History lessons about comprehensive schools | Letters

Readers respond to Afua Hirsch’s article about the state of our education system

Afua Hirsch (Free education is disappearing before our eyes, 28 November) contrasts the current state of education with that ushered in by the 1944 Education Act, which she writes established comprehensive schools. Having been a schoolboy at the time and later a teacher I feel the need to put straight that part of the record.

Up to then the state system consisted of two very distinct parts: elementary, dating from 1870, and secondary (ie grammar schools), dating from 1902. For elementary pupils the leaving age was 14 and the curriculum was narrow, and many of the older grammar schools charged fees. The 1944 act introduced free secondary education for all, abolishing grammar school fees, raising the leaving age to 15, and turning elementary schools into secondary moderns, with a much wider curriculum. The idea of comprehensive schools came from local authorities such as the London county council soon afterwards, gradually spreading to most of England and Wales. Ms Hirsch might be surprised to learn that a handful of authorities, notably Kent and Buckinghamshire, still have no comprehensive schools.

I fully endorse the points she makes about parental contributions for things that should be free and expensive extras that are totally out of reach for many parents. The annual “school journey” at my grammar school was unaffordable, as was the school scout troop and its camp. It is no surprise that I chose the school cadet force – all free, including the camp. Having said that, I must give credit to our German teacher who in 1950 organised a cycling trip to Germany, on which the accommodation was in affordable youth hostels and the only transport cost was the Dover-Ostend ferry.
Les Masters
Weston-super-Mare, Somerset

• Afua Hirsch touches on the drift in state schools towards the creation of “top tiers”. In fact, setting in secondary comprehensive schools has been the norm for many years and the practice of mixed-ability teaching and learning are rarely seen. Yet, so-called “mixed ability” class organisation is surely the most effective way to provide pupils with equal learning opportunities.

When I became head of English, I introduced mixed-ability English teaching from years 7 to 11 in a comprehensive school serving a very diverse catchment. There are numerous types of “intelligence”; that intelligence can be stimulated and is not a static commodity and therefore a “good” teacher, with skill in motivating pupils, can help intelligences grow. Classes were organised to ensure as “comprehensive” a range of previous achievement as possible. The curriculum was planned to offer quality experiences, challenges, stimulus and interest. Learning was based on negotiation and choice, class, group and independent work, a lot of discussion, sharing of work, analysis and evaluation. It was demanding of teachers but fun. For pupils it meant that any member of class could, at times, shine; that all could learn from others and that none need feel a “failure”.

One treasured moment was when a pupil, who would have been conventionally termed “non-academic”, presented me with a folder of her poems; poems she had composed because she wanted, perhaps needed, to. By any standards they were outstanding: imaginative, memorable and very moving.
David Curtis
Solihull, West Midlands

• As one of the first of the “Butler boys”, who started at Shooters’ Hill grammar school in 1945, I will be forever grateful to my mother, who refused to accept the place I was given in a secondary modern upon returning, late, from evacuation out of London. There were no “comprehensive” alternatives. This “intellectual segregation” was the only reality then and it’s what selective systems are all about. The destruction of the comprehensive revolution of the 60s and 70s plus their deliberate underfunding has restored a largely covert, but nonetheless powerful selective system, which has never really gone away. In reality there have been very few truly comprehensive schools in our class-ridden and unequal society.
Tony Mitchell
Keynsham, Somerset

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters

• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Gradgrind ethos spells hard times for schools | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to Simon Jenkins’ article about the school system and helping children with special educational needs

Letters

29, Oct, 2018 @5:08 PM

Article image
Tough lessons from academy schools | Letters
Letters: Dr Simon Gibbs says the number of children permanently excluded is rising, while Dr Michael Cross offers solutions to ‘zombie’ schools

Letters

22, Apr, 2019 @4:29 PM

Article image
No good comes out of putting schools and pupils down | Letters
Letters: Salina Docherty and Dr Jane Poyner say a Somerset infant school has been unfairly rated by Ofsted. Likewise, Jan Shapiro, headteacher of Addey and Stanhope School in Lewisham, says hers is not one of the worst schools but one of the best

Letters

04, Feb, 2018 @5:22 PM

Article image
Imaginative lessons and teacher-awarded exam grades | Letters
Letters: Rob Watling thinks an education secretary with imagination could transform this summer for children, while Philip C Stenning calls for moderation. Plus letters from Dr Cary Bazalgette and Sarah James

Letters

26, Feb, 2021 @5:13 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on schools: boost children, not results | Editorial
Editorial: In revealing the appalling treatment of children forced out by a top grammar school, a new report has highlighted the broader problem of ‘off-rolling’

Editorial

11, Jul, 2018 @5:18 PM

Article image
Obsession with grammar schools just leaves poor children behind | Letters
Letters: Dr John Somers reflects on his path not taken, and Katy Simmons writes of the schools that are missing out

Letters

10, Dec, 2018 @5:13 PM

Article image
Shortsighted approach to transforming schools in England | Letters
Letters: Readers react to Gavin Williamson’s proposals for education reform, suggesting ways to bring about real change and highlighting the merits of a five-term academic year

Letters

08, Mar, 2021 @5:27 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on calls to reopen schools: a dangerous distraction | Editorial
Editorial: With more than 1,000 deaths from Covid every day for weeks, talk of looser restrictions is reckless. The prime minister should ignore his backbenchers

Editorial

25, Jan, 2021 @7:08 PM

Article image
Grammar schools created lasting divisions | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to a piece by Joan Bakewell on the impact of the 1944 Education Act and the 11-plus exam

Letters

10, May, 2020 @4:14 PM

Article image
Funding and staff levels in schools at crisis point | Letters
Letters: School governors urge the government to ‘stop ducking its responsibilities’ and provide essential funding

Letters

11, Mar, 2019 @6:21 PM