Joker was criticised for ripping off old classics. So why does 1917 get a pass?

With its showy camerawork, comforting heroism and nostalgia for a noble Britain, Sam Mendes’ film is anything but original

This year, 1917, the faux one-shot, first world war thriller directed by Sam Mendes, is tipped to join the club of worthy Anglo period drama the Academy likes to reward. This generation’s Chariots of Fire, say, or The English Patient. But its success hinges on a certain cultural amnesia which has not affected one of its chief rivals, Joker.

Unlike Joker 1917 has been relatively untainted by controversy: it is not a film accused of inciting incels. The other knock on Joker has been that it is Todd Phillips doing Scorsese karaoke, that it is a facsimile of other, better films. But the same is true of 1917.

Like 1917, Peter Weir’s 1981 film Gallipoli is about two young men, one worldlier than the other, making a perilous cross-country trek that (spoiler alert) only one survives, ending with a desperate sprint through the trenches. The hero in both films is running not for his own life but that of his fellow soldiers, with a message to abort an imminent attack. In each case he fails to reach his destination before the first wave goes over. No less a critic than Pauline Kael described Gallipoli with lethal politeness, as “an exemplary academic film about the waste of war”. The film is held up as a classic in Australia, but less well remembered in the US.

To its credit, 1917 takes some of those elements and welds them to a new, or at least newly fashionable, form. Mendes has spoken of his admiration for Alfonso Cuarón’s Children of Men, and the long takes in that film have since become de rigueur. The natural extension of the long take is the single-shot film – or the pretend single-shot film, as in 1917 and Alejandro González Iñárritu’s Oscar-winning Birdman. Mendes owes a debt, too, to Christopher Nolan’s Dunkirk, with which 1917 shares an editor (Lee Smith), a ticking-clock structure and the emphasis on spectacle over character that marks a blockbuster built for international markets.

Direct descendent … … Clive Owen and Claire-Hope Ashitey in Children of Men.
Direct descendant … … Clive Owen and Claire-Hope Ashitey in Children of Men. Photograph: Universal/Sportsphoto Ltd./Allstar

All of which would be fine, if 1917 wasn’t being hailed as groundbreaking. Yet the film’s acceleration to pole position in the Oscar race can be attributed, I think, to the fact that all that technical ingenuity is exercised in service of a familiar, comforting story. (As well as the degree to which its studio backers hves publicised the difficulty of its production – the same rules have long applied in the acting categories). It’s a tale of heroism in the manner of 2016’s Hacksaw Ridge, only this particular war has been thoughtfully airbrushed: you’ll never hear a quieter medic’s tent than the one Mendes gives us. Screams are conspicuously absent, never mind that the company has just been ambushed in no man’s land.

It ends with our hero wandering from tent to tree, slumping against one in an image that echoes the film’s first. There’s a striking romanticism to the scene – a return to nature after the horrors of the trenches, explicitly tied to a yearning for home: away from Europe and back to England. Mendes would surely bristle at the parallel, but 1917 ends with the same kind of nostalgia for a green and pleasant land that attracted people to Brexit (not to mention Midsomer Murders). And it’s a hankering for that same kind of Britishness that might help explain its appeal.

In contrast, Gallipoli dramatised a military disaster that is seen as the moment in which a young country realised the motherland couldn’t be trusted. But as any member of a former colony will tell you, sentimental deference dies hard.

Harry Windsor

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Oscars 2020: Joker leads pack – but Academy just trumps Baftas for diversity
Joker nominated for 11 awards while 1917, The Irishman and Once Upon a Time in Hollywood all up for 10 as Cynthia Erivo sole non-white acting nominee

Catherine Shoard

13, Jan, 2020 @3:36 PM

Article image
Why 1917 should win the best picture Oscar
We start our annual series with the frontrunner: Sam Mendes’s cinematic groundbreaker, which immerses us in the horror of war as never before

David Cox

28, Jan, 2020 @6:00 AM

Article image
Oscars 2020: shallow Joker squats on top of patchy and infuriating nominations | Peter Bradshaw
The supervillain origin story has again squeezed out a clutch of much better films, but this isn’t the shabbiest shortlist I’ve seen

Peter Bradshaw

13, Jan, 2020 @4:10 PM

Article image
The full list of 2020 Oscar nominations
All the nominations for the 92nd Academy Awards, which take place on 9 February

Guardian film

13, Jan, 2020 @3:34 PM

Article image
Oscars tonight: timetable, predictions and all you need to know
The 92nd Academy Awards have finally arrived: here’s what you need to know, when you need to know it by and who (we think) will win the key prizes

Guardian film

10, Feb, 2020 @12:01 AM

Article image
Oscars 2020: Bong Joon-ho wins multiple awards for Parasite – as it happened
Parasite wins best screenplay, best director and best picture in an incredible night for the South Korean director – we followed the results live

Stuart Heritage, Hannah Marriott and Priya Elan, with Hadley Freeman and Benjamin Lee in Hollywood

10, Feb, 2020 @2:49 PM

Article image
Oscar winners 2020: the full list
From Parasite to Pitt, all the Oscar results from the 92nd Academy Awards

Guardian film

10, Feb, 2020 @7:50 PM

Article image
Baftas 2020: Sam Mendes and 1917 emerge victorious with seven awards
Mendes’s harrowing first world war movie takes best film and best director, while Joaquin Phoenix and Renée Zellweger win the top acting prizes

Mark Brown and Lanre Bakare

02, Feb, 2020 @9:42 PM

Article image
1917's Golden Globes glory fair reward for thrilling and distinguished work
Sam Mendes’s first world war film, not widely tipped beforehand, is a worthy winner for its immersive audacity and technical brilliance

Peter Bradshaw

06, Jan, 2020 @7:44 AM

Article image
1917 deserves Baftas' thunderous applause – Joker does not | Peter Bradshaw
Sam Mendes’ sweep goes some way to making amends for the awards’ now-notorious nomination shutouts – but I still can’t get onboard with the love for Todd Phillips’ cackling standup

Peter Bradshaw

02, Feb, 2020 @10:04 PM