Science Museum sponsorship deal with oil firm included gag clause

Exclusive: museum in London agreed to take care not to say anything that could damage sponsor Equinor’s reputation

The Science Museum in London signed a sponsorship contract containing a gagging clause with the Norwegian oil and gas company Equinor, agreeing to take care not to say anything that could damage the firm’s reputation, it can be revealed.

The agreement, a copy of which was obtained by the Guardian and the investigative journalism organisation Point Source, concerned sponsorship of the museum’s current Wonderlab exhibition.

It stated that the Science Museum and its trustees must take reasonable care to “not at any time” during the exhibition term “make any statement or issue any publicity or otherwise be involved in any conduct or matter that may reasonably be foreseen as discrediting or damaging the goodwill or reputation of the sponsor”.

Equinor told the Guardian it had been a standard clause in the museum’s contract, rather than one the company suggested.

The inclusion of the so-called non-disparagement clause has led to accusations of greenwashing from environmental groups.

Equinor was known as Statoil until it changed its name in 2018. This month it was accused of “profiteering” from the energy crisis and higher household bills after posting record annual earnings of £62bn.

During the fourth quarter of 2022 it produced the equivalent of 2,046m barrels of oil a day. It has oil and gas assets in the North Sea, Brazil, Algeria, Angola, Nigeria and Tanzania.

Equinor and the Science Museum declined to reveal how much the oil company paid to sponsor the Wonderlab exhibition.

Environmental groups claim the Science Museum has lost its ability to honestly discuss the true impact of the oil and gas sector on the environment because of gagging clauses it has signed with big businesses.

In 2021, two prominent scientists refused to allow their work to be included in the Science Museum’s collection after it was revealed that the institution had signed a similar contract with Shell.

Steve and Dee Allen, global plastic pollution researchers, say the museum’s deals with fossil fuel companies such as Shell and Equinor mean it is no longer a credible scientific institution.

Commenting on the latest revelations, Steve Allen said: “Scientists cannot support these gagging clauses. It’s simply not tenable, because our job is to report how the world really is, to the best of our knowledge. We have to tell the whole truth, not just what is acceptable to the oil and gas industry.

“Even if the Science Museum completely cut its ties to the oil and gas industry today, I think the damage done to the institution’s credibility is going to take a very long time to repair.”

Robin Wells, a spokesperson for the campaign group Fossil Free London, said: “The idea that it is still acceptable for public institutions like the Science Museum to accept undisclosed amounts of money from big oil and gas companies like Equinor is very disappointing.

“The corrupting influence of oil and gas companies on public discourse about climate change has been repeatedly demonstrated over past decades.”

Dr Chris Garrard, a co-director of the campaign group Culture Unstained, said: “These clauses are deeply troubling, particularly when it comes to deals with unethical companies like fossil fuel companies, because it undermines the independence and integrity of public institutions.”

While museums routinely state that large corporate sponsors do not exert any editorial influence over exhibitions, in 2015 the Guardian revealed that Shell had tried to influence the presentation of a climate change programme it was sponsoring at the Science Museum.

Internal documents showed that the oil company raised concerns that part of the programme created “an opportunity for NGOs to talk about some of the issues that concern them around Shell’s operations”.

A spokesperson for the Science Museum said: “At all times the Science Museum retains editorial control of the content within our exhibitions and galleries, and this is asserted clearly and unambiguously in all contracts we sign.”

On the use of gagging clauses, the spokesperson said the museum had decided “to no longer include them in new agreements”.

Equinor said: “The clause you are referring to is a standard clause included by the museum in the contract – it is not something we have asked to be included.”

It said that although its name remained attached to the Wonderlab exhibition on signage and on the Science Museum website, the term of the sponsorship agreement ended in March 2022.

Equinor supplies about a quarter of Britain’s gas, and it hopes to develop the Rosebank field to the west of Shetland, despite opposition from climate protesters. A final investment decision on the UK’s largest undeveloped oilfield is expected this year.

• This article was amended on 24 February 2023 to reflect a comment from Equinor (giving its position on the origin of the clause) earlier in the text.

Contributor

Wil Crisp

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Science Museum should drop Statoil sponsorship of children’s gallery | Letters
Letters: The Wonderlab children’s gallery at the Science Museum in London has been sponsored by a company that wants to drill seven new wells in the fragile Arctic

Letters

10, Oct, 2016 @7:19 PM

Article image
Science Museum condemned for oil company sponsorship
Caroline Lucas and dozens of campaigners and scientists call on museum to drop Statoil backing of children’s gallery

Nicola Slawson

10, Oct, 2016 @7:26 PM

Article image
Science Museum ends sponsorship deal with Shell
Arrangement with oil company will not be renewed when it lapses in December, but museum refuses to rule out future partnership

Adam Vaughan

12, Nov, 2015 @1:44 PM

Article image
Dozens of academics shun Science Museum over fossil fuel ties
Pressure mounts over museum’s sponsorship deals as open letter expresses ‘deep concern’

Matthew Taylor

19, Nov, 2021 @3:22 PM

Article image
Manchester science festival partners withdraw over Shell sponsorship
Science and industry museum accused of hypocrisy for taking money from oil company

Helen Pidd North of England editor

02, Sep, 2018 @12:03 PM

Article image
Mark Rylance resigns from RSC over BP sponsorship
Actor says Royal Shakespeare Company deal helps oil firm ‘obscure reality of its activities’

Matthew Taylor

21, Jun, 2019 @3:30 PM

Article image
Science Museum ‘must lay down conditions’ to fossil fuel sponsors
UK’s former chief scientific adviser Sir David King adds to growing pressure on the London museum

Matthew Taylor

16, Dec, 2021 @1:28 PM

Article image
Extinction Rebellion activists glued to Science Museum site in Shell protest
Demonstrators attach themselves to railings in reaction to museum taking funding from oil firm for Our Future Planet show

Kevin Rawlinson and agency

29, Aug, 2021 @7:09 PM

Article image
Shell sponsorship and the Science Museum | Letters
Letters: Neither the Shell sponsorship nor David Hone’s membership of an advisory team compromised editorial decisions on the gallery vision or content

Letters

07, Jun, 2015 @4:31 PM

Article image
‘Absolute scandal’: UAE state oil firm able to read Cop28 climate summit emails
Exclusive: UN conference president Sultan Al Jaber is also head of oil firm, which was consulted on how to respond to a media inquiry

Damian Carrington Environment editor

07, Jun, 2023 @12:00 PM