn sorcerous farrago while the wizarding world still has at least a little bit of its dignity intact.


Ben Child

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald review – Jude Law's Dumbledore shines
JK Rowling’s creative imagination is as fertile as ever, but the second film in the series is bogged down by franchise detail

Peter Bradshaw

08, Nov, 2018 @9:00 PM

Article image
Fantastic Beasts and where to cancel them: how the Wizarding World lost its magic
With some cast members in disgrace and others at odds with creator JK Rowling over trans rights, the Harry Potter spin-off has become embroiled in controversy. Can it make it to the end of its five-film series?

Ryan Gilbey

08, Apr, 2022 @5:00 AM

Article image
Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore review – good-natured magical entertainment
Visually impressive third adventure looks great, with an ever more Dickensian Eddie Redmayne, though there are questions about the Harry Potter timeline

Peter Bradshaw

05, Apr, 2022 @2:00 PM

Article image
Can Fantastic Beasts 3’s return to Hogwarts save JK Rowling’s Wizarding World?
A new trailer reveals that Secrets of Dumbledore, the third Harry Potter prequel, is heading back to the wizarding school once again

Ben Child

04, Mar, 2022 @9:28 AM

Article image
Fantastic Beasts 2: why can't they just let Dumbledore be gay?
JK Rowling outed Harry Potter’s mentor years ago, but the new film exploring the wizard’s younger years leaves his romantic life to guesswork

Caspar Salmon

01, Feb, 2018 @4:30 PM

Article image
Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald – first full trailer released
The first footage for the follow up to Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them has been launched online

Guardian film

13, Mar, 2018 @4:02 PM

Article image
Everything we know about JK Rowling's Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them
We’ve been scrubbing up on the Harry Potter author’s return to the world of witchcraft and wizardry, which will star Eddie Redmayne as swashbuckling ‘magizoologist’ Newt Scamander

Ben Child

07, Aug, 2015 @5:17 PM

Article image
Jude Law as Dumbledore and darkness ahead: our first look at Fantastic Beasts 2
The first image and title reveal for the latest big screen JK Rowling adventure promises doom, Depp and a younger Dumbledore

Ben Child

16, Nov, 2017 @7:12 PM

Article image
Five things we learned about Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them
Eddie Redmayne’s Newt Scamander is a beastie-carrying eccentric, while there’s a reason America’s Muggles have been renamed ‘No-Majs’

Ben Child

06, Nov, 2015 @6:10 PM

Article image
Mads Mikkelsen lined up to replace Johnny Depp in Fantastic Beasts 3
The Danish actor is reportedly first in line to play ‘dark wizard’ Gellert Grindelwald in the third Harry Potter prequel

Andrew Pulver

11, Nov, 2020 @10:00 AM