Nuclear is not the answer to the UK’s energy requirements | Letter

We need more honesty about the problems of the proposed Sizewell C plant, writes Rae Street

In his letter (22 December), Tom Smith describes the problems of storing the radioactive waste that is being produced by the UK nuclear reactors, and says that we need more honesty about these issues. The latter is also true of other problems with “new nuclear build”. Take, for example, the proposed Sizewell C reactor on the east coast.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has estimated that extreme “sea level events” could occur “at least once per year at many locations by 2050”. Sizewell C will be built near the sea on marshland. One engineer has estimated that the land where the reactor would be built will turn into a promontory encircled by the sea. Clearly the reactor site could be flooded.

Then there is the problem of obtaining uranium, which is currently the fuel for the nuclear reactors. The UK has to import uranium from across the world. It is mainly mined on the land of Indigenous people – in the US, in Canada, in Australia and in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The miners and their families have suffered years of ill health and even death from proximity to uranium. At the same time, having to import uranium means that this is not an independent source of energy for the UK.

The government and the opposition have completely ignored all warnings; they go doggedly on, supporting the construction of the new nuclear reactor at Sizewell and considering plans to build others. But nuclear is not the answer to the UK’s energy requirements. Apart from anything else, it is vastly expensive. The money it swallows should be put into developing genuine sustainable energy: tidal, wind and solar.
Rae Street
Littleborough, Greater Manchester

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
EDF Energy to cut jobs to control cost of building nuclear power station

Company stops preparation of Hinkley Point site as negotiations continue over public subsidy for developing £14bn project

Damian Carrington

23, Apr, 2013 @1:04 PM

Article image
Nuclear energy and alternatives old and new | Letters
Letters: Let’s go for an expansive renewable energy system, backed up with energy efficiency and energy storage, says David Blackburn. Plus Mike Ellwood on the integral fast reactor, and John Barstow on the case for keeping coal as a backup

Letters

14, Aug, 2019 @4:02 PM

Article image
We need to revive the UK’s nuclear industry | Letter
Letter: To tackle the climate crisis and support our energy needs, we need both nuclear and renewables, writes Dr Charles Clement

Letters

31, Mar, 2022 @4:40 PM

Article image
Nuclear energy is anything but clean | Letter
Letter: The nuclear power industry has successfully rebranded an appallingly toxic energy industry by never mentioning the terrible legacy of nuclear waste, writes Ann Denise Lanes

Letters

25, Aug, 2021 @5:06 PM

Article image
Has the Chernobyl disaster affected the number of nuclear plants built?
Thirty years on from one of the worst radiation leaks in history, several countries have moved to phase out nuclear energy production altogether, and experts say another accident would kill the industry

Charlotte Beale

30, Apr, 2016 @8:00 AM

Article image
Nuclear energy is key in fight for climate | Letter
Letter: Ignore the myths about nuclear power, writes Rob Loveday of Generation Atomic – it is an essential source of clean energy

Letters

31, Aug, 2021 @4:30 PM

Article image
Nuclear power is an expensive gamble that may (or may not) pay off

Energy deals could suck in vast resources for generations, or prove one of the most far-sighted government decisions ever

John Vidal, environment editor

17, Feb, 2012 @3:56 PM

Article image
Nuclear is not the way to a clean energy future | Letters
Letters: We should be worried about the flood-proofing of our nuclear power plants, says Sue Roaf, while David Bridgewater argues for nuclear fusion, rather than fission. Plus letters from Dr Kevin Purdy, Dr John Doherty and John Starbuck

Letters

20, Sep, 2017 @6:38 PM

Article image
Fukushima blast shows nuclear is not the answer | Brahma Chellaney
Brahma Chellaney: Inherently risky, water-intensive and unreliable – we must admit we cannot depend on nuclear power

Brahma Chellaney

15, Mar, 2011 @12:06 PM

Article image
Scrapping of nuclear plant should see UK renewables filling the void | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to news that Hitachi has pulled out of the proposed Wylfa nuclear power plant in Anglesey

Letters

18, Jan, 2019 @4:13 PM