Nuclear energy is key in fight for climate | Letter

Letters

Tuesday, 31 Aug 2021

Ignore the myths about nuclear power, writes Rob Loveday of Generation Atomic – it is an essential source of clean energy

The letter on nuclear energy (25 August) sadly could not be more wrong – nuclear is one of the cleanest fuels we have, and has always been so. The carbon and material footprints of nuclear – for its entire lifetime, including mining and decommissioning – are lower than solar and on a par with wind, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Moreover, the nuclear industry manages its waste stream – that is more than can be said for the solar industry, which is set to produce millions of tons of toxic waste. Besides, spent nuclear fuel is not “waste” but a valuable source of low-carbon energy that can be recycled via reprocessing or proposed breeder reactors, thereby neutralising the vast majority of the radioactivity.

At a time when we need every tool in the box to fight the climate crisis – and nuclear is one of the most effective – isn’t it time we started to look at the facts rather than repeat myths about nuclear waste?
Rob Loveday
Generation Atomic

• Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication.

Letters

Tuesday, 31 Aug 2021

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Nuclear energy and alternatives old and new | Letters

Letters: Let’s go for an expansive renewable energy system, backed up with energy efficiency and energy storage, says David Blackburn. Plus Mike Ellwood on the integral fast reactor, and John Barstow on the case for keeping coal as a backup

Letters

14, Aug, 2019 @4:02 PM

Nuclear energy is anything but clean | Letter

Letter: The nuclear power industry has successfully rebranded an appallingly toxic energy industry by never mentioning the terrible legacy of nuclear waste, writes Ann Denise Lanes

Letters

25, Aug, 2021 @5:06 PM

Strategies for nuclear weapons and waste | Letters

Letters: It is essential that Europe does not become the arena for a build-up of nuclear weapons, writes Catherine West MP. It is surely time to bury the Micawber principle, says Professor Neil Hyatt

Letters

07, Aug, 2019 @4:59 PM

Exposing UK government folly of investment in new nuclear | Letters

Letters: A new build programme would create an intolerable burden on communities into the far future, writes Andrew Blowers; while Rose Heaney wonders why our abundant renewable energy sources are being overlooked

Letters

24, Jan, 2018 @6:23 PM

Scrapping of nuclear plant should see UK renewables filling the void | Letters

Letters: Readers respond to news that Hitachi has pulled out of the proposed Wylfa nuclear power plant in Anglesey

Letters

18, Jan, 2019 @4:13 PM

Response: George Monbiot is wrong. Nuclear power is not the way to fight climate change

Response: Renewable energy is a safe, clean source which will become cheaper as we invest in it, says Jeremy Leggett

Jeremy Leggett

24, Mar, 2011 @7:59 AM

We need to revive the UK’s nuclear industry | Letter

Letter: To tackle the climate crisis and support our energy needs, we need both nuclear and renewables, writes Dr Charles Clement

Letters

31, Mar, 2022 @4:40 PM

Coastal flooding and peat bogs | Letters

Letters: More than 15,000 buildings were built in coastal areas at significant risk of coastal flooding in the UK between 2005 and 2014, write Tom Spencer and Gerd Masselink. Meanwhile Alastair Edwards says the Irish shouldn’t be bashed too much over their carbon emissions, but Dr John Doherty warns against erecting wind turbines on bogland

Letters

28, Nov, 2018 @5:34 PM

Nuclear option is not the best for energy transition away from Russian fuels | Letters

Letters: Readers respond to George Monbiot’s article about moving away from oil and gas to nuclear power – and reflect on other ways to limit dependency on Russia for fuel

Letters

10, Mar, 2022 @6:40 PM

Nuclear is not the way to a clean energy future | Letters

Letters: We should be worried about the flood-proofing of our nuclear power plants, says Sue Roaf, while David Bridgewater argues for nuclear fusion, rather than fission. Plus letters from Dr Kevin Purdy, Dr John Doherty and John Starbuck

Letters

20, Sep, 2017 @6:38 PM