Net zero goals may be hindering the climate fight | Letter

The targets encourage a ‘burn now, pay later’ approach, writes Leslie Sklair, while Mark Walford says it is a form of colonialism to rob young people of their future to keep ourselves comfortable

Most of the media seem to think that the idea of net zero emissions is unproblematic, despite the fact that many climate scientists consider that it is very problematic. Given the prominence of the idea at Cop26, this lack of balance in the reporting of breakthroughs is worrying.

For example, Robert Watson, a former chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, has denounced net zero as a trap set by industrialists and governments to hoodwink the world. Watson and other climate scientists have argued that while net zero might be a great idea in principle, in practice it “helps perpetuate a belief in technological salvation and diminishes the sense of urgency surrounding the need to curb emissions now”. They say the push for net zero has encouraged a “burn now, pay later” approach, which has seen carbon emissions continue to rise.

As a sociologist, I am not in a position to evaluate such criticisms of net zero scientifically, but as a sociologist of science, I think it is important that there is a balanced debate about it.
Leslie Sklair
Emeritus professor of sociology, London School of Economics

• Peter Kalmus is right that “climate breakdown is the result of centuries of colonial and social oppression” (Climate depression is real. And it is spreading fast among our youth, 4 November). But it’s more than that. The activities that are causing climate breakdown are a form of colonialism in themselves. By living unsustainably now, we are living on the backs of people who will live after we have gone. We are stealing the wealth and future of others to keep ourselves comfortable. Fossil fuel companies are colonial enterprises, and the organisations that support them are propping up a form of colonialism which will impoverish us all.
Mark Walford
London

Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication.

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Climate emergency bill offers real hope | Letter
Letter: A group of MPs urge the government to get serious on tackling the climate crisis with the tabling of the climate and ecological emergency bill

Letters

02, Sep, 2020 @4:48 PM

Article image
Net zero delaying tactics expose Rishi Sunak’s desperation | Letters
Letters: The prime minister’s decision to postpone key climate targets is a cynical betrayal of what really matters, writes Bel Greenwood. Plus letters from Milo Sanders, Jeremy Wight, Charles Wilhelm, Alan Gray and Lillian Adams

24, Sep, 2023 @4:24 PM

Article image
The case must be made for radical climate action | Letters
Letters: John Rigby says direct action such as that by Insulate Britain will backfire, while Tim Burton says we need to make clear that capitalism can only ever be the cause of the crisis, not its solution

Letters

05, Nov, 2021 @4:58 PM

Article image
Radical action needed to hit UK’s zero-carbon target | Letters
Letters: Michael Stone on the reality of Britain’s consumption, Celia Forsyth on support for fossil fuel projects, Gemma Cantelo on making cities greener and Stephen Martin on the sustainable development goals

Letters

16, Jun, 2019 @4:47 PM

Article image
Ethical carbon offsetting has a role to play in tackling the climate crisis | Letters
Letters: Prof Mark Huxham and Mukti Kumar Mitchell on concerns about the viability of carbon offsets in response to an article by George Monbiot. Plus Barbara Foster and MSR Seshu on the climate implications of flights

Letters

31, Jan, 2022 @6:14 PM

Article image
Building solutions to the climate crisis | Letters
Letters: Tim Palmer believes the UK should help with climate adaptation efforts in the developing world. Susan Roaf makes a case for climate-ready buildings

Letters

17, Jun, 2019 @4:39 PM

Article image
Tackle fuel poverty and the climate crisis | Letter
Letter: The government needs to stop subsidising high-carbon heating and use the extra revenue to support low-income homes, writes Libby Peake of the Green Alliance

Letters

11, Oct, 2020 @3:14 PM

Article image
Tory climate goals are all smoke and mirrors | Letters
Letters: Readers Dave Hunter, David Cragg-James, Raj Parkash and Joy Webb are unimpressed by the government’s approach to the climate emergency, as set out in Alok Sharma’s Guardian article

Letters

25, Mar, 2021 @5:47 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on new climate goals: a destination is not enough | Editorial
Editorial: Bad decisions are harming the UK’s green credentials. Boris Johnson must get beyond targets if he wants be taken seriously

Editorial

20, Apr, 2021 @5:54 PM

Article image
There is an alternative to disruptive climate protest | Letters
Letters: Prof Rupert Read believes a moderate flank of activists who can bring people together is the way forward, while Cllr John Dearing urges people to get elected to local councils to make a difference. Plus a letter from Maggie LeMare

Letters

26, Jul, 2022 @5:51 PM