After record A-level results, government must manage next year’s hangover

Analysis: switching to pre-Covid ‘norm-referenced’ grading in 2022 could sharply deflate results if adjustments are not made carefully

Compared with the chaos of 12 months ago, this year’s exam season has been smooth sailing for Gavin Williamson, the education secretary – who has been so relaxed that he couldn’t even remember his own A-level results when asked twice on Tuesday.

In 2020, as parents of sixth formers will clearly recall, the structure designed to award grades by the exam regulator Ofqual and the Department for Education collapsed amid an outcry over the unfairness of distributing results to pupils using the previous year’s evidence.

But this summer Williamson and Ofqual prioritised efficiency over micromanaging who got what grades. The sharp increase in results across the board mean there will be more celebrations than complaints this summer. But now the government faces managing next year’s hangover.

Simon Lebus, the departing chief regulator of Ofqual, said on Tuesday that exams would return next year because they were “proven to consistently be the best way of assessing what a student knows, understands and can do”.

Even if that is true, bringing them back won’t be simple. For the past two years, state schools have enjoyed a remarkable improvement in A-level results. The remaining maintained comprehensives outstripped even independent schools as their proportion of top grades jumped by 95% – from just 20% of entries to 39% in the space of two years.

Sharon Witherspoon of the Royal Statistical Society said there needed to be “an open discussion” about next year’s exams. She said: “Exams are statistically ‘norm referenced’ – the cutoffs between different grades are partly set by prior decisions about what grading results should look like. Is the plan to revert in one fell swoop to 2019 grade profiles, or to adjust them more slowly?

“This is an issue at the intersection of statistics and policy, and the public needs to be part of this conversation.”

But next year’s A-level cohort starts from an even worse position than this year’s, according to David Robinson of the Education Policy Institute.

While this year’s sixth formers had pre-pandemic GCSEs to show employers and admissions officers, the 2022 A-level candidates won’t even have that. Their GCSE grades were awarded during Williamson’s 2020 debacle and over the past 18 months they have endured all the chaos of pandemic lockdowns and burst bubbles. Next year’s sixth formers deserve a break just as much as this year’s did.

Politicians like to refer to A-levels as the “gold standard” of qualifications, an ironic reference given the pain the actual gold standard caused sterling and the British economy in the 1920s and 30s. Abruptly rejoining the gold standard of norm-referenced A-level outcomes will cause massive deflationary pain for students: in 2018, just over 2,600 students got three A*s; this year it was nearly 13,000.

It would help if the government had a properly funded catch-up plan for pupils, but it doesn’t – at least not at the scale demanded by its former catch-up tsar, who resigned in disgust.

It would also help if ministers this time had a developed and articulated plan B in case of who knows what. But, as was effectively concluded in an investigation last week into the government’s lack of education contingency planning, plans are for losers apparently.

Contributor

Richard Adams Education editor

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Williamson told about flaws in A-level model two weeks before results
Exclusive: Ofqual reassured Department for Education that faults could be managed by allowing appeals

Richard Adams and Heather Stewart

01, Sep, 2020 @7:39 PM

Article image
'Plan B' for rigorous mock exams to avoid rerun of A-level fiasco
Exclusive: Gavin Williamson to announce 2021 exam delay in England and back-up plan in event of Covid disruption

Richard Adams, Education editor

10, Oct, 2020 @5:00 AM

Article image
Ministers consider scrapping exam boards, as students await A-level results
Schools minister, Nick Gibb, says there is ‘a case for long-term, fundamental reform’ of the examination board system

Sally Weale Education correspondent

09, Aug, 2015 @2:04 PM

Article image
Ofqual board minutes reveal tensions with DfE ahead of exam results fiasco
Regulator aware A-level and GCSE grade assessment unreliable before results day

Richard Adams Education editor

22, Oct, 2020 @6:20 PM

Article image
Gavin Williamson to blame for England exams fiasco, says Ofqual chair
Education secretary called regulator and urged it to scrap new guidelines on appeals, MPs told

Richard Adams Education editor

02, Sep, 2020 @3:12 PM

Article image
Schools able to appeal over students' GCSE and A-level results
Exams watchdog confirms that English schools, but not pupils, will be able to call for a review after outcry over Scottish results

Sally Weale Education correspondent

06, Aug, 2020 @10:25 PM

Article image
Delay A-level and GCSE exams to give pupils more time, says Labour
Shadow education secretary Kate Green says exams should be pushed back to June 2021

Richard Adams and Peter Walker

30, Aug, 2020 @9:30 PM

Article image
Students in England to sit repeated mock A-levels and GCSEs, Ofqual says
Unions and school leaders critical after regulator publishes long-delayed contingency plan

Richard Adams Education editor

11, Nov, 2021 @5:29 PM

Article image
Teachers to get sweeping powers to decide exam results in England
Algorithms will not be used again but lack of national guidelines prompt fears of grade inflation

Richard Adams Education editor

25, Feb, 2021 @12:01 AM

Article image
Ofqual plans ‘glide path’ back to pre-Covid exam grading in England
Government aims to avoid sudden drop in GCSE and A-level grades after sharp rises in 2020 and 2021

Richard Adams Education editor

01, Sep, 2021 @6:13 PM