Blocking Scotland’s gender bill is no anti-woke crusade. But it’s not a democratic outrage either | Martin Kettle

Some may suspect Rishi Sunak of trying to start a culture war, but there is a real legislative problem here

Many will see Rishi Sunak’s decision to stop Scotland’s new gender recognition bill from becoming law as both bigoted and brutal. Bigoted because it halts a bill that makes it easier for a person to change gender. Brutal because it blocks a bill that has been agreed by Scotland’s devolved parliament.

Let’s be clear that there is some truth to this view. Some Conservatives would love a crusading unionist confrontation with Nicola Sturgeon’s nationalist government. They would especially welcome weaponising an issue such as the gender recognition bill, where public support for change is cool, and on which the Labour party is divided.

But the truth is also more dappled. The Scottish nationalists are crusaders too. Sturgeon has weaponised gender recognition as part of her showcasing of Scottish progressivism, causing unusual strains in the SNP along the way. She also needs a fight with the UK to distract attention from the current rethink on her independence referendum strategy. This is not the first time she has pushed the boundaries of the devolution settlement. She has done it on children’s rights and on a second independence referendum, too. It’s what she does.

Nevertheless, this is the first time any UK government has responded by using the legislative veto. That makes it a milestone moment. This inescapably lends plausibility to the interpretation that Sunak is embarked on a pre-general election culture war mobilisation.

Even here, though, there are other factors to consider. In the first place, while it is true that some on the English Tory right seem only too happy to pick fights with Sturgeon and the Scottish National party, this does not in fact appear to be Sunak’s own preference.

After Boris Johnson’s “muscular unionism”, and following Liz Truss’s attempt to blank Sturgeon altogether, Sunak’s approach to Scotland has been markedly less confrontational. He was quick to talk with Sturgeon when he first became prime minister. Last week, he met her for what was apparently a useful dinner in Inverness during a visit there.

Sunak’s approach has been mostly respectful, not the opposite. As in Northern Ireland, he has dialled down the rhetoric and emphasised the pragmatic. He has taken every opportunity to appear reasonable, and to offer cooperation not conflict. He also knows the Tory party’s electoral chances depend on competent economic management more than on constitutional stunts.

Alister Jack’s intervention on Monday is indeed the first time that any Scottish secretary has used his section 35 powers under the 1998 Scotland Act. But that’s not the same as saying that for 25 years, the Scottish and UK governments have always seen eye to eye about legislation until today. They haven’t. When issues have arisen, though, they were often resolved politically, at the intergovernmental level – notably over the first independence referendum in 2014.

Go back to the devolution debates in May 1998 and you find Donald Dewar, architect of devolution, spelling out the inherent problem: “We have a situation in which there is a division of responsibility as between reserved and devolved powers. If one takes a simplistic view, one might say that the writ of the Scottish parliament runs in devolved areas and that there will be reserved areas with which the Scottish parliament cannot meddle and where its writ does not run … However, the world of politics and of legislation is not as neatly divided as that – there are no exact demarcations or neat barriers that cannot be crossed – so legislation in a devolved area of responsibility will often have implications for reserved areas and reserved functions.”

As Dewar rightly said a quarter of a century ago, the worlds of politics and law are not neatly demarcated. The gender recognition bill has uncertain implications for the UK Equality Act 2010. Along with a December ruling by Scotland’s highest court, it appears to redefine and reshape some of the equal opportunities rights in the 2010 law, which applies across the whole UK. The terms of the two statutes therefore need to be reconciled.

This isn’t really a democratic outrage. It’s not primarily an anti-woke crusade either. It is an example of a standard balancing problem in federal or quasi-federal states such as ours. And the need to reconcile is what Jack invoked. His statement added that he would like to see a political solution, in an amended bill, which he said he was willing to negotiate. If Jack was telling the truth, and if the SNP was up for a compromise, it could happen. In a less polarised polity, it probably would. But it’s not a likely outcome here.

The issue is therefore likely to end eventually at the supreme court. That isn’t an ideal way of governing at what the House of Commons library publication on section 35 powers calls “the complex intersection between devolved and reserved matters”. But it is the right one. The failure of UK politics and governance, Scotland’s included, over this bill requires the court to do what the politicians should be doing. We are still paying the price for the pantomime politics of the Brexit era.

  • Martin Kettle is a Guardian columnist

  • Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.


Martin Kettle

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Guardian view on Scotland’s gender reform bill: understand more, condemn less | Editorial
Editorial: Scottish legislation redeems the promises made by a previous Tory prime minister, yet both sides are now in a constitutional showdown


18, Jan, 2023 @6:30 PM

Article image
Westminster block on Scotland’s gender recognition bill may be gift to the SNP
While young transgender Scots express anger and frustration at intervention, critics doubt the looming legal battle will bring any more clarity

Libby Brooks Scotland correspondent

17, Jan, 2023 @7:18 PM

Article image
The gender politics of Sturgeon v Salmond can't be ignored | Joan Smith
There’s something disturbing about a powerful man raging against his female former protege, says Joan Smith, chair of the Mayor of London’s Violence Against Women and Girls Board

Joan Smith

04, Mar, 2021 @2:07 PM

Article image
Martin Rowson on UK ministers blocking Scotland’s gender recognition law – cartoon
Nicola Sturgeon and Rishi Sunak have come to blows over what the SNP called an ‘attack on the Scottish parliament’

Martin Rowson

17, Jan, 2023 @8:01 PM

Article image
My England is in a mess. Scotland’s case for splitting away is stronger than ever | John Harris
The country I call home is dysfunctional. But north of the border, there’s the chance of something better, says Guardian columnist John Harris

John Harris

28, Apr, 2019 @3:53 PM

Article image
We don’t know if jury-less trials will convict more rapists, but don’t shut down the debate | Nicola Sturgeon
Since stepping down, I have been struck by the polarisation in politics. This vital discussion must not become part of that, says Nicola Sturgeon, former first minister of Scotland

Nicola Sturgeon

15, May, 2023 @11:00 AM

Article image
Scotland had to reject the EU withdrawal bill. It was a power grab | Ruth Wishart
Holyrood’s vote was not another independence bid, but a move to ensure Brexit does not undermine Scotland’s existing devolved powers, says Scottish columnist and broadcaster Ruth Wishart

Ruth Wishart

16, May, 2018 @11:47 AM

Article image
Back the Gender Recognition Act reform. It’s the feminist thing to do | Ellie Mae O’Hagan
On this final day of consultation I urge feminists to support this progressive step, says freelance writer Ellie Mae O’Hagan

Ellie Mae O'Hagan

19, Oct, 2018 @2:54 PM

Article image
The SNP is the most vulnerable it’s been in a long time. But only a fool would write it off | Martin Kettle
While Humza Yousaf faces an uphill battle reviving his party, Britain continues to slowly come apart at the seams, says Guardian columnist Martin Kettle

Martin Kettle

31, Mar, 2023 @3:00 PM

Article image
Rishi Sunak ‘concerned’ about impact of Scotland’s gender recognition bill
PM dodges questions about whether he would stop controversial bill receiving royal assent

Aubrey Allegretti

13, Jan, 2023 @5:06 PM