Good advice is key to pupils’ university progress | Letters

Letters: State schools just need significantly increased investment in high-quality guidance, for the expertise and passion for excellence and aspiration is there

Paul Mason (Private schools know how to game elite universities – state-educated kids don’t have this privilege, G2, 1 December) has succumbed to crude class-based generalisations, increasingly the default response in the private school v state school debate that the media is so fond of. Paul Mason claims that state-educated 16-year-olds make A-level choices based on “hearsay, myth and information that is outdated”, whereas private-school students happily rely on their teachers’ “years of practical knowledge” and “continual informal contact with elite universities”. In my experience as a recently retired deputy head of a large state school which published a successful national guide to succeeding at competitive university interviews and secured 17 Oxbridge offers last year – and as someone who has met many well-informed and committed heads of sixth and advisers in the state sector – the truth is not as simplistic.

The real division is not between state and private but between schools that provide high-quality, personalised up-to-date advice and information, and those that do not. The independent sector has quite a few of the latter, as does the state sector, which under this government has suffered devastating cuts to careers and higher education advice.

I do agree with Mr Mason’s conclusion – the system often does fail “bright kids from non-privileged backgrounds” – but let us not lazily assume the independent sector has all the answers here; state schools just need significantly increased investment in high-quality guidance, especially for 15- and 16-year-olds, for the expertise and passion for excellence and aspiration is there.
Tim Miller

• Paul Mason is probably right. Our society and our economy are being deprived of talent by the exclusive access to universities afforded to the privately educated. This unequal access affects not only the quality and scope of our existing and future judges, diplomats, civil servants and politicians, but also our journalists and editors, our senior broadcasters, actors and even our popular musicians. The answer is not to get a bit more information to state schools, as Mason suggests, nor to go cap in hand to the private sector, as our privately educated shadow education secretary would have us do, but to do what Margaret Drabble proposed: get rid of their charitable status. And stop pandering to the veneer presented at interview panels and auditions.
Arthur Gould
Loughborough, Leicestershire

• For too long state-school pupils have received poor advice regarding the facilitating subjects at GCSE and A-level that will help them progress to the top universities and keep their options open. To help tackle youth unemployment and ensure that students receive the degrees and qualifications that will lead to employment, Russell Group universities must develop a closer relationship with state schools and their careers advisers to ensure that accurate information about required GCSE and A-level subject choices are clear, so that students can make informed choices from as early as year 8. Often, by the time students receive this information at age 16 or 17, it may be too late.
Brenda King
Chief executive, ACDiversity

• Bravo to Michael Rosen for highlighting the hypocrisy of coalition education policy and the folly of the free school zealots (Letter from a curious parent, 2 December). Is it too much to hope that Tristram Hunt might agree with him?
Brian Donnelly
Birkby, Cumbria

• What I don’t understand is why there seems to be no one (or rather few) in Britain questioning the whole premise that choices you make aged 16 should decide your future. When I was 16 I wanted to be an actor, of course. At 16 nothing seems quite right in your life, and the idea of slipping in and out of the lives of other characters appealed to me. Well, thank goodness I didn’t have to make the choices then that kids at English schools have to. I’m from Germany and there we’re made to study around 10 subjects until the very end of school. We choose two or three subjects to take at an advanced level, but all other subjects – from sciences, to languages, politics, history, PE, ethics, etc – are still mandatory. And the qualification gained at the end enables you to apply to any university course you want. I did advanced English and German, but could have applied to do almost anything at a German university: medicine, engineering, informatics, or graphic design.

I feel that giving young people a broad, well-rounded education that will enable them to turn to almost any subject in their higher education has greater value than forcing them to make decisions when lots of them will not be ready (how could they be?), and that could go on to restrict what they can apply to do at university.
Anita Klingler
Griesheim, Hesse, Germany

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Private schools know how to game elite universities – state-educated kids don’t have this privilege
Paul Mason: The system fails bright pupils from ordinary backgrounds. And here’s how we all lose ...

Paul Mason

30, Nov, 2014 @8:00 PM

Article image
Clearing 2012: get A-level advice from Ucas and university admissions experts

Post your questions now to get advice on how to survive results day

Rebecca Ratcliffe

10, Aug, 2012 @4:23 PM

Article image
University clearing: thousands wait nervously for a place on a course
Ucas system glitch frustrates students as admission confirmation is delayed after A-level results

Jeevan Vasagar, education editor

16, Aug, 2012 @7:35 PM

Article image
University admissions changes are scrapped
Plans for pupils to apply to university after A-levels have been ditched, as Ucas review finds 'insurmountable' problems

Jessica Shepherd

27, Mar, 2012 @11:32 PM

Article image
Oxford University data shows private school A-level pupils' advantage
Latest figures show private school pupils 9% more likely to be admitted than those at a state school with same grades

Kurien Parel and Richard Adams

14, Aug, 2013 @11:27 PM

Article image
‘I ran to the toilet and cried.’ A-level students whose results were a lesson in life
It won’t all be good news for A-level students on Thursday. But many who go through this find it helps them to mature

Lucy Tobin

15, Aug, 2017 @6:29 AM

Article image
I turned down all my university offers – and I don't regret it
It’s A-level results day soon and I’m excited for all my friends heading off to uni, but I’m not ready and don’t know if I ever will be

Aisling Wood

10, Aug, 2017 @10:05 AM

Letters: Right time to apply for university
Letters: I think this would be better for students than making a panic choice in clearing, and would allow universities to manage places like seats on a plane, where the price and number are known

15, Sep, 2011 @8:00 PM

Article image
Unconditional love: the university offers pupils can’t refuse
More A-level students than ever have received unconditional offers, many at the last minute. But is it always a good thing?

Anna Fazackerley

15, Aug, 2017 @6:00 AM

Article image
Universities urged to lower entry grades for comprehensive school pupils
Study finds pupils from non-selective state schools have greater potential and success than grammar and private school peers

Richard Adams, education editor

06, Jun, 2014 @10:23 PM