Natural History Museum under fire for gagging clause with Danish oil sponsor

Wildlife photography contest that was subject to the agreement described environmental impact of oil rigs in positive light

The Natural History Museum has been denounced for signing a contract with a gagging clause that prevented it from criticising a Danish oil company that sponsored its wildlife photography competition.

The clause was put into a contract with Dong Energy in 2016 when the company was heavily invested in oil and gas. Dong changed its name to Ørsted in 2017 when it divested of fossil fuels to focus on renewables.

By signing the contract, which was obtained by the investigative journalism organisation Point Source and shared with the Observer, the Natural History Museum agreed to refrain from making “any statement” that would “damage the reputation” of the company.

The company has sponsored the Wildlife Photographer of the Year competition since 2016, and its current agreement runs until September 2023.

One wall text at the 2016 exhibition stated: “Drilling for oil is not generally considered beneficial for wildlife, yet oil rigs can provide shelter and a rich food supply for many animals including Brandt’s cormorants.”

The text was for an image titled “Rig Diver”, taken by the British photographer Alex Mustard and showing a bird hunting fish beneath an offshore oil platform. The exhibition did not provide any context about the oil industry’s negative environmental impact on marine ecosystems.

In 2016 Dong operated an oil and gas business in the North Sea worth more than $1bn (£830m).

Under the current contract, the Natural History Museum is not permitted to “make any statement or issue any publicity which may reasonably be foreseen as discrediting or damaging the reputation” of the company.

The use of the gagging clause has led to accusations of greenwashing by environmental groups and raised concerns about how large corporations can use sponsorship money to influence public discourse about environmental issues.

The campaign group Fossil Free London is calling for all British museums and art institutions to stop signing contracts with large corporations that contain this kind of gagging clause. Robin Wells, a spokesperson, said: “It is totally unacceptable that, when the public walk through the doors of British museums, the information they consume is being controlled by large corporations.”

In a statement, the Natural History Museum said it retains editorial control over all its exhibitions and denied the suggestion that sponsors have any influence over its content.Clauses such as this are standard for corporate partnerships but, as they can be open to misinterpretation with regards to the absolute editorial control we retain, we no longer include them in new agreements.”

A spokesperson for Ørsted said: “We would not seek to influence the Natural History Museum’s views or limit its ability to provide its usual high standard of independent, critical, fact-based commentary on any aspect of the energy industry sector, should it choose to do so.”

• This article was amended on 8 January 2023. A previous version inadvertently omitted details of Ørsted’s divestment from fossil fuels in 2017, and to state that the image “Rig Diver” was exhibited in 2016; references to a “gagging order” in the text and headline were changed to “gagging clause”; and part of a statement from the Natural History Museum, clarifying that such clauses were no longer used in new contracts, was restored having been omitted owing to a production error.


Wil Crisp

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Natural History Museum evolves into theatre to stage Darwin puppet show
Australian writer persuaded museum to convert gallery for run of acclaimed production

Vanessa Thorpe

26, Aug, 2018 @6:00 AM

Article image
The Guardian view on skating at the Natural History Museum: on thin ice | Editorial
Editorial: The museum has a key role to play in public education. But that doesn’t just happen in the galleries and exhibition spaces


21, Dec, 2015 @6:57 PM

Article image
Natural History Museum: A £78m metamorphosis

Where can you find 17m bugs and 200 scientists inside a giant cocoon? Jonathan Glancey takes a look around the extraordinary new Darwin extension

Jonathan Glancey

08, Sep, 2008 @1:46 PM

Natural History Museum to cut 'up to 40 jobs'
Fears that entire research unit could be shut as director plans £2.3m cuts to prepare for public spending decisions

Anushka Asthana

12, Jun, 2010 @11:06 PM

Article image
UK urged to follow Denmark in ending North Sea oil and gas exploration
Britain’s credibility as climate champion rests on bold and urgent action, say campaigners

Toby Helm and Robin McKie

06, Dec, 2020 @9:00 AM

Article image
Dippy’s last days: diplodocus leaves London after 112 years for farewell UK tour
Replica dinosaur makes way for blue whale skeleton in Natural History Museum

Tracy McVeigh

01, Jan, 2017 @12:03 AM

Article image
‘The sheer scale is extraordinary’: meet the titanosaur that dwarfs Dippy the diplodocus
One of the largest creatures to have walked the Earth is to become the Natural History Museum’s new star attraction

Robin McKie Science Editor

26, Nov, 2022 @1:00 PM

Article image
Natural History Museum’s wildlife garden: fury at ‘urban redesign’ plan
Bosses say revamp is vital to cope with increasing visitor numbers

Jamie Doward

03, Oct, 2015 @8:41 PM

Article image
Environmental activists challenge ‘unlawful’ UK fossil fuel plan in high court
Climate campaigners claim the government is giving billions of pounds in subsidies to oil and gas producers

Robin McKie Science Editor

04, Dec, 2021 @1:01 PM

Article image
Tiny traces of DNA found in cave dust may unlock secret life of Neanderthals
Advanced technique used to recover genetic material may help solve the mystery of early humans

Robin McKie Science editor

16, May, 2021 @8:45 AM