University strikes offer a lesson in principles, pay and pensions | Letter

Academics respond to coverage about the ongoing disruption and suggest ways to resolve the issues

Your editorial is right to emphasise the wider issues in the strike by university lecturers and support services (Lecturers have a just cause in this important battle for the soul of the campus, 26 November). But the pensions issue still lies at the heart of the dispute.

With a few retired colleagues, we have been attempting to persuade both the University and College Union (UCU) and the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) to deal with the serious generational unfairness that has caused the need for additional contributions to the pension fund.

Current lecturers have already had their pension rights severely reduced in order to maintain the highly beneficial pension rights of those of us who have already retired, are living longer than expected and have not contributed enough while we were working to pay for our benefits. What is needed is a genuine effort to share the burden of paying for adequate pensions for us all, rather than gold-plated ones for those already retired and seriously reduced rights for those paying for it.

We have established that this can be done within the current law, but neither the UCU nor USS seem ready to work together to devise a fairer generational distribution of the costs and benefits of the pension system. The joint negotiating committee needs to work more seriously on the principles established by the joint expert panel on fund valuation last year.
Tom Hadden Emeritus professor, Queen’s University Belfast and David McLellan Emeritus professor, University of Kent

• As teachers, researchers and professional staff from across the UK, we endeavour to provide world-leading education for our students. However, this has become increasingly difficult in the current higher education climate – and this is why we are on strike.

A report published by the Universities and Colleges Employers Association showed that staff pay has dropped a staggering 17% in real terms since 2009. The USS pension reforms have meant that while worker contributions are going up, retired lecturers will be bringing home about £12,000 less per year.

In addition, a disgraceful gender and race pay gap means that male colleagues are, on average, getting paid 15% more than female colleagues, while colleagues of colour are 10% more likely to be on temporary contracts.

We also condemn the strong-arm tactics of universities that have encouraged students to report striking members of staff, threatened significant pay reductions in action short of strike, and told international students that their visas would be at risk if they supported the pickets.

These conditions are all part of the marketisation of universities. Evidence of this transformation includes the “managerial models of private and especially public sector corporations”, the research excellence framework and teaching excellence framework exercises carried out in universities, the inveterate university rankings, the introduction and increase of tuition fees, and cuts to courses and contact hours.

All this amid a looming mental health crisis among university students and the expanding casualisation of higher education staff, whereby 70% of research staff are on temporary contracts, while 37,000 teaching staff in universities are on hourly paid contracts. Many are not entitled to holiday pay, annual leave or a pension. Defying other university leaders, Anthony Forster, vice-chancellor at the University of Essex, claimed that employers can actually afford to pay more to USS, and by so doing could avoid widespread disruption. Voices like these actually represent 40,000 of our colleagues and offer a more hopeful future for today’s and tomorrow’s students.
Professor Gargi Bhattacharyya Sociology, University of East London
Professor Ambreena Manji Law, University of Cardiff
Professor Akwugo Emejulu Sociology, University of Warwick
Professor Gurminder Bhambra Sociology, University of Sussex
Professor Emily Grabham Law, University of Kent
Dr Priyamvada Gopal English, University of Cambridge
Professor Khaled Fahmy Asian and Middle Eastern studies, University of Cambridge
Professor Debbie Lisle International relations, Queen’s University Belfast
Professor Neve Gordon International law, Queen Mary University of London
Professor John Holmwood Sociology, University of Nottingham
Dr Ruth Fletcher Law, Queen Mary University of London
Dr Eva Nanopoulos Law, Queen Mary University of London
Dr Isobel Roele Law, Queen Mary University of London
Professor Tim Morris Physics, Southampton University
Professor Keston Sutherland Poetics, University of Sussex
Professor Alan Bogg Law, University of Bristol
Professor Clément Mouhot Maths, University of Cambridge
Professor Tobias Kelly Anthropology, University of Edinburgh
Professor Matthew Beaumont English, University College London
Professor Gregory Claeys History, Royal Holloway, University of London
Professor Natalie Fention Media, communications and cultural studies, Goldsmiths, University of London
Professor Roberto Veneziani Economics and finance, Queen Mary University of London
Conor Crummey Law, Queen Mary University of London
Dr Tanzil Chowdhury Law, Queen Mary University of London
Professor Catherine Rottenberg American and Canadian Studies, University of Nottingham

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Guardian view on university strikes: another winter of campus discontent | Editorial
Editorial: The deterioration of pay and conditions has hammered staff morale. Students will feel the effects

Editorial

07, Nov, 2021 @6:25 PM

Article image
Accountability and UK university governance | Letters
Letters: Six professors emeriti from the University of Bath on the remuneration committee’s meeting this week, and other views on vice-chancellors’ pay

Letters

12, Mar, 2018 @5:51 PM

Article image
University staff are right to be striking | Letters
Letters: There is no justification for this pension attack – USS’s finances are strong, argue 153 university academics

Letters

30, Jan, 2018 @6:13 PM

Article image
George Orwell was right, private schools bar moves towards a fairer society | Letters
Letters: Jol Miskin and Margaret Tulloch on what Labour may do about private education, and Robert Harding and John Lancaster on the Oxbridge intake from state schools

Letters

15, Sep, 2019 @3:47 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on universities: a bailout is in all our interests | Editorial
Editorial: By helping to solve a short-term funding crisis, ministers could signal their plans for a national recovery

Editorial

24, Apr, 2020 @5:25 PM

Article image
Education’s value to society is lost amid focus on graduate salaries | Letters
Letters from Pete Dorey, Christine Hawkes, Bernie Evans, Prof Colin Richards and Dr Nick Pratt

Letters

03, Dec, 2018 @5:39 PM

Article image
Higher education reform is our priority | Letter from Robert Halfon MP
Letter: The cross-party education select committee firmly believes that if students are going to take on the big burden of a loan, there must surely be a good graduate job at the end of it, writes Robert Halfon MP

Letters

07, Nov, 2018 @6:24 PM

Article image
The true value of higher education | Letter
Letter: A university education is a public good and not a plaything for the exchequer, writes Prof Des Freedman

Letters

05, Mar, 2020 @6:18 PM

Article image
University grade inflation under the spotlight | Letters
Letters: Readers respond as ministers promise to address concerns over the growing number of first-class degrees

Letters

28, Oct, 2018 @5:36 PM

Article image
Myths around further education policy and student targets | Letters
Letters: David Blunkett reacts to Gavin Williamson’s comments about graduates in non-graduate jobs. Philip Knowles points out that the target was for 50% of young people to go into higher education, not just university

Letters

10, Jul, 2020 @3:35 PM