The Guardian view on Granta’s Best of Young British Novelists: why we love a list | Editorial

Yes, they are marketing tools – but cataloguing culture says much about the society we live in

Like it or not, pretty much everyone today lives in a world of lists. If the lists are not made for us, we compile them ourselves: places to go, things to do and to see. The Italian novelist Umberto Eco found this so interesting as to write a book about it (he also mischievously nominated the telephone directory as the book he would like to be cast away with, on Radio 4’s Desert Island Discs.)

Mischief and triviality have always been part of the cultural role of lists, but they are also serious and revealing in all sorts of ways. “[N]othing seems simpler than making a list, but in fact it’s much more complicated than it seems: you always leave something out, you’re tempted to write etc, but the whole point of an inventory is not to write etc,” opined the Oulipian thinker Georges Perec, in a 1976 essay.

It is the wilful omission of that “etc” that makes such a minefield of so many lists, particularly when it comes to the prizes that now shower down from all directions throughout the year. In the literary world alone, the last fortnight has seen shortlists for the International Booker and the Jhalak prize for writers of colour in the UK, the Highland book prize in Scotland, and the Griffin poetry prize in Canada.

Each signals a territory and sets out what they are looking for. There may only be one winner, but it is the list of five or six finalists that defines the field and trumpets the values – longlists, for all their worthiness, falling prey to Perec’s outlawed etc. Cynics rightly argue that these are basically promotional and campaigning tools in a marketised culture, which are intended to increase the visibility – and therefore sales – of particular sectors within a fiercely competitive industry. But that is only part of the story.

One of the most contentious literary lists, also just announced, is Granta’s 20-strong Best of Young British Novelists. Launched by the literary magazine in 1983 to establish a benchmark for the finest young voices in fiction, it is greeted each decade with a clamour of dissent. Mainly, this is about those who have been left out: this year’s crop has none of the familiarity of the debut list, which included Ian McEwan, Salman Rushdie and Rose Tremain. The occasional complaint from those who have found themselves on the inside, such as 2013’s Sarah Hall, draws attention to the bloodsport of listings. Comparison, on the sort of platforms a nomination opens up, can be excruciating for a writer.

It takes decades to get a perspective on any one lineup of writers or artists, but decades are what the Granta list is usefully accruing, like the growth rings on a tree. This time there are far more women, but far fewer black writers, than in any previous generation. Above all, it shows a culture in ferment, stripped of its monolithic certainties, trying to decentre itself in ways that can look random (New Zealander Eleanor Catton is eligible because she now lives in the UK; Sally Rooney, hailed as the first great millennial writer, is not, though Irish writers can be nominated for many British-based literary prizes). In short, it’s a bit all over the place, which seems a pretty good measure of these times.



The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Granta’s list of the best young American novelists
Once a decade, Granta picks the most-promising authors under 40 in the US and UK. Here are the 21 young American writers to watch this decade

26, Apr, 2017 @3:18 PM

Article image
Granta’s Best of Young British Novelists – meet the class of 23
From Kazuo Ishiguro to Zadie Smith, Granta’s list has been spotlighting future stars since 1983. Four decades on, what does its evolution says about our literary landscape?

Lisa Allardice

15, Apr, 2023 @8:00 AM

Article image
Why so much hype? Being on Granta’s best young novelists list has its drawbacks | Sarah Hall
In 2013, I was one of the chosen 20. Today, I still question the accolades and gimmickry around making the grade

Sarah Hall

16, Apr, 2023 @10:00 AM

Article image
The age of anxiety: what does Granta’s best young authors list say about America?
The US is in crisis - what about its literature? Michelle Dean reports on the 2017 Granta list of writers under 40, which is as diverse as the country itself

Michelle Dean

26, Apr, 2017 @3:50 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Oslo’s Future Library: hope in practice | Editorial
Editorial: Trees, vision and shelf space are all needed for an exemplary project that will hide books for a century


21, Jun, 2022 @5:22 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on arts prizes: a 20th-century phenomenon? | Editorial
Editorial: This year’s Booker and Turner prizes tell us artists and even judges are repudiating the winner-takes-all award. It may be time to find new ways to celebrate the arts


15, Dec, 2019 @6:25 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on declining authors’ pay: an unequal burden | Editorial
Editorial: A steep slump in average earnings not only affects individuals, but impoverishes literature by dictating which stories get told


11, Dec, 2022 @6:25 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Annie Ernaux: a vintage Nobel winner | Editorial
Editorial: One of France’s finest writers has joined an all too select bunch of female laureates. And about time too


07, Oct, 2022 @5:25 PM

Article image
Best of Young British Novelists 4, edited by John Freeman – review
There is capable writing but few surprises in Granta's highly globalised anthology, says Theo Tait

Theo Tait

16, Apr, 2013 @2:14 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on business and arts: cash without a voice | Editorial
Editorial: Corporate sponsorship needs to steer clear of impinging on artistic freedoms


01, Feb, 2019 @6:25 PM