Terrified of leavers and remainers, Labour offers a Brexit sticking plaster – and that won’t do | Neal Lawson

David Lammy promises to reconnect the EU to ‘tarnished’ Britain, but when will we fix the democratic flaws that led to the vote?

Pity Labour right now: feeling the righteous heat of Brexit failure, needing to appease ever more vociferous remainers, but desperate not to alarm “red wall” voters.

So we are offered vague words from Labour’s David Lammy, the shadow foreign secretary, of better connections between the EU and “tarnished” Britain and aspirations about joint talking shops, when the reality is that faced with a continually chaotic UK, the EU will simply protect its members and enjoy the schadenfreude.

What we are being offered now is another sticking plaster for the deepest running sore of British politics. As we mark 50 years since we joined the then EEC and three years since we left, isn’t it high time we took stock of what has become of Britain’s sorry relationship with the EU and of us, the British citizens?

Let’s start with some home truths. Europe was only ever a partially democratic project. It was deeply contradictory in nature. Ted Heath took us in without a vote; we only voted to stay in after this fait accompli. The public was offered its first slice of battenberg cakeism – everything was to be gained from this club and nothing lost. Instinctively, though, people knew that powers and decisions were being handed over. And for more than 40 years they had no say on it.

In the same year as the 1975 referendum, an influential report by the Trilateral Commission claimed the growing social and economic problems of the US, Japan and Europe stemmed from an “excess of democracy”. Politicians were too amenable to the whims of voters and would spend too much, causing inflation. The people could not be trusted – but central bankers could. Thus the democratic deficit was deepened.

As a consequence, as Helen Thompson suggests in her majestic book Disorder, “Brexit was, in the long term, most likely unavoidable”. There was bound to be a clash between the interests of technocrats and democrats. Being in Europe, by definition, meant the loss of some control. But that conversation was too difficult, and the people, after all, could not be trusted. The seeds of Faragism were being sown.

The deceit, once created, had to be maintained. With every new treaty that ceded more power to the EU – sometimes for good social or environmental ends, often to embedded neoliberalism – Thatcher, Major, Blair, Brown and then Cameron all promised referendums, but would wriggle free from the commitment.

And all this time the nation polarised. Deindustrialisation, the political project of Thatcherism to hollow out the unions and any semblance of effective class solidarity, bred bitterness and resentment. New Labour, because it never sufficiently levelled up, eventually rolled the pitch for Nigel Farage.

By supporting the extension of the EU to 27 nations and not adopting the transitional immigration rules other countries took up, Labour handed the initiative to the Brexiters. In New Labour’s cynicism, it saw a quick productivity fix that boosted tax revenues through easily imported eastern European labour.

Boris Johnson
‘Eventually, of course, the country tired of it all and backed the strong man who could ‘get Brexit done’.’ Boris Johnson in 2019. Photograph: Frank Augstein/AFP/Getty Images

It never reckoned with the backwash from the already precarious people for whom all this was too much too quickly, economically, socially and culturally – especially when there was no enforcement of the minimum wage, so little social housing and so much pressure on the NHS and school places. Labour refused to make the case for immigration and just hoped “growth” would cover the tensions. And poisonously, it based New Labour on its humiliation of old Labour, also known as the red wall.

The referendum cemented the divide. An adversarial two-party system that ignored huge chunks of voters eventually destabilised the country and both parties, just as it had in Scotland, two years before. But the party tribalists couldn’t learn. Instead of forging a deal that looked like the 51% to 49% result, they pursued their own factional interests. Eventually, of course, the country tired of it all and backed the strong man who could “get Brexit done”. We live in its hard wake. Inevitably, like everything in our post-democracy, it unravelled.

The tragedy, of course, is that we need to belong to institutions that go beyond nations as the only hope of dealing with climate chaos, globalised finance, multinational corporations, mass immigration and turbulent geopolitics. But that need must be balanced with nation and place. There is no socialism in one country, no globalised cosmopolitan nirvana and no Davos on Thames. Instead, there must be a way of managing the challenges, tensions and paradoxes we face.

It is our political system that forces bad binary choices on us. Today, Labour, the party that ignored leavers now ignores remainers. The Tories, eternally trying to spring the Faragist trap, see his Reform UK vote climb again. Devoid of Boris Johnson, the only politician who can withstand Farage’s populist touch, the pressure to bend to the politics of hard Brexit remains irresistible. The polls are encouraging now, but something like the 2019 Tory upsurge could happen again, as the right consolidates around an anti-Europe, anti-immigration agenda, retaining some of the red wall. Whether it’s enough to deny Labour a majority remains to be seen. But the most dynamic force in UK politics continues to be rightwing populism.

Farage tweeted recently that “Britain is broke”. He should know. Brexit tipped us over the edge, but for Brexit to have happened, the country must have been broken. The biggest beneficiaries of such desolation could be him and his populist, scapegoating anti-politics. Only a new negotiated politics allows a serious and deep conversation about what sort of country we want to be and how we govern ourselves.

It is more than six years since the Brexit vote, but everything and nothing has changed: we have same electoral system, the same cartel parties, the same adversarial and short-term, zero-sum politics. It’s “blue walls” v red walls, as if the country, its people and its future really were that binary.

Brexit was a project instigated by people who wanted to take our country in the wrong direction, and the fact that they won still hasn’t given us anywhere near enough pause for thought about why, and whether we are anywhere near a politics that could make people feel connected, and repel the populists.

Labour means well, but it’s offering sticking plasters – and sticking plasters will not do.

  • Neal Lawson is director of the cross-party campaign organisation Compass


Neal Lawson

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
It’s Tory remainers – not Labour leavers – who are the real key to this election | Paula Surridge
A third of 2017 Conservative voters also voted remain. Will fear of Jeremy Corbyn keep them away from the Lib Dems? asks academic Paula Surridge

Paula Surridge

15, Nov, 2019 @4:03 PM

Article image
Labour lost its leavers while Tory remainers stayed loyal | Paula Surridge
The Tory victory relied on voters who identified strongly with leave – while retaining those with softer attachments to remain, says Paula Surridge, an academic

Paula Surridge

13, Dec, 2019 @6:12 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Labour and Brexit: lead the debate | Editorial
Editorial: The Tory leadership contest is closing down space for compromise. The opposition must make the case for Britain’s European alliance


26, Jun, 2019 @5:48 PM

Article image
An election is on the cards. So what do the polls tell us? | Gideon Skinner
We know what the parties’ strengths and weaknesses are, but predicting what that means in terms of seats is difficult, says pollster Gideon Skinner

Gideon Skinner

04, Sep, 2019 @1:39 PM

Article image
How ultra-remainers could score a spectacular own goal on Brexit | Owen Jones
Nigel Farage’s Brexit party will reap the rewards if those demanding a second referendum at any cost punish Labour, says Guardian columnist Owen Jones

Owen Jones

01, May, 2019 @3:30 PM

Article image
The truth about Labour leavers: they feel locked out of politics | Aditya Chakrabortty
They could decide the future course of the country, but they’re not the stereotypes we’ve been sold, says Guardian columnist Aditya Chakrabortty

Aditya Chakrabortty

12, Dec, 2019 @6:00 AM

Article image
The Guardian view on May’s elections: resolve Brexit, defend democracy | Editorial
Editorial: Mainstream politicians will only find a way out of current mess by reconnecting with the public. They are failing to do so


30, Apr, 2019 @6:14 PM

Article image
Tories in for a Brexit party trouncing, while Remainers abandon Labour
Polling shows Nigel Farage’s party would defeat Tories in a general election, while Lib Dems become top choice for Remain voters

Michael Savage

18, May, 2019 @7:02 PM

Article image
Now it’s a fight to the finish between a no-deal Brexit and remain | Jonathan Freedland
May’s departure and the rise of the Brexit party may have killed off a compromise, says Guardian columnist Jonathan Freedland

Jonathan Freedland

24, May, 2019 @4:53 PM

Article image
Brexit stems from a civil war in capitalism – we are all just collateral damage | George Monbiot
To one sort of capitalist, the insecurity and chaos that Brexit will bring is horrifying. To the other, it is highly profitable

George Monbiot

24, Nov, 2020 @4:42 PM