Cut out meat, pets and kids to save the Earth | Letters

Readers react to George Monbiot’s article on dropping meat and dairy, news about Sainsbury’s selling vegan ‘fake meats’ , and a report on meat being found in vegan and vegetarian meals

Alongside George Monbiot’s suggestion (Want to save the planet? Drop meat and dairy, 8 June), another way to reduce greenhouse gases is to stop keeping pets. It’s been calculated that an average dog has an ecological footprint twice as large as that of a large car.

Like meat-eating, pet ownership is nowadays encouraged by a vast industry; the pet insurance sector alone is said to generate more of Britain’s GDP than fishing does. The production of pet food, provision of veterinary services and breeding the creatures are big businesses, all with an interest in promoting the alleged benefits of owning a furry friend.

There’s something rather astonishing about humans, especially those concerned about the environmental impact of our species on other ones, cheerfully possessing animals that are the results of generations of selective breeding and which exist purely to give their owners pleasure. It all sounds a bit like a ghastly dystopian sci-fi fantasy.
Brian Hughes 

• George Monbiot’s article inspired me to cook vegetable curry for dinner, but surely limiting population growth is as important as changing our diets in order to conserve human and other life forms on this planet?
Hazel Sutcliffe
Holmes Chapel, Cheshire

• The headline of George Monbiot’s article curiously echoes one that appeared in the Guardian last year (Best solution to climate change? Fewer children, 12 July 2017).

This earlier article, reporting on a study published in Environmental Research Letters, compares the results of different courses of action. By far the greatest impact is having one fewer child, which equates to saving 58 tonnes of CO2 for each year of a parent’s life. This takes into account the child’s total life, and that of his or her descendants, in proportions described in the article. In comparison, eating a plant-based diet would only save 0.82 tonnes. There is a graphic in the article which shows this very dramatically.

Therefore, while the measures proposed by George Monbiot are helpful, their effect will be minimal compared with reducing our progeny.
Roger Plenty

• George Monbiot is correct that the way we currently produce meat is inherently inefficient. But we don’t have to give up meat entirely. Instead, we should make meat from plants and through tissue engineering – no animals required. Plant-based meats are already available in grocery stores. From Moving Mountains’ new “bleeding” burger to Vivera’s groundbreaking steak, there has never been a better time to switch to plant-based meat, which is vastly better for the animals, our health, and the planet. For those who want to eat meat that actually came from animals, meat grown directly from cells, called “clean meat”, is coming soon; like plant-based meat, it will vastly ameliorate the harms spelled out by Mr Monbiot.
Bruce Friedrich
Executive director, The Good Food Institute, Washington DC

• I have always been intrigued/confused by the concept that vegetarians and/or vegans would want food to look like the very thing they profess to abhor (Sainsbury’s to sell vegan ‘fake meats’ next to real thing in 400-store trial, 11 June). Why would a vegetarian desire a pseudo-sausage or make-believe burger?
Dave Collins
Kidderminster, Worcestershire

• While the discovery of meat traces in vegan and vegetarian ready meals (‘Meat found’ in vegan food, 9 June) will have come as a shock to many – including, I suspect, those producing these foods – the reality is that we live in a world where animals are routinely killed by the billions for their body parts, and worrying about trace amounts of animal-derived foods in vegan products won’t help them. It’s no different from eating a veggie burger at a restaurant that also serves meat or off the grill at a friend’s barbecue – there’s always a chance of cross-contamination. What we have to remember is that the packets of bacon and beef sold by supermarkets are composed 100% of dead body parts – so those are the products we should avoid if we want to help animals.

Eating vegan isn’t about “perfection” or a quest for personal purity – it’s about achieving real change for animals suffering in the food industry. Choosing a vegan burger over a meat-based one is a win for them, the Earth and one’s arteries, and Peta offers a free vegan starter kit for anyone wanting to make the shift towards a more compassionate way of living.
Jennifer White
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals

• Join the debate – email

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit


The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Farming and humanity versus the environment | Letters
Letters: Guy Smith says it’s unfair to point the finger at farming as the cause of environmental damage, Iain Climie addresses food wastage, and Dr Blake Alcott says the most effective way to reduce your carbon footprint is to not reproduce


03, Jun, 2018 @5:01 PM

Article image
Diet advice on dairy food – and how to improve what poor children eat | Letters
Letters: Dr Christopher Birt on a recent Lancet study on dairy food, and Sofia Parente of Sustain on the sugary drinks levy and Healthy Start food vouchers


17, Sep, 2018 @5:11 PM

Article image
Strong arguments for giving up meat for good | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to an article that debunked the usual criticisms of veganism and vegetarianism


22, Jun, 2020 @4:05 PM

Article image
What is the true cost of eating meat?
As concerns over the huge impact on the environment, human health and animal welfare grow, what future is there for the meat industry, asks Bibi van der Zee

Bibi van der Zee

07, May, 2018 @5:00 AM

Article image
The Guardian view on vegans: a dietary challenge | Editorial
Editorial: A huge reduction in meat-eating is called for. No wonder carnivores are feeling defensive


01, Nov, 2018 @6:24 PM

Article image
Watchdog examines claims meat was found in vegan ready meals
Investigation launched by the Food Standards Agency into leading supermarket products

Kevin Rawlinson

08, Jun, 2018 @11:05 PM

Article image
Food for thought on our carbon footprint | Letters
Letters: Artificially grown ‘meat’ has the potential to reduce carbon emissions, argues Patrick Cosgrove. As for Extinction Rebellion, its aims couldn’t be clearer, according to Mark Haworth-Booth


29, Oct, 2019 @6:33 PM

Article image
The low-hanging fruit in the climate battle? Cutting down on meat | Gaby Hinsliff
Eating fewer animal products and less dairy would make a huge difference to carbon emissions, says Guardian columnist Gaby Hinsliff

Gaby Hinsliff

30, Apr, 2021 @6:00 AM

Article image
Tesco's pledge to carbon-label all products set to take centuries

Four years into Tesco's promised 'revolution in green consumption', 69,500 products will still be without carbon labels

Rebecca Smithers, consumer affairs correspondent

13, Oct, 2010 @11:21 AM

Article image
Veganism’s place in the climate change debate | Letters
Letters: We can practise all the accepted methods of reducing carbon emissions, but nothing is more effective than choosing to have no more than two children


12, Aug, 2016 @5:39 PM