Food for thought on our carbon footprint | Letters

Artificially grown ‘meat’ has the potential to reduce carbon emissions, argues Patrick Cosgrove. As for Extinction Rebellion, its aims couldn’t be clearer, according to Mark Haworth-Booth

The close correlation between diet and environment that has been demonstrated by Michael Clark at the University of Oxford (Healthy food choices best for people and planet, study shows, 29 October) is interesting and potentially important. I hope the researchers will extend their studies into the environmental impact of what is variously known as cultured, in vitro or lab-grown meat. These products are now reaching consumers and prices will fall. Ostensibly, they appear environmentally beneficial.

The “meat” is grown from cell samples painlessly extracted from a small number of animals, so killing and long-distance freighting is eliminated. Methane from domestic ruminants will be drastically reduced. Forests need not be supplanted by grazing or soy production for animal feed. Land can be released for growing more plant-based food or to be returned to nature. If it can also be shown that environmental harm is curbed, the role these products can play will be crucial in reducing greenhouse gasses. More research is required as soon as possible.
Patrick Cosgrove
Chapel Lawn, Shropshire

• I take issue with your editorial on Extinction Rebellion (22 October) and whether it wishes to achieve “reform or revolution”. Neither, thank you. Our three aims are clear: truth-telling by government, rapid action towards zero-carbon emissions, and – for many of us the most important one – a citizens’ assembly charged with mapping out the best ways in which the UK can address the climate emergency.

We believe a citizens’ assembly, like the Irish one that addressed abortion, can create a plan that most members of this country would buy into and act upon. It is disappointing that the government shows no sign of accepting this modest request – but it also disappointing that journalists are not putting pressure on ministers to explain their thinking (if any) on this.
Mark Haworth-Booth
Swimbridge, Devon

• This article was amended on 31 October 2019. Due to an editing error, Mark Haworth-Booth’s letter listed one of Extinction Rebellion’s aims as “truth-telling to government”. That should have been “truth-telling by government”, as he originally wrote. This has now been corrected.

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters

• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Guardian view on net-zero carbon emissions: sooner is better | Editorial
Editorial: Government advisers have explained how to erase the nation’s carbon footprint. Science dictates that we do it as fast as we can

Editorial

02, May, 2019 @5:29 PM

Article image
Can lab-grown food save the planet? | Letters
Letters: Daniel Pryor of the Adam Smith Institute, David E Hanke, Georgina Ferry and Prof Mick Watson respond to an article by George Monbiot claiming that lab-grown food will end farming and save the planet

Letters

09, Jan, 2020 @7:14 PM

Article image
Giving up beef will reduce carbon footprint more than cars, says expert
Study shows red meat dwarfs others for environmental impact, using 28 times more land and 11 times water for pork or chicken

Damian Carrington

21, Jul, 2014 @9:00 PM

Article image
How to reduce your carbon footprint #GlobalWarning
From cutting down on meat to contacting your local representatives and investing in clean energy, here are 15 ways to help reduce global carbon emissions

Chris Goodall

19, Jan, 2017 @11:47 AM

Article image
Coastal flooding and peat bogs | Letters
Letters: More than 15,000 buildings were built in coastal areas at significant risk of coastal flooding in the UK between 2005 and 2014, write Tom Spencer and Gerd Masselink. Meanwhile Alastair Edwards says the Irish shouldn’t be bashed too much over their carbon emissions, but Dr John Doherty warns against erecting wind turbines on bogland

Letters

28, Nov, 2018 @5:34 PM

Article image
This plant-focused diet won’t save the planet | Letters
Letters: Richard Vernon says population reduction would do more for the planet than a change of diet, Stuart Roberts and John Davies extol the benefits of British farming, Dr Michael Antoniou calls for balanced scientific information and Paul Faupel on meeting his dietary needs with chocolate-enrobed brazil nuts

Letters

18, Jan, 2019 @4:13 PM

Article image
Cut out meat, pets and kids to save the Earth | Letters
Letters: Readers react to George Monbiot’s article on dropping meat and dairy, news about Sainsbury’s selling vegan ‘fake meats’ , and a report on meat being found in vegan and vegetarian meals

Letters

12, Jun, 2018 @5:13 PM

Article image
Why it’s payback time on climate change | Letters
Letters: The generation that has benefited most from fossil fuels must start paying the price, argues Daniel Scharf

Letters

29, Aug, 2019 @4:45 PM

Article image
Scientists calculate carbon emissions of your sandwich
All-day breakfast filling identified as worst offender

Rebecca Smithers Consumer affairs correspondent

25, Jan, 2018 @6:00 AM

Article image
Why cutting cattle can’t solve the climate crisis | Letters
Letters: Stuart Roberts, vice-president of the NFU, makes the green case for maintaining cattle grazing in the UK, while Simon Fairlie thinks cutting meat production is a distraction

Letters

17, Dec, 2019 @4:25 PM