The need for better soil, and fewer people | Letters

Farmers should be incentivised to switch to nature-friendly farming techniques, writes Graeme Willis of the Campaign to Protect Rural England. Meanwhile Melvyn Rust says people should be persuaded to have slightly fewer children

Your article (Can we feed the world if we ditch intensive farming?, The Briefing, Journal, 28 January) highlights the hugely detrimental impact that industrial farming is having on the quality of our soils . The Campaign to Protect Rural England’s recent report on this very issue echoed many of these concerns, highlighting that soil degradation costs at least £1.2bn a year in England and Wales alone. Soil must be seen not only as a fundamental for delivering productive farming and a healthy countryside, but also critical to tackling climate change – or mitigating its worst effects. Its importance should not be understated.

There are solutions, however. By scaling up and incentivising farmers to switch to nature-friendly farming techniques, such as conservation agriculture and agroforestry, we will create a productive farming industry that works with nature and enables farmers to reduce their costs, while still producing the food and services that we need. Rebuilding biological life in soils is vital to enabling this life-giving asset to function as it should. Our soil will once again effectively lock in carbon, store and filter water, support ecosystems and restore the health of the natural environment.
Graeme Willis
Senior rural policy campaigner at the Campaign to Protect Rural England

• On page 3 of the Journal I read “the modern western diet needs a complete overhaul if we are to avoid potential ecological catastrophe” (Eat less meat – and redraw the entire global food system, 28 January). And on page 10: “Can we feed the world if we ditch intensive farming?”

Both of these concerns are predicated on a global population in excess of 10 billion people by 2050. Might it not be easier to persuade people to have slightly fewer children than it would be to move the western world on to a diet of nuts and berries? Of course it would also help to reduce our CO2 emissions and our carbon footprint.
Melvyn Rust
St Albans, Hertfordshire

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters

• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Meat, dairy and nurturing the soil | Letters
Letters: Dr Phillip Williamson, Yvonne Ingham and J Peter Greaves respond to Guardian coverage of the IPCC special report on climate change and land

Letters

13, Aug, 2019 @5:30 PM

Article image
This plant-focused diet won’t save the planet | Letters
Letters: Richard Vernon says population reduction would do more for the planet than a change of diet, Stuart Roberts and John Davies extol the benefits of British farming, Dr Michael Antoniou calls for balanced scientific information and Paul Faupel on meeting his dietary needs with chocolate-enrobed brazil nuts

Letters

18, Jan, 2019 @4:13 PM

Loss of soil threatens food production, UK government warns

More than 2m tonnes of topsoil is being eroded in the UK each year, jeopardising efforts to increase food production and releasing stored carbon dioxide

John Vidal, environment editor

24, Sep, 2009 @5:00 PM

Article image
Farming and humanity versus the environment | Letters
Letters: Guy Smith says it’s unfair to point the finger at farming as the cause of environmental damage, Iain Climie addresses food wastage, and Dr Blake Alcott says the most effective way to reduce your carbon footprint is to not reproduce

Letters

03, Jun, 2018 @5:01 PM

Article image
Hi-tech fixes aren’t the only way to save our soil | Letter
Letter: We should investigate innovative solutions, but not at the expense of tried-and-tested methods of farming, writes Alan Mitcham

Letters

11, May, 2022 @3:08 PM

Article image
Fewer people, fewer flights – to save the planet | Letter
Letters: Harold M Hastings, Tai Young-Taft and Chris Coggins on reducing population to cut emissions, Diana Heeks on flying less, Allan McRobert on drones, and Laura Clout on our time on Earth

Letters

28, Dec, 2018 @4:37 PM

Article image
Keeping the collapse of civilisation at bay | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to Damian Carrington’s interview with Paul Ehrlich whose book The Population Bomb was published 50 years ago

Letters

27, Mar, 2018 @5:37 PM

Article image
Wildlife needs a new plan for agriculture | Letters
Letters: Chris Packham’s manifesto for wildlife won’t work without a radical new plan for agriculture, says Michael Bunney

Letters

20, Sep, 2018 @4:58 PM

Article image
Population growth and climate change: fewer people does not mean more CO2 | Letters
Letters: Your editorial’s argument about a causal link between slowing population growth and increased economic growth is dangerously out of date

Letters

03, Aug, 2015 @6:16 PM

No appetite for action on food security | Felicity Lawrence
Felicity Lawrence: Finally Defra has recognised that we cannot take food security for granted, but the government's timetable is far too leisurely

Felicity Lawrence

10, Aug, 2009 @4:30 PM