Australia passes controversial nuclear waste bill

Radioactive material set to be dumped in remote Aboriginal community, despite ongoing court case into legality of proposal

The Australian government has passed legislation that will create the country's first nuclear waste dump, despite fierce opposition from environmental and Aboriginal groups.

The passage of the National Radioactive Waste Management Bill 2010 through the Senate paves the way for a highly controversial plan to store nuclear waste in Muckaty Station, a remote Aboriginal community in the arid central region of the Northern Territory.

The ruling Labor party received support from the conservative coalition opposition to approve the bill, despite an ongoing federal court case over the legality of using the Muckaty site to store radioactive material.

Currently, nuclear waste from the medical and mining industries is stored in more than 100 "temporary" sites in universities, hospitals, offices and laboratories across Australia.

Anti-nuclear protesters disrupted proceedings in the Senate as the legislation was debated earlier on Tuesday, with the group heckling lawmakers from the public gallery over their support for the bill.

A recent medical study warned that transporting nuclear waste over long distances to such an isolated location, which is 75 miles north of the Tennant Creek township, could endanger public health.

"The site is in an earthquake zone, it floods regularly, there are very long transport corridors, there are no jobs being applied and it's opposed from people on the ground, on the front line from Tennant (Creek) all the way up to the NT government and people around the country," said senator Scott Ludlam of the Greens, which successfully added an amendment to the bill that bans the importing of foreign nuclear waste to the site.

Aboriginal groups launched legal action after claiming that traditional owners of the land around Muckaty do not approve of the dump, despite the government maintaining that the local Ngapa indigenous community supports the plan.

Under Australian Native Title law, indigenous groups recognised as the traditional owners of land must be consulted and compensated for any major new infrastructure.

Although the Australian government insists that it has not decided on a site for the dump, Muckaty is the only option under consideration and the Northern Territory government has already been offered AUS$10m if it accepts the facility.

Finding a location for a national nuclear waste dump has proved a major headache for successive Australian governments, with former prime minister John Howard rebuffed in his attempt to situate the facility in South Australia in 2004.

The Northern Territory government has complained that it is being strong-armed into taking the dump due to it being a "constitutional weak link" and not having the same rights as full Australian states.

Nuclear power remains a highly contentious issue in Australia, which, despite having the largest uranium deposits in the world, has steadfastly refused to shift its largely coal-fired energy generation to nuclear.


Oliver Milman

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Australia could store nuclear waste for other countries, Malcolm Turnbull says
PM tells Adelaide radio that he was sceptical Australia would ever build nuclear power stations, but a larger role in nuclear fuel industry was worth exploring

Daniel Hurst Political correspondent

28, Oct, 2015 @2:01 AM

Article image
Strategies for nuclear weapons and waste | Letters
Letters: It is essential that Europe does not become the arena for a build-up of nuclear weapons, writes Catherine West MP. It is surely time to bury the Micawber principle, says Professor Neil Hyatt


07, Aug, 2019 @4:59 PM

Article image
Europe faces €253bn nuclear waste bill
Disposal and decommissioning of plants in EU’s 16 nuclear nations outstrips available funds by €120bn, European commission study reveals

Arthur Neslen

04, Apr, 2016 @5:05 PM

Article image
Ship laden with nuclear waste heading to Australia despite safety concerns
The 25 tonnes of waste was originally generated by Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation and sent to France in 2001 for reprocessing

Oliver Milman

16, Oct, 2015 @4:41 AM

Article image
German nuclear waste reaches final destination
Shipment takes record 92 hours to arrive from France as police clear overnight roadblock of more than 3,000 protesters

Associated Press

09, Nov, 2010 @11:42 AM

Article image
Australia may have to stop making key cancer medicine if it doesn’t build nuclear waste dump, peak body says
Ansto chief says it may not be able to keep producing nuclear medicine if it runs out of waste storage space at its Lucas Heights facility

Tory Shepherd

17, Nov, 2022 @2:00 PM

Article image
Nuclear waste shipment reaches German storage site
Police clear anti-nuclear protesters from rail tracks allowing 'Chernobyl on wheels' to complete controversial trip from France

Matthew Weaver and agencies

08, Nov, 2010 @1:34 PM

Who to trust on nuclear? | Paul Dorfman

Paul Dorfman: Even without Fukushima sceptics might wonder why Britain ignores the German lead on energy

Paul Dorfman

13, Apr, 2011 @8:30 PM

Nuclear power: After the flood | Editorial
Editorial: The tendency in Britain to postpone politically painful choices about building new nuclear stations is dangerous


15, Mar, 2011 @12:05 AM

Article image
The nuclear industry stinks. But that is not a reason to ditch nuclear power | George Monbiot

George Monbiot: The debate is skewed by distrust of big corporate interests. Under proper scrutiny, new plants can give safer, cleaner energy

George Monbiot

04, Jul, 2011 @6:30 PM