The Guardian view on the NHS pay deal: divide and rule | Editorial

A contested settlement will do little to alleviate a chronic crisis which goes beyond issues of remuneration

The ongoing wave of public sector strikes, some of which could continue into the autumn, has been motivated by two main factors. One – the most immediate – is the spike in inflation and the cost of living crisis triggered by the war in Ukraine. For workforces which had already endured a steady erosion of pay and living standards for over a decade, this amounted to a blow upon the bruise inflicted by austerity.

The longer-term grievance relates to the more general underfunding and implicit undervaluing of public services, which successive Conservative governments have starved of necessary resources. For NHS employees especially, this has too often turned what should be the pursuit of a vocation into a quotidian exercise in putting out fires. The chronic recruitment and retention crises in our hospitals are the consequence of this dire combination of declining pay and increasingly beleaguered, morale-sapping working conditions.

Grudgingly, belatedly, the government has sought to partially address the first factor in the new pay deal agreed on Tuesday with the NHS Staff Council, which represents 12 health unions. This limited outbreak of consensus is progress of a kind. It might have been achieved much earlier had the health secretary, Stephen Barclay, agreed from the outset to negotiate on salaries. Instead, as Rishi Sunak talked tough about anti-strike legislation, Mr Barclay hid behind the miserly pay recommendation of the independent NHS pay review body, delivered before inflation hit. Months were wasted, with patients paying the price.

In an ebullient mood, Mr Barclay confirmed on Tuesday that he will swiftly implement the two-year deal. By doing so, he will hope to divide and rule, isolating Unite, which intends to carry on striking, and the Royal College of Nursing, whose members also rejected his offer and will be balloted on further action. In the short term, this approach may succeed. The numbers suggest that a second strike mandate for the RCN could be difficult to achieve. But the government should beware of over-celebrating an essentially hollow victory.

The tactical resolution of a pay dispute does not equate to a strategic solution for an institution in existential crisis. The nurses’ decision to reject Mr Barclay’s deal, taken against the advice of Pat Cullen, the RCN’s general secretary, testifies to a depth of alienation that goes far deeper than issues of remuneration. At the weekend, Matthew Taylor, the chief executive of the NHS Confederation, spoke of a “loss of hope” among overstretched staff. Too many feel unable to provide the care they know is necessary for their patients.

Announcing the pay deal, Mr Barclay pledged to work further with unions “to ensure that the NHS is the best place to work for staff, patients and taxpayers”. Warm words. But that kind of sustainable settlement – and a restoration of trust between the government and NHS employees – can only come about through a viable workforce plan to equip the health system to cope with a growing and ageing population. According to a leaked blueprint produced by NHS England, this would mean, among other things, doubling the number of doctors trained and increasing the number of nurses trained each year by close to 80%. Put another way, it would require a level of investment that might scupper Jeremy Hunt’s plans for tax cuts before the next election. NHS staff will not hold their breath.

Contributor

Editorial

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Guardian view on NHS strikes: a last resort and a cry of despair | Editorial
Editorial: Conservatives cannot deflect blame for a crisis that has been building for the 12 years they have been in government

Editorial

30, Nov, 2022 @6:44 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on doctors on strike: a symptom of a deeper crisis | Editorial
Editorial: The government has for too long exploited the goodwill of NHS staff to cover for inadequate resources

Editorial

12, Apr, 2023 @5:47 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the NHS in peril: the risks are multiplying | Editorial
Editorial: Rising pressures on staff could further weaken a depleted workforce. The government’s obduracy over pay is irresponsible

Editorial

29, Dec, 2022 @6:30 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the NHS at 75: pride mixed with disappointment | Editorial
Editorial: Underfunding and a lack of planning have undermined the health service, but the public is still behind it

Editorial

04, Jul, 2023 @6:09 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the NHS strikes: time to talk about pay, Mr Barclay | Editorial
Editorial: The government’s refusal to negotiate with unions is based on disingenuous arguments

Editorial

19, Dec, 2022 @7:04 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Sunak’s strikes: to be more inflexible than Thatcher is a flaw | Editorial
Editorial: The prime minister should be like his political idol and award inflation-proof pay rises to end industrial strife by key workers

Editorial

12, Dec, 2022 @7:02 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on strikes: Sunak needs a better plan | Editorial
Editorial: The prime minister lacks the authority and popularity for a long confrontation with public sector workers

Editorial

01, Feb, 2023 @6:44 PM

Article image
No money for nurses as billionaires’ wealth rises? | Letters
Letters: Readers write in support of industrial action over poor pay by public sector workers

23, Dec, 2022 @6:25 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Sunak and the strikes: misreading the mood of the nation | Editorial
Editorial: The prime minister is seeking confrontation with the unions in the belief he will reap a political reward

Editorial

07, Dec, 2022 @7:04 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on lionising Covid-19 workers: Johnson’s donkeys still fail them | Editorial
Editorial: Frontline staff deserve more than praise from the government. They need it to do its job

Editorial

27, Aug, 2020 @6:11 PM