Reality check: the Northern Ireland protocol isn't the problem, Brexit is | Rafael Behr

The Tories are addicted to conflict with the EU, for fear of taking responsibility for the consequences of liberation

The Conservative party was happy with Brexit, but not for long. A deal that was great in 2019 is now not great. What could fix it? What change would bring enduring satisfaction? The answer is obvious to anyone familiar with the patterns of English Euroscepticism – nothing. There is no concession big enough, no deal good enough, just as no single fix can end the cravings of a drug addict. The long-term solution is to get sober.

That is not on Liz Truss’s agenda. On Tuesday, the foreign secretary informed parliament of a government plan to assert its own version of the Northern Ireland protocol. That is a threat designed to prod the EU into renegotiating the 2019 withdrawal agreement, which was itself the outcome of a renegotiation made necessary because Theresa May had done a deal that Conservative MPs also didn’t like.

One reason continental leaders don’t want to talk about changes amounting to a new treaty is their certain knowledge that the Tories would be dissatisfied again soon enough. Another reason is that a revised deal would involve trusting Boris Johnson, which EU governments have done before and which no one does twice.

Truss’s account of the problem in Northern Ireland elides frustration with border checks across the Irish sea and a wider complaint about the residue of EU jurisdiction in Northern Ireland that Brexit hardliners see as a stain on UK sovereignty. She is egged on by Tory backbenchers who are convinced that the protocol was foisted on Britain; that it amounts to a regulatory land-grab and that its provisions are applied with pernickety spite as punishment by Brussels of an ex-colony that had the temerity to break free.

Believing that version of events requires two psychological traits that come easily to the fervent Eurosceptic. One is a capacity to forget that every problem currently associated with Brexit, including the specific danger in Northern Ireland, was signalled by remainers and dismissed with contempt as scaremongering by leavers. The other is a need to still feel victimised by Brussels even after leaving the EU, since ending that ordeal removes any excuse for Brexit not delivering its promised bounties.

That is the addiction – the sadomasochistic compulsion to be oppressed by foreigners for fear of taking responsibility for the consequences of liberation.

It is true that customs checks in the Irish Sea are a symbolic injury to unionist feeling in Northern Ireland. But it is also true that Johnson knowingly inflicted that injury, denied he had done it, then whipped the grievance up when he should have been hosing it down. A constitutional crisis at Stormont was not prefigured in the letter of the protocol, but it was made likely by the prime minister’s irresponsible and negligent handling of the politics of the protocol from the day he signed it.

Meanwhile, if Tory backbenchers had not found all the resentment they needed in Northern Ireland, they would have gone hunting for reasons to be dissatisfied with Brexit in England instead.

One of Johnson’s complaints about an Irish Sea border, as expressed in an interview earlier this week, was that regulatory checks create “extra barriers to trade and burdens on business.” That generates “a great deal of faff and botheration”, which increases living costs. Those barriers are uniquely upsetting to Northern Ireland unionists on the level of national identity, but the faff and botheration incur costs also at Dover, Grimsby, Felixstowe; any place where goods move between Britain and the EU.

In other words, the prime minister’s economic rationale for wanting to fix the Northern Ireland protocol contains a complaint about conditions that are intrinsic to the Brexit model he chose.

That is yet another reason why no one in Brussels wants to reopen the 2019 deal. The negotiation would founder on first principles. Brussels says that if Britain is no longer automatically applying EU rules, it must prove that its exports comply. The Brexit ultras think that Brussels is only imposing that requirement out of petty vindictiveness and that the very Britishness of British standards should be sufficient guarantee of quality. That has been the impasse in every chilly phone call and deadlocked meeting between the two sides since 2016.

The Tories cannot budge on that point because doing so would involve accepting two indisputable facts about Brexit. First, exiting the single market was bad for UK businesses (and the losses are not made up by free-trade deals with other countries). Second, Britain had the levers to steer EU policy as a member state and surrendered that power when it left.

No minister serving in the current cabinet can admit those truths. Until that changes, UK policy towards the EU will amount to little more than rattling the cage of delusion that Brexit imposes on its believers. Some Eurosceptics find perverse pleasure in captivity, but that is their fetish and not something anyone else needs to indulge.

When policies fail on such a Titanic scale, it is usual to have some debate about a change of direction. That isn’t happening, because the opposition has no alternative destination in mind, or none that it advertises in public.

Keir Starmer is mindful that his support for a second referendum back in the day is still a vulnerability in constituencies where the Tories want to drive Brexit ever deeper as a wedge between Labour and its estranged core voters. One function of Truss’s bill overriding the Northern Ireland protocol is that anyone opposing it can be cast as an unrepentant remainer.

Labour’s absence from the conversation is not only metaphorical. Two opposition seats on the European scrutiny committee, which notionally holds the government to account on EU matters, are effectively vacant because the Labour MPs who sat there have moved on to frontbench jobs, and haven’t been replaced.

Labour strategists take the view that sanity in EU policy only becomes available by winning an election fought on other issues – things voters actually care about – and not by dancing to a drum that Johnson beats to distract from all his other failures. That is probably true. But it means the parameters of Brexit debate are set by marginal differences between maniacs and hardliners over the optimal pace for fleeing reality.

It is a formula for perpetual crisis. The constitutional mess that Johnson has made of Northern Ireland is so far the gravest episode, but unlikely to be the last. The problem isn’t that the protocol cannot be made to work as written, but that it was written to enact a Brexit that doesn’t work.

  • Rafael Behr is a Guardian columnist

Contributor

Rafael Behr

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Britain’s attack on its own protocol is one more exercise in Brexit gaslighting | Fintan O'Toole
Ministers are portraying themselves as victims of a deal they created, says Irish Times columnist Fintan O’Toole

Fintan O’Toole

15, Jun, 2022 @5:00 AM

Article image
The Guardian view on the Northern Ireland protocol: make it work | Editorial
Editorial: Government threats to abandon the deal only stir more grievance and put Britain’s reputation as a reliable partner in jeopardy

Editorial

11, May, 2022 @5:52 PM

Article image
It’s the defining issue of Brexit, but who understands Northern Ireland? | Matthew O’Toole
When I worked at No 10, Westminster was oblivious to its complexity, says Matthew O’Toole

Matthew O'Toole

21, Jan, 2019 @8:00 AM

Article image
The Guardian view on the Northern Ireland protocol bill: provocative and needless | Editorial
Editorial: At a time of economic crisis, Liz Truss has risked a downward spiral in relations with the EU for no good reason

Editorial

17, May, 2022 @5:51 PM

Article image
What unites Johnson and Hunt in Northern Ireland? An inability to pretend they care | Séamas O’Reilly
In Belfast, the Tory leadership hopefuls disregarded the biggest issue facing the region, says Derry writer Séamas O’Reilly

Séamas O’Reilly

04, Jul, 2019 @3:57 PM

Article image
The gap between reckless Brexit promises and reality will soon be too big to ignore | John Harris
Voters invested hope in the idea of leaving the EU. But a few years of queues and chaos could further erode public trust, says says Guardian columnist John Harris

John Harris

18, Oct, 2021 @5:00 AM

Article image
Johnson’s unworkable Brexit plan won’t solve the Northern Ireland border issue | Katy Hayward
The ‘two-border’ solution is cost-free for Britain, with all the consequences being felt on the island of Ireland, says Katy Hayward, author of Bordering on Brexit

Katy Hayward

03, Oct, 2019 @12:20 PM

Article image
Why is the Northern Ireland protocol still an issue? Actions have consequences | Fintan O'Toole
Someone tell Boris Johnson: you can’t bake your ‘oven-ready deal’ and then remove a key ingredient (even if it’s a sausage), says Irish Times columnist Fintan O’Toole

Fintan O’Toole

23, Jul, 2021 @7:00 AM

Article image
The Guardian view on Northern Ireland and Brexit: stick with the protocol | Editorial
Editorial: Threats to the agreement between the UK and the EU are coming from all quarters. This is a time for cool heads and practical compromises

Editorial

04, Feb, 2021 @6:47 PM

Article image
Theresa May’s problem is that her failings go far beyond Brexit | Rafael Behr
What is the government doing for schools, the NHS, the deficit? The little faith many Tory MPs have in their leader is sinking, says Guardian columnist Rafael Behr

Rafael Behr

29, Jan, 2018 @6:43 PM