The EHRC is here to support the rights of all – whatever anyone says to the contrary | Kishwer Falkner

My commission is accused of shifting its approach to equality but this is far from the truth

It is 15 years since the Equality and Human Rights Commission, the independent body charged with protecting and promoting equality and human rights for everyone in Britain, came into being. We regulate and enforce human rights and equality laws and advance rights through carefully considered recommendations for reform. While we have made significant progress over the past 15 years, there will always be more to do.

We have many and varied stakeholders – knowledgeable and effective advocates in encouraging and challenging us to address the equality and human rights issues about which they care deeply. Our relationships with civic organisations, campaigners and those they represent are vitally important in helping to inform our thinking and our priorities. But with our vast remit and so many people and groups advocating on so many issues, it is inevitable that we can’t please all of them all of the time.

My position and integrity as the EHRC’s chair have come in for particular criticism by some stakeholders, who perceive that the commission has undergone a shift in its approach. I can’t speak for how the previous chair ran things, but I can say that what matters to me, to the board and our new chief executive is that we are determined to uphold our independence, impartiality, evidence-based decision-making and to resist undue influence from any quarter.

This has put us at odds with some of our stakeholders recently, but this isn’t new. The EHRC has often been criticised over the years and it is not a comfortable place to be in – for our commissioners, for our committed staff or for those stakeholders who disagree with us. But it is an unavoidable part of our role in regulating a legal framework that recognises nine protected characteristics, frequently with competing rights and needs.

We have a statutory duty to consider equality and human rights for everyone and that includes how the rights of one person, or group, might be affected by the rights of another. We do not allow our decisions and actions to be swayed by the loudest voices in any particular debate. We are accountable to parliament and held to exacting standards in fulfilling our mandate.

The legal basis for our governance, including the process for the appointment of the chair and commissioners, is enshrined in our founding legislation and is unchanged since the EHRC was established. It applied to my appointment as it did for those of my predecessors under previous Labour, coalition and Conservative governments.

The latest pressure arises from the polarised debates about the rights of transgender people, who face hate crime and barriers to changing their legal gender, such as excessively long waiting times for gender identity clinics. This is wrong and we have been lobbying government to do something about it. We have also been upholding the rights of transgender people at work, in recent legal interventions with employers.

Where we have modified our position on self-ID for trans people or the Gender Recognition Act, we have done so because new evidence about the tension between trans and women’s rights is emerging. Only last week, there have been seemingly contradictory legal judgments on the meaning of “sex” in law. Other cases are in the pipeline. Recently, public responses to our strategic plan have shown a huge increase in concern about these competing rights.

Last month, I wrote to the Scottish government to advise that further consideration is needed to some specific aspects of the proposals, to take account of issues raised in relation to data collection, single-sex service provision and new case law. I said absolutely nothing to suggest any wavering of our commitment to trans rights.

We have also been accused of standing in the way of a ban on “conversion therapy”. Not true. Conversion therapy is harmful and the EHRC supports it ending for both sexual orientation and being transgender. We have advised the UK government that a lack of legal definitions of terms such as “being trans” risks ambiguity about what will be caught by the ban and what will not.

We recommended that parliament conducts comprehensive scrutiny of the legislation to ensure not only that harmful practices are prevented but also that transgender people can receive the advice and support they need.

Debate about contested issues is necessary and I admire all who stand up for rights and causes, fight discrimination and seek equality and justice. They help our country to shape a fairer future. And so do we.

So I ask those – and it is a minority – who seek to undermine the EHRC: what do they hope to achieve and who do they think will protect and advance equality and human rights in our country if they have their wish?

Baroness Falkner is the chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission


Kishwer Falkner

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
If Labour is truly the party of equality, it wouldn’t shut down the trans debate | Sonia Sodha
The party sent the wrong message in denying a platform to a gender-critical group

Sonia Sodha

02, Oct, 2022 @8:00 AM

Article image
Stoking a culture war? No, Nicola Sturgeon, this is about balancing conflicting rights | Sonia Sodha
Scottish gender reform plans jeopardise legal protections for women

Sonia Sodha

21, Jan, 2023 @7:00 PM

Article image
Sturgeon’s plans to reform gender law could leave Tories as the champions of women’s rights | Sonia Sodha
The Scottish leader must take heed of changing views on the treatment of gender dysphoria

Sonia Sodha

27, Nov, 2022 @8:00 AM

Article image
The ‘gay cake’ fight: why the bakers had a right to refuse this order | Kenan Malik
A bakery was justified in refusing to decorate a cake with a slogan it didn’t agree with

Kenan Malik

06, May, 2018 @5:00 AM

Article image
The Observer view on the right to free expression | Observer editorial
Whatever your view on sex and gender, freedom of speech is key

Observer editorial

27, Jun, 2021 @5:30 AM

Article image
The Observer view on the EHRC decision on Scotland’s gender recognition reforms | Observer editorial
The UK equalities watchdog has called for more consultation with all those affected by proposed changes

Observer editorial

30, Jan, 2022 @6:30 AM

Article image
When it comes to race and gender, oppressed people can be oppressors too | Sonia Sodha
From lesbians being denounced as bigots to East African Asians racially abusing black people, the lines of discrimination are not always clear

Sonia Sodha

14, Feb, 2021 @9:00 AM

Article image
The Observer view on the high court's ruling on puberty blocking drugs for children | Observer editorial
The court was correct to halt a disturbing trend among clinicians to assume those as young as 10 were fit to make life-altering decisions about gender identity

Observer editorial

06, Dec, 2020 @8:15 AM

Article image
If a lesbian only desires same-sex dates that’s not bigotry, it’s her right | Sonia Sodha
At Allison Bailey’s employment tribunal, breaking the ‘cotton ceiling’ was equated to racial integration, an idea that is as wrong as it is dangerous

Sonia Sodha

29, May, 2022 @6:30 AM

Article image
I came out late – only to find that lesbians had slipped to the back of the queue | Kathleen Stock
The co-director of the Lesbian Project, launched last week, tells why the ‘L’ of LGBTQ+ must not be allowed to disappear into the rainbow soup

Kathleen Stock

12, Mar, 2023 @9:30 AM