Back Ofqual or I quit, chair of regulator told Gavin Williamson

Exclusive: Roger Taylor demanded education secretary admit Ofqual was behind exams U-turn

The chair of Ofqual threatened to quit this week unless Gavin Williamson publicly backed the exams regulator and admitted it was behind the U-turn that salvaged millions of student grades, the Guardian has learned.

Roger Taylor’s ultimatum came after the education secretary tried to lay the blame for the exams fiasco at the door of Ofqual following a humiliating climbdown that scrapped A-levels and GCSEs awarded by algorithm.

Taylor went directly to Williamson to demand a public statement of support or he would resign. It came the day before hundreds of thousands of pupils in England received their GCSE results.

So serious was the threat of a void at the top of Ofqual that Amanda Spielman, Taylor’s predecessor and now chief inspector of the schools watchdog Ofsted, was being lined up to potentially step in and support the regulator, it is understood. She could still be called on if Taylor or Ofqual’s chief executive, Sally Collier, resigns.

Williamson’s Department for Education (DfE) – after seeking approval from Downing Street – hurriedly issued a statement on Wednesday saying: “We have full confidence in Ofqual and its leadership in their role as independent regulator.”

To placate Taylor, the DfE also confirmed that it had been Ofqual’s decision to drop grades decided by algorithm in favour of grades recommended by teachers, and that it had been backed by the government in doing so.

Roger Taylor, the chair of Ofqual
Roger Taylor, the chair of Ofqual. Photograph: Sky News/PA

Williamson is said to have initially resisted issuing the clarifying statement, wanting Ofqual to “meet him halfway” over who was accountable for the decisions that led to the fiasco that began last week when A-level results were found to disproportionately hit disadvantaged students.

But the government is said to have backed down because it feared further fallout would fatally undermine public confidence in the GCSE results being issued in Ofqual’s name on Thursday, and already being criticised for over-optimistic grading.

Taylor’s threat to resign carried significant weight with ministers because he is a non-executive chair rather than an Ofqual employee. Without the presence of formal constraints on speaking out, he would be free to divulge communications with ministers and criticise the government. Williamson has faced repeated questions as to when he became aware of the algorithm’s flaws.

The revelations cap two weeks of chaos and confusion, and near-universal derision, as ministers insisted on pressing ahead with results based on what is now accepted to have been a flawed algorithm, following school closures and exam cancellations prompted by the coronavirus pandemic.

While Taylor and Williamson apologised to students in public statements on Monday, Collier has made no media appearances despite her duties, including being the public face of the regulator. Sources say that Collier, even before the exam results saga, was not seeking reappointment as chief regulator when her term expires in April next year.

Taylor’s only public comments came on Monday, in TV clips and a statement on Ofqual’s website explaining the decision to ditch the grades generated by its algorithm.

“We understand this has been a distressing time for students, who were awarded exam results last week for exams they never took,” Taylor said before pivoting to blame Williamson. “Ofqual was asked by the secretary of state to develop a system for awarding calculated grades which maintained standards and ensured that grades were awarded broadly in line with previous years.”

With Taylor and Collier – now being advised by the public relations firm Public First – lying low, Williamson and the schools minister, Nick Gibb, did the rounds at radio and TV studios to defend the decision.

While the Guardian had earlier reported that Ofqual’s algorithm would downgrade 39% of grades recommended by teachers, the scale of the disaster became apparent when A-level results were issued on 13 August and parents and students reported bizarre and inexplicable results.

By Monday, Williamson was claiming he had only become aware “over the weekend” of the scale of the problems, and repeatedly declined to say whether he believed Collier should resign as chief executive. He appeared to take credit for the U-turn, saying in interviews on Tuesday there were “large numbers of youngsters … [who] wanted to see action taken, that’s what I’ve done”.

Ofqual’s role came under considerable criticism from Tory MPs, including Robert Halfon, the chair of the Commons education committee, who said the organisation should be wound up and its role taken back within the DfE.

Ofqual was established under Labour as an independent regulator by Ed Balls as education secretary in 2008.

Both Collier and Taylor, alongside ministers, can expect to be grilled by Halfon’s committee when parliament returns next month, assuming both are still in their posts.

Williamson has also come under intense political pressure over his handling of the fiasco, with a string of Conservative MPs, including the minister Penny Mordaunt, going public with their concerns about the discredited algorithm before it was ditched on Monday.

Just two days earlier, after the publication of the results prompted widespread protests from students, parents and teachers, the education secretary had insisted there would be “no U-turn, no change”.

Ofqual published a 300-page explanation of its algorithm alongside the A-level results. The Guardian revealed this week how external advisers told the regulator at least a month ago that its formula for deciding English A-level and GCSE results was “volatile” and risked producing erratic outcomes, according to sources.

One adviser reportedly told the Daily Mail it was evident that the algorithm would fail as soon as schools began submitting their teacher-assessed grades in early June. “There was a very specific point when it became doomed,” he reportedly said. “There was clearly always a potential this could blow, because of the nature of it.”

Angela Rayner, the deputy Labour leader, said: “It is clear that there is a deepening crisis at the heart of government, leaving the public with no faith in the exam process or confidence that ministers have a plan to get our young people back to school in September.

“Instead of passing the buck and failing to take responsibility, we need full transparency from the government about what precisely went wrong and who is responsible.”

Ofqual and Downing Street declined to comment. Ofsted has been approached for comment.

Contributors

Richard Adams and Heather Stewart

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Gavin Williamson seeks to blame Ofqual for exams debacle
Education secretary forced into humiliating reversal on A-level and GCSE grades in England

Heather StewartKate Proctor and Sally Weale

17, Aug, 2020 @8:01 PM

Article image
Gavin Williamson to blame for England exams fiasco, says Ofqual chair
Education secretary called regulator and urged it to scrap new guidelines on appeals, MPs told

Richard Adams Education editor

02, Sep, 2020 @3:12 PM

Article image
A-levels: why has Ofqual suspended its criteria to appeal grades?
DfE did not consult exam regulator on guidance and students must now wait until Ofqual issues revised policy

Richard Adams

16, Aug, 2020 @4:22 PM

Article image
Parents and teachers have lost faith in Gavin Williamson, government told
Unions and MPs say education secretary is unfit to oversee safe return of pupils in England

Jessica Elgot, Sally Weale ,Kate Proctor and Richard Adams

18, Aug, 2020 @7:37 PM

Article image
Williamson told about flaws in A-level model two weeks before results
Exclusive: Ofqual reassured Department for Education that faults could be managed by allowing appeals

Richard Adams and Heather Stewart

01, Sep, 2020 @7:39 PM

Article image
Ofqual ignored exams warning a month ago amid ministers' pressure
Exclusive: Agency said to have been told of risk of erratic outcomes, but was under government pressure on grade inflation

Richard Adams, Jessica Elgot, Heather Stewart and Kate Proctor

19, Aug, 2020 @7:18 PM

Article image
Students in England to sit repeated mock A-levels and GCSEs, Ofqual says
Unions and school leaders critical after regulator publishes long-delayed contingency plan

Richard Adams Education editor

11, Nov, 2021 @5:29 PM

Article image
Ofqual board minutes reveal tensions with DfE ahead of exam results fiasco
Regulator aware A-level and GCSE grade assessment unreliable before results day

Richard Adams Education editor

22, Oct, 2020 @6:20 PM

Article image
Boris Johnson urged to intervene as exam results anger escalates
Labour calls on PM to cancel planned break as Tory MPs deluged with complaints

Richard Adams and Heather Stewart

16, Aug, 2020 @8:00 PM

Article image
Ofqual plans ‘glide path’ back to pre-Covid exam grading in England
Government aims to avoid sudden drop in GCSE and A-level grades after sharp rises in 2020 and 2021

Richard Adams Education editor

01, Sep, 2021 @6:13 PM