EU accused of ‘neocolonial’ plundering of tuna in Indian Ocean

Indian Ocean states say EU pushing weakest conservation efforts for yellowfin tuna while EU ‘distant fleet’ hoovers up the most fish

The EU has been accused of “hypocrisy and neocolonialism” for proposing insufficient measures to tackle overfishing of yellowfin tuna, while being the largest fisher of the prized species in the Indian Ocean.

Smaller than its Atlantic and Pacific bluefin cousins, the yellowfin tuna is one of the ocean’s fastest and strongest predators. Also called ahi tuna, this species is massively overfished in the Indian Ocean – so much so that supermarkets and brands including Tesco, Co-op and Princes recently took the surprising step of joining scientists and environmental groups to call for tough action to rebuild the $4bn population.

But although the Indian Ocean is bordered by Africa, Asia and Australia, the single biggest harvester of yellowfin in the area is the European Union. EU nations – principally Spain and France – operate a “distant water fleet” of 43 vessels that fish the seas thousands of miles from home. In 2019 they caught 70,000 tonnes of yellowfin, more than Indian Ocean coastal states such as Iran (58,000 tonnes), Sri Lanka and the Maldives (44,000 tonnes each).

EU ships are major users of “fish-aggregating devices” (FADs). These fishing aids are floating objects that cast a shadow to attract groupings of fish. By casting nets near FADs, catches can be increased with less effort but can lead to more bycatch – including juvenile tuna that have not yet reproduced.

Now a row has broken out between the EU and the tiny developing coastal states whose economies are directly dependent on the Indian Ocean. A former Seychelles fishery official has accused the EU of “hypocrisy and neocolonialism”, while the Maldives described the EU’s proposals to rebuild yellowfin populations as “woefully inadequate”.

Tuna being unloaded at Malé. The fish are crucial for jobs and food security in the Maldives.
Tuna being unloaded at Malé. The fish are crucial for jobs and food security in the Maldives. Photograph: Carl Court/Getty

These issues come in the buildup to next week’s “crucial” emergency meeting of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC), the regulatory body in charge of managing tuna stocks. Both the EU and the Maldives, out of 33 parties involved, have made proposals to the IOTC to reduce overfishing and rebuild populations.

It is the much poorer Maldives, however, that has proposed the toughest reductions. The EU is calling for a much less dramatic cut. Neither include measures to reduce the use of FADs, which NGOs say drives population decline.

“This is a ‘band-aid’ measure from the EU,” said Adam Ziyad, director general of the Maldives fisheries ministry and vice-chair of the IOTC. “It is nowhere near the required reduction levels to ensure we conserve the yellowfin stocks for our future generations. If they were serious, they would take a bigger hit and they would work with coastal states to have a better management plan.”

Chart of biggest yellowfin tuna catches

About 20% of the Maldives workforce is involved in fishing, mainly using pole and line rather than big nets. The country’s proposal has the support in principle of other developing nation states, including Kenya, South Africa and Tanzania, according to Ziyad.

“Yellowfin tuna is still in the red,” he said. “In the Maldives, we will take a 11% reduction in catch. It’s a difficult task for us to tell fishermen they have to take that hit. It’s important for jobs, for food security – it is still the most promising economic activity in the north and south of the Maldives.”

Each proposal is complex, but according to the Global Tuna Alliance, an independent body representing retailers and brands, the result is clear: the EU proposal would see 6% less yellowfin caught in 2021 compared with 2014 levels, while the Maldives proposal would mean a reduction of 14%.

The GTA welcomed both proposals but said the Maldives proposal was “much closer” to its own calls for a cut of 20%.

“Neither should be regarded as end points,” the GTA said. It claimed that the Maldives proposal was not “proportionate or equitable” either, because it focused on purse seiners, a type of wide-net fishing that is not generally practised by Maldives pole-and-line fishers.

Yellowfin tuna are weighed at the fish market. Increasing numbers of juvenile fish are being caught before they can reproduce.
Yellowfin tuna are weighed at Malé fish market. Increasing numbers of juvenile fish are being caught before they can reproduce. Photograph: Carl Court/Getty

Environmental organisations, meanwhile, called the Maldives proposal “the bare minimum” in a letter to the IOTC heads of delegation co-signed by groups including the World Wildlife Fund and Blue Marine Foundation. They noted, for example, that neither proposal addressed the use of FADs, which NGOs say worsens overfishing by disproportionately catching juvenile yellowfin.

Nirmal Shah, former chair of Seychelles Fishing Authority and now the chief executive of Nature Seychelles, described the EU proposal as a “delaying tactic”.

“The EU is hypocritical, going around the world talking about overfishing. It’s a neocolonial situation,” said Shah. “What the EU are telling us is they don’t care about our coastal nations.”

Jess Rattle, of the Blue Marine Foundation, accused the EU of being the “biggest contributor” to yellowfin tuna overfishing because of its dominance and use of FADs.

“Unsurprisingly, the EU has put forward a yellowfin proposal that is woefully insufficient, would not lead to the timely recovery of the stock and could in fact allow the EU fleet to increase its own catches, compared to 2019,” Rattle said.

She welcomed the Maldives proposal, which urges catch reduction, as “in line with IOTC management advice”, adding that it “calls for a much greater catch reduction than the EU’s, takes into account the needs of developing coastal states, and shows truly fantastic leadership that we hope will be met with support from all IOTC members”.

Greenpeace described the EU’s proposal as “outrageous and inequitable”, and said neither proposal was enough to rebuild the tuna population.

In response to the criticism, an EU official said it strongly supported “an effective reduction of catches to rebuild stock” and had been “instrumental” in the IOTC’s decision to convene a special session. The official defended the EU proposal as “ambitious but realistic”, with an obligation to reduce catches for all fleets, regardless of size, in a fair and equitable way.

With neither the EU nor the Maldives proposing to restrict FADs, it was Kenya and Sri Lanka that submitted a separate proposal to do so.

“Kenya, the Maldives and like-minded coastal nations only fish in the Indian Ocean, so if the stocks get depleted we are the ones who suffer,” said Stephen Ndegwa, assistant director of fisheries at Kenya’s agriculture ministry. “We will have nothing for future generations.

“The foreign fishing vessels, like the EU vessels, will move to other oceans, but we won’t be able to move – and we will be stuck with no fish.”


Karen McVeigh

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Sylvia Earle: ‘We are on the brink – a million species may be lost’
We are a species that is superb at killing, says veteran oceanographer, who calls for us to stop treating fish like crops and give them the respect they deserve

Chris Michael in Vancouver

09, Feb, 2023 @5:42 PM

Article image
Tiny Pacific island nation declares bold plan to protect 100% of its ocean
Niue is creating a marine park to protect its waters, an area the size of Vietnam, from illegal fishing

Claire Turrell

30, May, 2022 @6:15 AM

Article image
World leaders descend on France for ocean summit as Macron puts spotlight on seas
As One Ocean event in Brest aims to deliver ‘blue diplomacy’ in areas from pollution to overfishing, activists warn against ‘bluewashing’

Jon Henley

08, Feb, 2022 @1:09 PM

Article image
UK to trial ‘highly protected marine areas’ in win for ocean campaigners
‘Historic’ move to ban destructive fishing methods in five habitats welcomed, but conservationists say change must come faster

Karen McVeigh

09, Jun, 2021 @10:54 AM

Article image
Licence to krill: the destructive demand for a ‘better’ fish oil
Industrial fishing of the tiny crustacea in a dietary supplements gold rush is threatening the Antarctic food chain – and even the climate

Richa Syal

07, Sep, 2021 @5:01 AM

Article image
Weak controls failing to stop illegal seafood landing on EU plates, investigation shows
EU financial watchdog blames small fines and feeble controls in some states for amount of illegal seafood

Karen McVeigh

27, Sep, 2022 @5:00 AM

Article image
Cutting the food chain? The controversial plan to turn zooplankton into fish oil
A budding industry that aims to catch zooplankton for health supplements and fish food has scientists fearing that its effects on marine ecosystems could be devastating

Regin Winther Poulsen in Tórshavn

19, Jan, 2022 @6:45 AM

Article image
Millions of tonnes of dead animals: the growing scandal of fish waste
Dumped at sea, lost on land or left to rot in shops and fridges, the global catch of fish is being wasted like never before – hurting not only the oceans but the nutrition of billions of people. Can it be reversed?

Emma Bryce

09, May, 2022 @5:15 AM

Article image
Fishing nations to lower catch limits for Atlantic bigeye tuna
Plan aims to allow tuna population to recover from overfishing, but conservationists say endangered mako shark has been overlooked

Karen McVeigh

27, Nov, 2019 @2:00 PM

Article image
‘An invisible killer’: how fishing gear became the deadliest marine plastic
Plastic in the depths: as ‘ghost gear’ chokes the ocean, campaigners call for mandatory measures including buy-back schemes and recycling

Emma Bryce

07, Nov, 2022 @6:00 AM