Theresa May's local council set to spend £50,000 to fight Heathrow runway

Windsor and Maidenhead council looks to increase budget for fighting expected government go-ahead for third runway

Theresa May’s local authority is prepared to spend £50,000 on a judicial review if her government approves the expansion of Heathrow next week, documents released on Monday reveal.

The papers underline the scale of resistance that the prime minister will face from residents in her Maidenhead constituency, which she has represented since 1997, if she agrees to allow the third runway to go ahead.

Papers published before a crunch council subcommittee meeting on Thursday warn that the plans would have a “significant potential impact on the quality of life” of people living in the area, where there is widespread support for Gatwick to get the runway instead.

Simon Dudley, the Conservative leader of Windsor and Maidenhead council, told the Guardian he was determined to protect residents from the “adverse consequences of an expansion of Heathrow airport”, regardless of May’s links to the area.

He said Thursday’s meeting was about setting in place the next steps in the legal process. “We have been elected on a manifesto promise, and we respect the views of our residents, who are firmly in favour of expansion at Gatwick,” he said.

It comes amid growing expectation that May’s government will accept the recommendation of Sir Howard Davies’s airports commission to expand Heathrow rather than Gatwick, with cabinet ministers telling the Guardian that the west London plans offered much higher-value returns than the alternative.

Before a decision expected next week, Dudley will be asking for colleagues to agree to a budget that is £20,000 more than originally suggested in preparation for a judicial review of a government approval.

His council has teamed up with three others, Hillingdon, Richmond and Wandsworth, who are particularly angry about the possibility of Heathrow expansion after the previous prime minister, David Cameron, made a “no ifs, no buts” promise that it would not happen.

The documents released on the council’s website on Monday evening reveal legal correspondence between the group and various government ministers.

Most recently, lawyers representing the local authorities wrote to the government’s airport capacity directorate on 30 September 2016 calling for a consultation “in advance of any decision”, claiming that consulting councils afterwards would represent a “sham”.

The letter claims that the process by which ministers have taken the decision has been “shrouded in mystery” and warned that the “lack of openness and transparency is of great concern”.

Specifically, the letter argues that government work on air quality was promised but has not been released, and says that EU limits on nitrogen dioxide concentrations remain binding.

“There is nothing in the public domain to suggest that expansion at Heathrow has been assessed against the government’s air quality plan, which is in any event subject to a judicial review challenge,” it warns. It also warns that plans would be unlawful without a better understanding of the impact on air and noise pollution.

The council is particularly concerned about residents who are currently not under flight paths, but would be under the new plans.

The lawyers say that poor air quality is known to have a worse effect on the young and elderly, as well as those in lower socioeconomic groups.

“A decision which favours Heathrow now, without consultation and a proper analysis of the health and equality impact of locating a third runway at Heathrow, would be in breach of the public sector equality duty,” they add.

Moreover, they say, the mitigating factors being promised by Heathrow, such as a ban on night flights, are “expressed in vague terms which cannot meaningfully be assessed or considered”.

A Heathrow spokesperson said: “Local council opposition has significantly decreased since Heathrow expansion was last on the table in 2009 from a group of 21 councils to four. Heathrow expansion is the only option being considered for expansion with any local political support – with four local MPs and two local councils backing our plans.

“It will be for the government to decide whether to go ahead with our proposals to add up to 25,000 flights per year from 2021 to underserved long-haul markets and domestic connections supporting Britain to make a success of Brexit.”

Contributors

Anushka Asthana and Jessica Elgot

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Anti-Heathrow MPs plan to thwart government over third runway
Zac Goldsmith and John McDonnell part of coalition looking to undermine expected approval of expansion at Heathrow

Gwyn Topham, Jessica Elgot and Heather Stewart

14, Oct, 2016 @6:08 PM

Article image
Heathrow: Grayling to confirm final plan for third runway
Transport secretary will set out proposals amid growing rift over expansion scheme

Pippa Crerar Deputy political editor

04, Jun, 2018 @11:01 PM

Article image
Heathrow night flights to continue until third runway is built
Transport secretary says new rules on noise show government is tackling issue, but campaigners lament ‘business as usual’

Gwyn Topham and Jessica Elgot

13, Jul, 2017 @12:54 PM

Article image
Zac Goldmith's departure delayed after failed takeoff from Commons runway | John Crace
Chris Grayling spared a skewering from fellow Conservative MP Goldsmith over contentious Heathrow airport decision

John Crace

26, Oct, 2016 @7:26 AM

Article image
Theresa May to chair Heathrow third runway committee
Prime minister to take personal charge of cabinet group and push for decision on controversial airport plan by October

Jessica Elgot

24, Aug, 2016 @3:26 PM

Heathrow third runway: David Cameron commits to manifesto pledge - video

The prime minister, David Cameron, says he will not break his manifesto pledge on a third runway at Heathrow

05, Sep, 2012 @1:38 PM

Article image
Environment Agency joins Heathrow third runway critics

Environment Agency adds weight to growing criticism of proposed Heathrow airport expansion

Fred Attewill

13, Mar, 2008 @8:57 AM

Article image
Zac Goldsmith quits as MP over 'doomed' Heathrow expansion decision
Richmond Park MP’s resignation on day of government go-ahead for third runway forces difficult byelection for Theresa May

Rowena Mason Deputy political editor and Gwyn Topham

26, Oct, 2016 @12:13 AM

Article image
Heathrow to ban night flights as part of plan for third runway
Airport will ban arrivals and departures before 5.30am, and support the launch of an independent noise authority

Gwyn Topham and Nadia Khomami

11, May, 2016 @8:54 AM

Article image
New runway will be built at Heathrow or Gatwick by 2030, MPs told
Transport secretary insists government has made progress on expansion issue as Heathrow chief reveals concern over ‘worrying’ timeline

Gwyn Topham Transport correspondent

08, Feb, 2016 @6:44 PM