Court orders UK government to explain how net zero policies will reach targets

Green activists brought challenge, arguing climate change strategy did not spell out how carbon emissions cuts would be achieved

The high court has ordered the government to outline exactly how its net zero policies will achieve emissions targets, after a legal challenge from environmental groups.

Friends of the Earth, ClientEarth and the Good Law Project had all taken legal action over the government’s flagship climate change strategy, arguing it had illegally failed to include the policies it needed to deliver the promised emissions cuts.

In a judgment handed down late on Monday, Mr Justice Holgate said the strategy lacked any explanation or quantification of how the government’s plans would achieve the emissions target, and as such had failed to meet its obligations under Climate Change Act (CCA) 2008.

Environmental campaigners called the ruling, which came as the UK faced record-breaking temperatures, a “landmark” and “a breakthrough moment”, claiming it showed the net zero strategy was in breach of the CCA.

“We’re proud to have worked on this historic case,” said Katie de Kauwe, a lawyer with Friends of the Earth. “This landmark ruling is a huge victory for climate justice and government transparency.

“It shows that the Climate Change Act is a piece of legislation which has teeth, and can, if necessary, be enforced through our court system if the government does not comply with its legal duties.”

Sam Hunter Jones, senior lawyer at ClientEarth, said: “This decision is a breakthrough moment in the fight against climate delay and inaction. It forces the government to put in place climate plans that will actually address the crisis.”

Holgate’s judgment did not find for the claimants on all grounds. But he ordered the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (Beis) to prepare a report explaining how the policies outlined in the net zero strategy would contribute towards emissions reductions, and to present it to parliament by April 2023.

“The NZS did not go below national and sector levels to look at the contributions to emissions reductions made by individual policies (or by interacting policies) where assessed as being quantifiable,” Holgate said. “In my judgment it ought to have done so in order to comply with the language and statutory purposes of s.14 of the CCA 2008.”

Holgate also found that Greg Hands, the energy minister, signed off the net zero strategy despite not having the legally required information on how carbon budgets would be met.

The net zero strategy, published in October, included commitments to end the sales of new fossil fuel cars by 2030 and gas boilers by 2035. But it did not spell out how the strategy would be delivered or specify the cuts in emissions to be achieved in each sector.

A Beis spokesperson said: “The net zero strategy remains government policy and has not been quashed. The judge made no criticism about the substance of our plans which are well on track and, in fact, the claimants themselves described them as ‘laudable’ during the proceedings.”


Damien Gayle

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
High court orders UK government to explain clean air plan delay
Critics say air pollution issue is public health and not political issue and ministers must defend delay in high court

Matthew Taylor

25, Apr, 2017 @11:12 AM

Article image
Charities say next UK government must bring forward climate targets
Groups including Greenpeace, WI and Oxfam call for faster action in letter to all parties

Fiona Harvey Environment correspondent

04, Nov, 2019 @10:09 AM

Article image
Urgent policies needed to steer countries to net zero, says IEA chief
Economies are gearing up for return to fossil fuel use instead of forging green recovery, warns Fatih Birol

Fiona Harvey Environment correspondent

31, Mar, 2021 @6:00 AM

Article image
Dutch appeals court upholds landmark climate change ruling
Netherlands ordered to increase emissions cuts in historic ruling that puts ‘all world governments on notice’

Arthur Neslen

09, Oct, 2018 @1:35 PM

Article image
Ex-easyJet pilot fined for blocking road outside Harrods in climate protest
George Hibberd, convicted of obstruction with other Just Stop Oil activists, told court he gave up ‘dream job’ because of climate concerns


21, Feb, 2023 @7:25 PM

Article image
How criminalisation is being used to silence climate activists across the world
Guardian investigation finds growing number of countries passing anti-protest laws as part of playbook of tactics to intimidate people peacefully raising the alarm

Nina Lakhani, Damien Gayle and Matthew Taylor

12, Oct, 2023 @11:00 AM

Article image
Extinction Rebellion protester convicted of public order offence
Angie Zelter, 68, wanted judge to take ‘urgency of the climate emergency’ into account

Matthew Taylor

25, Jun, 2019 @3:10 PM

Article image
Extinction Rebellion: rights experts say peaceful protest in UK under threat
Liberty condemns ‘unworkable restrictions, fines and arrests’ used by police to stifle rallies

Matthew Taylor and Jessica Murray

03, Sep, 2020 @11:27 AM

Article image
UK government sued over ‘pie-in-the-sky’ net-zero climate strategy
ClientEarth and Friends of the Earth say strategy fails to include policies needed to ensure emissions cuts

Damian Carrington Environment editor

12, Jan, 2022 @6:00 AM

Article image
Human rights experts warn against European crackdown on climate protesters
UK has led the way, with countries across the continent making mass arrests, passing draconian new laws and labelling activists as eco-terrorists

Damien Gayle, Matthew Taylor and Ajit Niranjan

12, Oct, 2023 @11:00 AM