Genetically modified animals

Despite its potential to battle disease and hunger, genetically engineered food is still controversial

Pigs

Last week, scientists from the University of Edinburgh’s Roslin Institute announced they had deleted the section of DNA that leaves pigs vulnerable to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome, which is estimated to cost European farmers £1.5bn a year in loss of livestock and decreased productivity. Genetically modified animals are banned from the EU food chain, but since this is a new and different technique it’s possible they’ll be appearing in bacon sandwiches in a few years.

Mosquitoes

British company Oxitec has created genetically modified male mosquitoes that carry a “self-limiting gene”. When they are released into the wild and mate with females their offspring do not reach adulthood, so crucially do not contribute to the spread of the Zika virus. Other researchers are looking at using genetic modification to curb the spread of malaria.

Cows

Scientists in both China and Argentina have genetically engineered cows to produce milk similar in composition to that made by humans. After modifying embryos, an Argentinian cow – Rosita Isa – was born that expressed milk containing proteins present in human milk but lacking in cow milk. However, there are a number of scientific, safety and taste issues that would have to be overcome before this replaces “mother’s milk” for infants.

Chickens

The Roslin Institute is working on GM chickens that contain an extra gene that interrupts the transmission of avian flu. Unlike a vaccination, the modification still protects the bird if the virus mutates. However, some farmers argue it is better to enforce good farming practices than create disease-free animals.

Salmon

Last year, the Canadian authorities allowed a GM salmon designed by US company AquaBounty to be sold to consumers. It is engineered to reach market size in 18 months, half the time of its natural counterpart. However, the fish is not labelled GM in shops.A recent survey found 90% of Canadians are in favour of clearer food labelling.

Contributor

Ian Tucker

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The five: genetically modified fruit
New varieties promise to beat disease, cut food waste and offer enticing new flavours

Bertille Duthoit

13, Jan, 2019 @7:00 AM

Article image
The five: genetic fixes for the climate crisis
Scientists are discovering innovative ways to help the natural world adapt to environmental change

Dani Ellenby

14, Jul, 2019 @5:59 AM

Article image
The five: chimeras created by science
A chimera is an organism with genetic material from two or more sources

Desiree Schneider

11, Aug, 2019 @5:59 AM

Article image
The five: magnetoreceptive animals
Species making intriguing use of the Earth’s magnetic field…

Ian Tucker

24, Mar, 2019 @7:00 AM

Article image
The five: factors that affect early greying
As researchers confirm that stress can turn you grey, we look at the other scientific factors that could salt-and-pepper your crowning glory

Anna Cooper

26, Jan, 2020 @5:30 AM

Article image
Five smart things honeybees can do
These insects’ brains may be tiny, but they’re better with numbers than many human children and they are past masters at communicating life skills

Ian Tucker

10, Feb, 2019 @7:00 AM

Article image
The five: changes in animal behaviour due to global heating
Species around the world are being forced to alter their diet, migratory patterns, feeding grounds and more

Jonathan Chan

19, Jan, 2020 @5:50 AM

Article image
Self-destructive species: from exploding ants to postnatal octopuses
Animals that sacrifice their lives, for their homes or offspring – or just because they’re in the wrong place at the wrong time

Killian Fox

29, Apr, 2018 @6:00 AM

Article image
Science’s search for a super banana
A fruit bowl favourite and a staple food to millions, the banana is under threat from a formidable foe

Nic Fleming

05, Aug, 2018 @7:00 AM

Article image
‘Very little yield’: has genetically targeted medicine really made us healthier?
Billions were sunk into the promise of treatments personalised to the individual. Now many believe the money might have been better spent on public health interventions

Ned Carter Miles

09, Sep, 2023 @10:00 AM