Farmers’ union called UK environment targets ‘irrational’ and ‘unachievable’

NFU raised questions over water pollution, tree planting and rewilding targets, according to documents

The National Farmers’ Union (NFU) raised questions about the government’s proposed targets on water pollution, tree planting and rewilding, calling them “irrational” and “unachievable”, according to documents published by the environment department.

Under the 2021 Environment Act, the government was required to set legally binding targets for nature recovery and environmental improvements. It began consultation on those targets in March 2022, recommending, for example, an increase in tree canopy and woodland cover from 14.5% to 17.5% of total land area in England by 2050. Water pollution reduction targets were initially set for 2037.

After the consultation closed and the targets were published, there was some disappointment. The tree canopy target had been reduced to 16.5%, while the water pollution target had been delayed to 2038.

The newly published consultation documents show that the NFU’s response was highly critical of the initial proposals.

The lobby group, which represents powerful voices in the agriculture sector, said proposals to reduce nutrient pollution from animal waste and fertiliser were “irrational”.

It told the government: “Broadly, we consider the level of ambition across the nutrient targets to be unachievable, inconsistent and irrational. The NFU and its members are committed to building on past successes and further reducing nutrient losses to the environment from agriculture. However, this effort must be balanced with the need to produce food, fibre and energy on farm, thereby protecting the rural economy and maintaining food security.”

The union also said it did not agree with targets to reverse species extinction, and in particular spoke out against reintroducing lost species. It said: “The NFU has long advocated that we should support species that are already present before we seek to introduce new species. So instead, we believe that we should aim to prevent the loss of species, as such a bespoke target approach to rare and threatened species could be beneficial in driving action to reduce biodiversity loss.”

It argued that the concept of rewilding was damaging to the countryside, warning against “adopting an approach that risks undermining the social fabric of rural communities”. It said: “Rewilding, for example, ignores the fact that our iconic farmed landscapes are valued by the many who make 4bn visits to the British countryside each year.”

It also said the tree planting target of 17.5% coverage was too ambitious. “An increase in tree canopy and woodland cover from 14.5% to 17.5% equates to 415,000 hectares of tree cover by 2050, approximately 15,000 hectares of trees a year. This is extremely ambitious, if not unachievable,” it said.

Nature groups said the union was “deluded and dangerous” and that it was “stunting progress towards a greener future” after its lobbying against nature restoration policies was revealed.

Rob Percival, the head of food policy at the Soil Association, said: “The NFU’s attitude towards environmental targets is defeatist, deluded and dangerous. There is clear scientific rationale for regenerating woodlands and increasing tree cover, but the NFU thinks it’s too difficult. Our rivers are choking on excess nutrients, primarily due to the proliferation of intensive livestock systems, but the NFU has dismissed pollution reduction targets as ‘irrational’. Instead they propose more of the same – more poultry, more pollution.

“It’s bizarre and unfortunate that the NFU is displaying such a lack of imagination when the stakes are so high. Resolving the climate and nature crises will entail difficult trade-offs in land use, and a radical shift in the way that we eat and farm. With the right policies in place, farmers and producers can be paid to lead the change. In adopting such an obstructionist stance, the NFU is letting down its members, failing the public, and stunting progress towards a greener future.”

A Defra spokesperson said: “We have full confidence in our Environment Act targets, which were established through intensive consultation with businesses, land managers and environmental organisations. The delivery of these targets will require a shared endeavour across the whole of government, business and the individual decisions we all make, and through the Environment Act we have ensured a robust legal framework to hold current and future governments to account, protecting nature for generations to come.”

NFU director of policy Dr Andrew Clark said: “British farmers share the government’s environmental ambitions, but these targets must work in tandem with producing quality, sustainable food.

“The government’s own land use strategy seems to conflict with its ambitions for nature as well as delivering on its self-sufficiency targets, as set out in the national food strategy.

“Our consultation response highlighted that we need environmental targets which are ambitious but deliverable, and which sit alongside equally ambitious plans for domestic food production and UK food security.”


Helena Horton Environment reporter

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
England’s farmers to be paid to rewild land
Nature recovery schemes are part of post-Brexit subsidies overhaul, but eco campaigners are sceptical

Fiona Harvey Environment correspondent

06, Jan, 2022 @7:00 AM

Article image
Support UK farmers to meet climate targets, ministers told
Green campaigners call for clarity on tree-planting and reassurance on interim subsidy system

Fiona Harvey Environment correspondent

28, Sep, 2020 @7:00 AM

Article image
‘The R-word can be alienating’: How Haweswater rewilding project aims to benefit all
On the Lake District’s north-eastern fringe, two farmsteads are restoring the landscape with a commitment to conservation and providing jobs

Ben Martynoga

10, Mar, 2023 @6:01 PM

Article image
‘Living climate change now’: how WA farmers are trying to turn the tide
Agriculture is seen as a key culprit in rising emissions. Some on the land are aiming to lead by example, making their properties carbon neutral

Robert Baird Photographs: David Dare Parker

24, May, 2021 @5:30 PM

Article image
The latest cutting-edge technology changing our landscapes? Trees
The UK has been slow to embrace agroforestry, fearing trees compete for valuable space and water. In fact they can increase crop diversity as well as profits, as two pioneering Cambridgeshire farmers have found

Bibi van der Zee

06, Jan, 2018 @9:30 AM

Article image
Tories will not reach ‘embarrassingly poor’ nature targets by 2030, Labour says
Opposition to unveil plan to reverse biodiversity loss rather than simply halting it, which is government’s current target

Helena Horton Environment reporter

28, Nov, 2022 @2:13 PM

Article image
Ministers may go ahead with nature-friendly scheme, farmers believe
Speculation had been rife that government would block Elms subsidies for creating wildlife habitats

Helena Horton Environment reporter

19, Oct, 2022 @9:00 AM

Article image
Farmers threaten to quit NFU as leader backs scrapping of nature subsidies
Prominent members of farmers’ union express dismay after comments by Minette Batters

Helena Horton Environment reporter

26, Sep, 2022 @2:21 PM

Article image
‘It’ll take away our livelihoods’: Welsh farmers on rewilding and carbon markets
Despite attempts to integrate them into moves to tackle the biodiversity crisis, some farmers still feel sidelined and criticised

Tom Levitt

28, Dec, 2021 @11:30 AM

Article image
A UK tree provides hundreds of pounds of benefits a year, report finds
Exclusive: Trees standing alone and in small groups worth billions to UK, which researchers say justifies spending to protect them

Damian Carrington Environment editor

02, Dec, 2022 @12:00 PM