I’m a teacher – and this is why I’m not giving my son a smartphone yet | Lola Okolosie

The adverse effects on children’s mental health are well known, and pre-teens are too young to safely navigate the internet

But everyone has one,” pleads my son as his father and I tell him, for the umpteenth time, that no, he will not get a smartphone. Not now and probably not for a few more years. Despite our firm resolve, it is hard not to feel sorry for him. As the end of year 6 draws closer, the weeks are peppered with stories of new classmates whose parents have, as one friend texted recently, “cracked”. WhatsApp groups are springing up so that friends going to different secondaries can easily keep in touch. It is a world of interaction he will remain ignorant of, but, much though it pains me to see the turmoil it causes, I feel vindicated each time I read about the detrimental impact that smartphones are having on children.

One report published earlier this year from the children’s commissioner, Dame Rachel de Souza, revealed that nearly a third of young people will have viewed pornography by the age of 11. Such content, De Souza clarifies, will not be the equivalent of “top-shelf” material some parents may have viewed in their youth and which today would be considered quaint. It is material in which “depictions of degradation, sexual coercion, aggression and exploitation are commonplace, and disproportionately targeted against teenage girls”.

Or there is the research conducted last year by Ofcom showing that bullying is more likely to happen on a device rather than face to face. School bullies are not new, but their ability to reach into the sanctuary of the home is a recent development. The problems that arise from pupils’ interactions on social media are taking up large portions of teachers’ time. In February, headteacher Jon Boyes of Herne Bay high school told parents that they would have to sort out arguments between pupils that have taken place online. It was “impossible for the school to police” and the principal cause of “disagreements, stress, anxiety and trauma” among pupils, he wrote. The head urged parents to try to limit screen time, and reminded them that “most social media platforms have a minimum age of 13 years old … meaning most students in years 7 and 8 should not even be using social media”.

Although buying your child a smartphone may seem like the best way to keep them safe, or to ensure they don’t end up feeling socially isolated, evidence suggests that the technology is having dangerous effects on children’s mental health. The most recent survey published by the OECD’s programme for international student assessment (Pisa), of 15- and 16-year-olds in 37 countries around the world, showed that in all but one of those countries, nearly twice as many adolescents had “elevated levels of loneliness” with “school loneliness” proving high when smartphone access and internet use were also high. These findings were echoed in a recent global study of nearly 30,000 young adults, which found a link between the age a child received their first smartphone and their mental health in young adulthood.

Children who were given a phone later went on to experience better mental wellbeing in relation to their self-confidence and their ability to relate to others, researchers found. Conversely, those who received a phone at a younger age were more likely to experience suicidal thoughts, feelings of aggression towards others and the sense that they were detached from reality. These trends proved stronger in females than males but were consistent across all 41 countries surveyed in the report. Children with smartphones spend, on average, more than three hours a day online, away from family time and in-person interactions. Social media compels them to “compare and despair”, and puts them in touch with toxic influencers such as Andrew Tate.

You might be inclined to dismiss all this as a pointless exercise in closing the stable door after the horse has bolted. Yet given what we know, I don’t think defeat is an option. Parents should be willing to entertain the notion that it’s possible to reject following the herd, at least until their children are old enough to navigate what they find on the internet. In fact, both TikTok and Snapchat require users to be 13 years old. There is power in pushing back against the idea that a smartphone is the only way to keep a child safe, or of ensuring they have access to important friendships. We can, like the 45,000 Texans who are part of the Wait Until 8th movement, which empowers parents to delay giving a smartphone to their children until 8th grade (year 9), hold the line until they become teenagers.

My son is only 10. He’s nowhere near ready to wade through the confusing and harmful detritus that he will no doubt find on the internet. He hasn’t developed the emotional maturity to deftly avoid the litter along his route. As his parent, why would I assume he could navigate terrain many adults struggle to get a handle on? Since I can’t, I’ll make do with betting that he can survive with a good old-fashioned “dumbphone”, at least until he’s older.

  • Lola Okolosie is an English teacher and writer focusing on race, politics, education and feminism

Contributor

Lola Okolosie

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
What’s wrong with young people today? They don’t get drunk any more | Richard Godwin
There are lots of theories to explain falling alcohol use among millennials. But maybe we’re missing the point, says Richard Godwin, author of The Spirits

Richard Godwin

11, Oct, 2018 @8:00 AM

Article image
Is our smartphone addiction damaging our children? | Rowan Davies
Research has found a link between ‘technoference’ and poor child behaviour. The need for light relief is very human, but perhaps we can find a happier balance

Rowan Davies

31, May, 2017 @4:42 AM

Article image
A distraction? Far from it – your smartphone is your best friend | Phoebe-Jane Boyd
Have those psychologists who criticise mobile phone use ever had to IMDB the plot of Tango & Cash to save a friendship, asks the freelance journalist Phoebe-Jane Boyd

Phoebe-Jane Boyd

01, Mar, 2018 @1:14 PM

Article image
My young son was 'approached' online. Does that make me a bad parent? | Zoe Williams
New UK legislation is badly needed to control the wild west of the digital world – and unfortunately I know this all too well, writes Guardian columnist Zoe Williams

Zoe Williams

09, Apr, 2019 @5:00 AM

Article image
I’d like to ban screens. But sometimes domestic harmony depends on Peppa Pig | Emma Brockes
WHO guidelines warn of the dangers of screen time. However in my house, it has its benefits too, says Guardian columnist Emma Brockes

Emma Brockes

26, Apr, 2019 @1:34 PM

Article image
JoJo Siwa has taken over our home, but I am staging a fightback | Emma Brockes
I have a cunning plan to overcome my five-year-olds’ obsesssion with the big-bowed YouTuber, says Guardian columnist Emma Brockes

Emma Brockes

15, Feb, 2020 @10:00 AM

Article image
My children have made me an online laughing stock | Joanna Moorhead
They lie in wait, unforgiving mobiles poised to film my every foible. Such is the fate of parents in the digital age, says Guardian features writer Joanna Moorhead

Joanna Moorhead

31, May, 2018 @9:30 AM

Article image
I regularly shared photos of my son on social media. Then alarm bells started ringing | Hannah Nwoko
Like millions of doting parents, I wanted to keep others abreast of my child’s milestones. But the ‘likes’ weren’t worth the risks, says freelance journalist Hannah Nwoko

Hannah Nwoko

26, Feb, 2024 @8:00 AM

Article image
Is this the summer I’ll learn to fight the capitalist urge to ‘do’ something? | Emma Brockes
The maddening impulse to be productive on holiday has given way to having fun – and I’m enjoying every minute, says Guardian columnist Emma Brockes

Emma Brockes

04, Aug, 2022 @12:00 PM

Article image
Spare me the fuss about children born ‘out of wedlock’ – this is the 21st century | Rhiannon Lucy Cosslett
Marriage is much less of a priority than it used to be, and giving a child a loving upbringing requires more than a ring and a vicar, says Guardian columnist Rhiannon Lucy Cosslett

Rhiannon Lucy Cosslett

10, Aug, 2022 @3:00 PM