Putin's wild claims of a dirty bomb show just how badly his army is faring | Hamish de Bretton-Gordon

With his conventional warfare campaign failing, the Russian leader is reaching for ever more desperate tactics

Putin’s conventional army is being defeated by a much smaller force, albeit one backed by the west’s latest technology and intelligence. His ridiculous claim that Ukraine is planning to use a “dirty bomb” – an explosive device containing radioactive material – implies he is now groping towards more unconventional methods of warfare.

This is unsurprising when we see how poorly the Russian army is performing, which presumably Putin is also seeing. Putin’s response has been to appoint General “Armageddon” Surovikin as his overall commander in Ukraine, and the dirty bomb allegation is right out of Surovkin’s playbook.

The “dirty” bomb concept is a complete chimera – a fantasy designed to terrify people in Ukraine and allow Russia to escalate its unconventional warfare. The claim has been dismissed by France, Britain and the US, and the UN is sending inspectors at Ukraine’s request to two nuclear sites to prove it is baseless . There has never been a successful dirty bomb attack. But their psychological impact is 10 times greater than their physical effect, and Putin must be hoping this will break the will of the Ukrainians.

Putin’s style of unconventional warfare relies upon making the civilian population the target rather than the opposing military. And cynically this makes sense, as his own soldiers have been found wanting against the Ukrainian army. The focus is now on attacking civilians as the soldiers fight on the frontlines: killing them on their way to work, or children on their way to school. For those injured in these attacks, the Russians then attack hospitals to prevent treatment: 500 so far in this war, according to the World Health Organisation.

Russia tested and developed its unconventional warfare concept in Syria. This included the use of chemical weapons, which the Assad regime turned to whenever defeat seemed imminent. The rebels were about to storm Damascus in August 2013 when Assad dropped the deadly nerve agent sarin on the suburb of Ghouta, killing more than 1,000 people and stopping the advance in its tracks. He also broke the six-year conventional siege of Douma with chlorine barrel bombs in 2018. Weapons like chlorine and dirty bombs are morbidly effective owing to the terror they impart, and must be fully outlawed by the United Nations and the free world.

Though I believe that global nuclear warfare is very unlikely, anything less is possible, especially if Putin’s vital territory of Crimea is threatened, which is looking increasingly likely. In unconventional warfare there is very much a “dirty” nuclear threat, which could be almost as devastating as a battlefield nuclear weapon, by turning nuclear power stations into improvised nuclear weapons – in essence a massive “dirty” bomb.

In theory the Geneva Conventions and the rules of war outlaw unconventional warfare – but Putin and his generals seem more than willing to ignore both. The new prime minister must, with Nato allies, ensure that Putin is never able to reach for his most devastating unconventional weapons.

  • Hamish de Bretton-Gordon is a former commander in UK and Nato CBRN forces, a chemical and nuclear weapons expert and an adviser to the Union of Syrian Medical Charities


Hamish de Bretton-Gordon

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Why are chemical weapons worse than other weapons of mass destruction? | William Schabas
The outrage of nuclear-armed countries at their use in Syria has the whiff of hypocrisy, says professor of international law William Schabas

William Schabas

25, Apr, 2018 @2:21 PM

Article image
The west stood back and watched in Syria – it must not do the same in Ukraine | Hamish de Bretton-Gordon
It’s time for the US and its allies to show their steel in the face of Putin’s aggression, says chemical weapons expert Hamish de Bretton-Gordon

Hamish de Bretton-Gordon

24, Feb, 2022 @6:00 AM

Article image
To Vladimir Putin’s mind, chemical weapons might just seem a good idea | Paul Rogers
Knowing that he cannot afford to fail, the Russian leader may be willing to use the most grotesque means to break Ukrainian resistance, says academic Paul Rogers

Paul Rogers

12, Mar, 2022 @10:00 AM

Article image
Putin’s regime may fall – but what comes next? | Anatol Lieven
There is an opportunity to negotiate a way back from the brink, says Anatol Lieven of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft

Anatol Lieven

27, Sep, 2022 @11:05 AM

Article image
UN nuclear inspectors shut down Russian ‘dirty bomb’ claim against Ukraine
Volodymyr Zelenskiy says findings are ‘clear and irrefutable’ after IAEA finds no evidence of undeclared nuclear activities and materials

Guardian staff and agencies

04, Nov, 2022 @3:04 AM

Article image
Russia steps up Ukraine ‘dirty bomb’ claim in letter delivered to UN
Kyiv’s allies dismiss allegation it could use such a weapon on its own soil as scientifically absurd and a distraction effort

Julian Borger in Washington and Peter Beaumont

25, Oct, 2022 @9:35 PM

Article image
The Observer view on how to make 2018 a turning point | Observer editorial
In exaggerating pessimism we neglect ways to create a better world

Observer editorial

31, Dec, 2017 @12:02 AM

Article image
How long can the UN endure the shame of chemical attacks on Syrian citizens? | Jean-Marc Ayrault and Boris Johnson
We fully support the Khan Sheikhun inquiry – but the UN has a moral duty to uphold the prohibition of such weapons and ensure they aren’t used again

Jean-Marc Ayrault and Boris Johnson

14, Apr, 2017 @9:00 PM

Article image
I believe in the UN, but it needs to examine its conscience over Syria | Martti Ahtisaari
The security council has focused on political point-scoring rather than on ending the worst humanitarian crisis of our time, says the former president of Finland Martti Ahtisaari

Martti Ahtisaari

20, Apr, 2018 @10:30 AM

Article image
Thursday briefing: How to make sense of Putin’s nuclear threats
Putin has mobilised reservists and is threatening to use nuclear weapons, but is he serious – and what is really at stake?

Archie Bland

22, Sep, 2022 @5:36 AM