Give worse-off students £3,000 to stay in education, says report

In turnaround from Cameron’s scrapped maintenance grants, May says move ‘has not worked’

Disadvantaged students in England could receive grants worth £3,000 a year to encourage them to remain in education after leaving school, according to proposals from a government-commissioned report backed by Theresa May.

The report into post-age 18 education and funding would, if accepted by a future government, see a shift in funding from universities to further education (FE) and vocational training. Universities would lose income for “low value” courses while their graduates would be making higher student loan repayments until the brink of their retirement.

At the launch of the report, May is to say: “My view is very clear: removing maintenance grants from the least well-off students has not worked, and I believe it is time to bring them back.”

May’s remarks are an admission that the decision by David Cameron to scrap student maintenance grants in 2015 was a mistake, with the then chancellor George Osborne calling the support for students from poor backgrounds “unaffordable”.

The report, headed by Philip Augar, was commissioned by May to look at high student debt and tuition fees following a pledge she gave to the Conservative party conference in 2017. But the report’s publication was delayed multiple times, overshadowed by the Brexit negotiations and technical issues.

Among the report’s proposals are:

• cutting undergraduate tuition fees to £7,500

• extending student loan repayments from 30 to 40 years

• a single, lifelong learning loan allowance for all adults

• maintenance loans for students taking sub-degree qualifications

• rebranding student loans as “student contributions”

• funding boost for FE colleges and vocational training

Angela Rayner, Labour’s shadow education secretary, said: “The report alone does nothing to address the burning injustices facing our education system.

“With no formal government response, no extra funding and no guarantee that the recommendations will be implemented by her successor, the Augar review epitomises May’s legacy as prime minister and this shambolic Tory government; all talk, empty promises and very little action.”

Shakira Martin, president of the National Union of Students (NUS), said: “This announcement is too little too late, given that Theresa May’s legacy in higher education will always be the deportation of thousands of our international student friends and colleagues.”

The report calls for greater government intervention in the funding and types of courses offered by universities, while its proposal for undergraduate tuition fees in England to be cut from £9,250 to £7,500 a year would likely mean reduced income for humanities and social science departments.

A young woman takes a book from a shelf.
Reduced undergraduate tuition fees in England could mean less income for humanities departments. Photograph: Myron Standret/Alamy

The panel declared that “some students are charged too much for their degrees and the substantial taxpayer subsidy could be better directed …. to courses which cost more to deliver and offer better value to students and taxpayers.”

The report also recommended that the government could impose number controls and a minimum entry threshold for degree courses with poor student retention and graduate employment records.

University leaders were quick to push back against the funding proposals, with some fearing that it would also affect universities in Scotland and Wales.

“On the face of it, the fee-level recommendations may look good for students, but unless the government gives a cast-iron guarantee on full replacement funding, it could prove to be a wolf in sheep’s clothing,” said Alistair Jarvis, chief executive of the Universities UK lobby group.

“Cutting fees without replacement funding would be a political choice which hurts students, limits opportunity, damages universities, decreases the number of highly-skilled employees that business needs, and reduces our international competitiveness at a time when modern Britain needs it most.”

While students would leave university with lower overall debt, the proposals would see graduates making higher total repayments for longer than under the current structure, with the student loan period being extended from 30 to 40 years and coupled with a lower starting threshold for repayments.

The extended repayment period would see most graduates paying off their student loans until they reached their 60s, rather than having the remainder of their student debt wiped in their early 50s as now.

There was surprise that the panel made few recommendations on changes to the high rates of interest charged on student loans.

Andrew McGettigan, an independent expert who specialises in the student finance system, said: “The government would do well to ignore this and lower interest rates to inflation only – it’s the key contributor to misunderstandings over the student loan system.”

But the big winners under the report would be the further education and vocational training sectors, which would see additional funding of around £3bn a year and a one-off £1bn capital funding boost for a national network of FE colleges.

Damian Hinds, the education secretary for England, said: “This report acknowledges fully the key truth that our further education colleges also play a vital role in performing these functions.

“Too often we have had in our country a bias towards higher education, but we need to recognise equally the opportunities in both.”

Describing further education as “the Cinderella sector,” Augar said: “Our work revealed that post-18 education in England is a story of both care and neglect, depending on whether students are amongst the 50% of young people who participate in higher education or the rest.

“The panel believes that this disparity simply has to be addressed. Doing so is a matter of fairness and equity and is likely to bring considerable social and economic benefits to individuals, employers and the country at large.”

Chris Husbands, the vice-chancellor of Sheffield Hallam University, welcomed the encouragement for part-time and flexible study but said he feared that much of it would not survive the current political instability.

“My big worry is that this report is going to get cherry-picked by politicians and we will end up with something that doesn’t work,” Husbands said.


Richard Adams, Education editor

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Treasury expected to balk at further education loan plans
Gavin Williamson hails plans for ‘lifelong loan entitlement’ but Treasury is hostile to expanding system

Richard Adams and Sally Weale

21, Jan, 2021 @5:17 PM

Article image
Universities call for return of maintenance grants for students in England
Steve West, head of Universities UK, urges government to deliver new model of higher education funding

Richard Adams Education editor

08, Sep, 2022 @4:58 PM

Article image
UK universities facing £760m hit as one in five students plan to defer
Exclusive: undergraduates to delay enrolment if classes stay online and activities are curbed

Richard Adams Education editor

20, May, 2020 @7:00 PM

Article image
Ministers’ loan plans could stop poorer students in England going to university
Government to consult on making eligibility for finance dependent on strong exam grades

Richard Adams and Sally Weale

22, Feb, 2022 @9:44 PM

Article image
Degrees underfunded by £1,750 per student, Russell Group says
Group says deficit would widen to £4,000 under plan to freeze tuition fees in England until 2024-25

Richard Adams Education editor

04, May, 2022 @11:01 PM

Article image
Post-18 education review: the changes and the effects they may have
Almost three years after Agur review, government unveils plans for tuition fees and student loans in England

Richard Adams Education editor

24, Feb, 2022 @5:42 PM

Article image
Liam Byrne: 'government is poisoning roots of higher education'

The damage being done to universities is frankly alarming, writes Labour's spokesman on higher education

Liam Byrne

10, Feb, 2014 @3:28 PM

Article image
Early 2000s baby boom will soon flood UK universities, warns former Tory minister
Expansion in education must be funded to avert young people getting stuck in low-paid work, says David Willetts

Richard Adams Education editor

15, Oct, 2021 @5:00 AM

Article image
Autumn statement: for and against Osborne's higher education plans

The freeing of student number controls funded by a loan book sale may be a landmark proposal but will it work in practice?

Martin McQuillan and John Vinney

09, Dec, 2013 @1:51 PM

Article image
Increasing England student loan repayments ‘would save government £4bn a year’
Architect of current system claims lowering income threshold for repayments is fairest way to fund higher education

Richard Adams Education editor

10, Jun, 2021 @6:06 AM