MPs should note local opinion on grammar schools | Letters

Letters: In 1970 the pro-comprehensive lobbying of parents and teachers around the country was so successful that many Conservative areas recognised the folly of continuing the 11-plus

Theresa May’s prejudice-based proposal to expand selective schools throughout England will probably fail in parliament. But it is worth recalling that in 1970, when I was an education correspondent and the Heath government was just elected, a group of Guardian reporters and I covered the pro-comprehensive lobbying of parents and teachers around the country.

Their efforts were so successful that many Conservative areas recognised the folly of continuing the 11-plus and, as Martin Kettle writes (May is going where Cameron and Thatcher feared to tread, 10 September), the education secretary, Margaret Thatcher, closed more grammar schools and opened more comprehensives than any minister before or since. The education scene has changed enormously, and the local education committees, which used to be responsible for schools in their areas, are no more. But MPs should be reminded of the weight of local opinion, from parents, teachers and grandparents, who would never vote for a return to the discredited past.
Richard Bourne
(Guardian education correspondent, 1968-72) London

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Grammar schools and Britain’s stagnant social mobility | Letters
Letters: If we were serious about increasing social mobility we would scrap university fees and invest in education from the cradle to the grave

Letters

12, Sep, 2016 @5:40 PM

Article image
Theresa May and the myth of inclusive grammar schools | Letters
Letters: I visited Eton college last year. I’d like that for everyone, without selection. Money please?

Letters

08, Sep, 2016 @6:42 PM

Article image
Our education system is failing. It’s time to give grammar schools a go | Letters
Letters: Too many politicians and commentators accept the status quo for the maintained sector because they are wealthy enough to opt out of it

Letters

10, Mar, 2017 @6:14 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on grammar schools: the wrong answer but the right question | Editorial
Editorial: Nostalgia for a discredited system expresses genuine anxiety about social mobility. That demands a more evidence-led solution from the prime minister

Editorial

08, Sep, 2016 @6:53 PM

Article image
Good comprehensives deserve high praise | Letters
Letters: Schools with an unbalanced intake have a much tougher task on their hands

Letters

17, Oct, 2016 @6:42 PM

Article image
Faulty science behind a ‘superior education’ at grammar school? | Letter
Letter: Two basic errors are shown in your picture of a science lesson at a grammar school

Letter

11, Sep, 2016 @5:34 PM

Article image
Theresa May’s grammar school vanity project will institutionalise failure | Letters
Letters: There is no better way of depressing the prospects of most 11-year-old children than ensuring the failure of those children at such an early age

Letters

14, Apr, 2017 @5:30 PM

Article image
Winning the schools and youth lottery | Letters
Letters: Lotteries are only a solution if they are used in conjunction with outreach work

Letters

15, Mar, 2017 @6:16 PM

Article image
Grammar schools don’t help social mobility – we need to start earlier | Melissa Benn
Not even Theresa May’s predecessors agree on bringing back the 11-plus. All the evidence shows life chances are determined by the age of five

Melissa Benn

06, Sep, 2016 @7:38 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Theresa May’s schools speech: a divisive blueprint| Editorial
Editorial: The prime minister is right to want schools to do a better job in helping social mobility. More grammar schools will have the opposite effect

Editorial

09, Sep, 2016 @5:53 PM