The Guardian view on prescience in novels: reading the future | Editorial

Literature can be surprisingly accurate in predicting what lies ahead

When scientists hailed a breakthrough this month – a man with end-stage heart disease was given a genetically modified pig’s heart – some non-scientists found the idea familiar. The procedure had already been described by Malorie Blackman in her novel Pig Heart Boy.

Reality, it seems, can make fictions come true, and Blackman joins a distinguished line – Jonathan Swift (who posited, among other things, two moons for Mars); Aldous Huxley (oral contraception, mood medicine, test-tube babies); HG Wells (atomic bombs); Orwell (telescreens, mass surveillance) – of writers whose works acquire, over the years, the tingle of prescience. More recently a number of novelists were blindsided by an actual pandemic overtaking their invented plagues. Christina Sweeney-Baird’s The End of Men was finished in December 2019, Bethany Clift’s Last One at the Party was published in February 2021 and Oana Aristide’s Under the Blue a month later. Lawrence Wright’s The End of October (May 2020) even imagines a coronavirus arising in east Asia. And Joanna Kavenna’s 2019 novel Zed, set in a near future controlled by a tech giant, becomes more real every day.

But perhaps that is to look at the matter the wrong way round. Margaret Atwood has said, in relation to her own dystopia The Handmaid’s Tale, that it arose out of an acute sense of the then-present; she was responding to nuggets of misogynistic authoritarianism cropping up in the news. Blackman noticed speculation about modified pigs’ hearts in the press; epidemiologists had warned of the threat of a major global pandemic. Swift’s work often mocked the scientists of his day.

While it is true that all future is by definition fiction, these tales arise, argued Atwood, when a writer asks “what might happen if those trends continued … Would we like that? Is that where we want to live?” Seeming prophecy is thus a case of emotional and social insight tethered to current reality. In 1909, EM Forster published The Machine Stops, a short story in which “humanity, in its desire for comfort, had over-reached itself. It had exploited the riches of nature too far. Quietly and complacently, it was sinking into decadence, and progress had come to mean progress of the machine” – which, partly by shutting humanity into a cave underground, severs any relationship with the real world. It is an unnervingly accurate picture of the western world in 2020 lockdown – complete with isolations, Zoom-like calls and machine-controlled delivery of food and entertainment.

This is one of the great things fiction can do: pay a particular kind of attention. It is a kind of eavesdropping, and a looking under the surfaces of things. Seen like this, it makes sense that a group of literary scholars in Germany was tasked with predicting civil unrest by reading novels and plays – and especially by noting reactions to them. Was a novel censored? Whom by, and why? Was it garlanded or a bestseller? They were not surprised when Azerbaijan, which had been supplying Georgian libraries with anti-Armenian books, went to war in Nagorno-Karabakh. The programme was halted after three years, but the point had been made. Though novelists are not seers, we would do well not to underestimate their grasp on what is to come.

Contributor

Editorial

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Guardian view on lockdown reading: more than escapism | Editorial
Editorial:It’s no surprise that people read a lot when stuck at home. But novels are more than a way to kill time

Editorial

19, Apr, 2020 @5:25 PM

Article image
From science fiction to dystopian fact | Letters
Letters: We shouldn’t be surprised when sci-fi writers correctly predict the future, says Garth Groombridge, while Frances Starbuck detects the shadow of Edgar Allan Poe looming over the current crisis at No 10

Letters

04, Feb, 2022 @5:38 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on declining authors’ pay: an unequal burden | Editorial
Editorial: A steep slump in average earnings not only affects individuals, but impoverishes literature by dictating which stories get told

Editorial

11, Dec, 2022 @6:25 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on a book glut: to the victor go the spoils? | Editorial
Editorial: Many publishers are enjoying record sales – but not all. We must take care that those with the biggest names and deepest pockets are not the only beneficiaries

Editorial

23, Aug, 2020 @5:25 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Margaret Atwood and the Booker: a testament to fiction | Editorial
Editorial: The prize has come in for justified criticism, its rules are imperfect. But this year’s authors are an exciting prospect

Editorial

06, Sep, 2019 @5:25 PM

Article image
The 100 best novels: No 56 – Brave New World by Aldous Huxley (1932)
Aldous Huxley’s vision of a future human race controlled by global capitalism is every bit as prescient as Orwell’s more famous dystopia, writes Robert McCrum

Robert McCrum

13, Oct, 2014 @4:45 AM

Article image
The Guardian view on feminism and sci-fi: asking what if women ruled the world | Editorial
Editorial: Naomi Alderman’s The Power is a bold addition to a genre that questions society’s rules

Editorial

11, Jun, 2017 @3:17 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on science fiction: The Broken Earth deserves its Hugo | Editorial
Editorial: The American writer NK Jemisin has now won the most prestigious award in science fiction three times. The planet should take notice

Editorial

24, Aug, 2018 @4:24 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on invisible women: cancelled by history, restored with care | Editorial
Editorial: A new book on George Orwell’s first wife examines how Eileen O’Shaughnessy’s life was erased

Editorial

06, Aug, 2023 @5:25 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on graphic novels: expanding the literary horizon | Editorial
Editorial: Nick Drnaso’s Sabrina presents the judges with an enviable problem of their own making – how to judge it against novels without pictures

Editorial

27, Jul, 2018 @4:16 PM