Who’s the minister who could kill or save a university? Oh dear, a Thatcherite | Peter Scott

Chris Skidmore believes in the smallest possible state. Is he going to rescue higher education from market meltdown?

We are now on our third universities minister since the Conservatives shed their pesky Liberal Democrat partners following the 2015 election. The first two were victims of the Brexit Moloch. First up was Jo Johnson, who piloted the Higher Education and Research Act through parliament, only to be rewarded with relegation as minister for London. He resigned in the summer and is now a fully signed-up supporter of the “people’s vote”.

Next up was Sam Gyimah, who in the end found the contradiction between his responsibility to do the best by universities and the damage Brexit would cause too much to take and also resigned. He, too, supports a second referendum.

Now we have Chris Skidmore MP, a Christ Church, Oxford, old boy and popular historian. But it is doubtful whether his books on Queen Elizabeth 1 and Robert Dudley or Richard III indicate much empathy for universities caught up in the meltdown of a flawed higher education “market”.

The signs are not good. Skidmore is a born-again Thatcherite, a founding member of the rightwing Free Enterprise Group of Tory MPs and a co-author of the notorious Britannia Unchained, a polemic in favour of the smallest possible state. To be fair, he is said to have voted remain in the 2016 referendum.

But the issue is not Brexit, just for a moment. It is that Skidmore will be the minister who receives the report of the Augar committee on fees and funding, probably in February. Augar always faced a dilemma, like Brexit. Just as we can’t have our cake and eat it, so we can’t move back to a more managed and calmer system of higher education while retaining a dynamic but damaging market.

There are second-order issues on which Augar can make useful recommendations, such as tweaking student loan repayments by graduates, or boosting grants for poorer students. But the big issue that cannot be fudged is fees, which Labour promises to abolish.

The committee’s widely trailed recommendation is to reduce the maximum fee to £6,500. The immediate effect would be to plunge some universities into financial crisis, unless the government filled the gap with increased public funding. This is close to unimaginable. Cuts in school budgets have become a key political battleground. Universities are widely seen as having never had it so good since 2010, while further education has endured savage cuts, a view that becomes irresistible if student loans have to be accounted for as public spending rather than hidden off-balance sheet.

But the signs of market meltdown are everywhere: over-borrowing by some universities (too many cranes on campus), dangerous deficits even with a £9,000 fee, dumbing down of “good” degrees, an explosion of unconditional offers.

What will the government do? Allow significant institutions to go bankrupt? The regulator, the Office for Students, has neither the will nor the power to intervene, as the former funding council did, to provide bridging support and orchestrate mergers. The decision whether to let universities go under will end up on the minister’s desk.

Is the government prepared to crack down on the game-playing that accompanies the National Student Survey, the Teaching Excellence Framework and rankings generally, as Ofsted is doing in schools? That is not likely to appeal to a small-state Skidmore opposed to restrictions on the free market.

Then there is a final problem. As the state has accumulated ever-greater powers, the turnover of responsible ministers has accelerated. David Willetts, for whom Skidmore was once a policy adviser, was universities minister for the full span of the coalition government, and had spent even longer as a shadow minister. Skidmore will barely have time to read his brief before facing key decisions, at a time when black-hole Brexit is sucking in all the government’s energy. Let us hope he is a quick learner.


Peter Scott

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Augar report pits arts against sciences – and both lose out | Simon Marginson
Cutting fees for arts and humanities degrees would damage Stem subjects too

Simon Marginson

11, Jun, 2019 @5:45 AM

Article image
A university place for all is the way to abolish tuition fees | Nick Hillman
If higher education had comprehensive coverage like state schools, arguments for taxpayer funding could triumph

Nick Hillman

12, Mar, 2019 @6:45 AM

Article image
University mergers: academics fight to be heard in marriage of minds
As financial difficulties take their toll, more mergers like that between UCL and the Institute of Education look inevitable – or will private equity firms step in?

Anna Fazackerley

18, Apr, 2017 @5:45 AM

Article image
University chiefs angry over ‘elitist’ student loan plans
Proposals to bar students without three Ds at A-level would hit courses such as nursing and ‘strike at heart of social mobility’

Anna Fazackerley

08, Jan, 2019 @7:00 AM

Article image
Universities condemn ‘catastrophic’ plan to link fees to graduate pay
Academics say Augar proposals could damage arts degrees and lose Britain its creative edge

Anna Fazackerley

11, Jun, 2019 @6:00 AM

Article image
The Augar report on higher education has a sting in its tail | Jonathan Wolff
The proposals are significantly regressive, increasing total payments made by lower earners, such as teachers and nurses

Jonathan Wolff

04, Jun, 2019 @6:00 AM

Article image
Everything must be measured: how mimicking business taints universities | Jonathan Wolff
Research and teaching are suffering as a result of target-setting, casualisation and sharp practices

Jonathan Wolff

08, Aug, 2017 @6:15 AM

Article image
Ideological shakeup will create a ‘squeezed middle’ of universities | Peter Scott
Current changes to the structure of higher education are not the work of a sensible state, but a silly one

Peter Scott

07, Mar, 2017 @7:15 AM

Article image
This bad bill will put universities on the road to serfdom
The higher education bill is a shocker: do ministers really need the powers of ‘entry and search’?

Peter Scott

07, Jun, 2016 @11:00 AM

Article image
Higher education needs new answers to its perennial funding crisis | Jonathan Wolff
Brexit is likely to reduce the number of high-fee students, and neither donations nor industry have eased the financial pressure on universities

Jonathan Wolff

16, Aug, 2016 @6:15 AM