James Bond's mission stays the same: letting Britain think it's still a superpower | Dan Sabbagh

In the real version of the United Kingdom, 007 might be queuing for petrol in his gleaming Aston Martin

It’s no time to die for James Bond, which is a relief, because Britain’s best-known secret agent has plenty of work to do. There are the well-worn problems of tackling Ernst Stavro Blofeld, one explosion at a time, and the not inconsiderable task of reviving Britain’s pandemic-hit cinema industry, one increasingly expensive ticket at a time. But all this pales somewhat against what might be Bond’s true purpose: as a not very secret weapon in the struggle to assert Britain’s place as a cultural superpower.

Some parts of the British state claim to have an ambivalent relationship to 007, not least the real-life version of his employer, MI6. They complain that Bond’s shoot first, cause a diplomatic crisis later approach is hardly a realistic advert for the undramatic work of intelligence – especially when it comes to pay and expenses. “You won’t find any Aston Martins in the staff car park,” a Whitehall insider tetchily said. Despite recent and necessary efforts to bring the franchise more in line with some modern concerns, the films are not considered an advert for the diverse workforce MI6 needs to attract.

And yet … this is the same real-life spy agency that recently decided it wanted to appoint a “Q”, a technology mastermind, just like in the films – played latterly by Ben Whishaw – to act as one of the organisation’s deputies. Quite why this was necessary is not obvious, given the agency is unlikely to be developing dry humour or “smart blood”, although the job advert did insist that “MI6 needs to be at the cutting-edge of technology in order to stay ahead”, in case anybody was in doubt.

The Bond films, however, are more than just a convenient device for recruiting senior spies via the news media. At a time when Britain is struggling to provide fuel for petrol tanks and cheap gas during a warm September, following on the heels of the US in its retreat from Afghanistan and getting involved in a bizarre, Franglais-laden tit-for-tat with Emmanuel Macron, James Bond presents an alternative universe in which a powerful British secret service ranges across the world, albeit to foil dastardly, non-state enemies.

It is not difficult to distinguish between fact and fiction, but in the movies some impressions linger. If a Bond movie shows Q controlling a set of vast subterranean screens tracking villains around London, most of the viewing public who do not work in intelligence would be tempted to conclude that glitzy, high-definition capabilities are readily available. Politicians, in Britain at least, are often disappointed by the reality they find, which is partly why Boris Johnson spent £9m to create a new screen-laden situation room underneath Downing Street earlier this year.

Such is the importance attached to Bond that the government provides a level of support to the franchise that if it were a bank it might have to be nationalised. Some of this dates back to the Casino Royale debacle – where much of the 2006 film (the best, surely, of the Daniel Craig era) was shot in the Czech Republic. Preventing a repeat helped justify a revamp of the film tax rules in 2007, with Bond one of the biggest beneficiaries. An analysis published last year concluded that No Time To Die had received £47m in tax credits on a production spend of £200m.

For a movie aiming to gross in the region of $1bn (£741m) at the global box office, this could be argued as generous, although the film industry is an important source of skilled, creative jobs in Britain. But the help does not stop there. Almost a decade ago, Bond was product-placed in the Olympic Games opening ceremony, complete with a once-in-a-lifetime cameo from the Queen, an endorsement so remarkable that it could not have been bought. This time round, No Time To Die features British soldiers, the HMS Dragon warship and part of RAF Brize Norton doubling up for a Norwegian Nato base from an eager-to-help military.

It is not hard to see the thinking behind this, given that the film will draw the bulk of its audience overseas. Whatever the reality of Britain’s standing in the world, the projection of power that comes via a Bond movie is something the UK cannot otherwise buy.

  • Dan Sabbagh is the Guardian’s defence and security editor


Dan Sabbagh

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Guardian view on the defence review: making ends meet in troubled times | Editorial
Editorial: The British government’s plans put some things right but leave important issues unresolved


23, Nov, 2015 @7:38 PM

Article image
James Bond’s got a Licence to Shill: lobbying for the snooper’s charter | Marina Hyde
007 is back and so – with spytastic synchronicity between cinema and state – is a GCHQ publicity drive. Snowden Asfaka and the fourth nipple will have to wait

Marina Hyde

30, Oct, 2015 @7:17 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Theresa May’s Munich speech: partnership should be indivisible | Editorial
Editorial: Britain is offering commitment and cooperation to Europe on security and intelligence. It should do the same in its Brexit strategy


16, Feb, 2018 @10:30 PM

Article image
MI6, why would minorities spy for a society they don’t feel part of? | Hugh Muir
Making the secret service more multicultural is laudable, aiding the national interest. But it’s weighed with historical baggage and burdened by context

Hugh Muir

03, Mar, 2017 @10:14 AM

Article image
So we’ve apologised for Abdel Hakim Belhaj’s rendition. But who did it? | Richard Norton-Taylor
Today there was no admission of liability, just the same old excuse about an MI6 scandal, says the former Guardian security writer Richard Norton-Taylor

Richard Norton-Taylor

10, May, 2018 @5:46 PM

Article image
Boris Johnson fails to understand that intelligence means doubt | Gaby Hinsliff
The foreign secretary’s claims over the Skripal poisoning have handed Putin a major propaganda victory. Security service investigations come peppered with caveats, says Guardian columnist Gaby Hinsliff

Gaby Hinsliff

05, Apr, 2018 @5:22 PM

Article image
James Bond would not get job with real MI6, says spy chief
Alex Younger says while Bond has ‘created a powerful brand’ for MI6, the fictional agent bears little resemblance to reality

Ewen MacAskill Defence and security correspondent

08, Dec, 2016 @2:50 PM

Article image
Britain carries out first Syria airstrikes after MPs approve action against Isis
MoD confirms that jets carried out ‘first offensive operation over Syria and have conducted strikes’ hours after MPs voted in favour of military action

Patrick Wintour Political editor

03, Dec, 2015 @8:53 AM

Article image
MI6 boss: George Smiley a better role model for agents than James Bond
Sir Alex Younger, known in agency circles as C, says 007’s ‘brash antics’ give a misleading portrayal of life in the service

Ewen MacAskill Defence and intelligence correspondent

28, Sep, 2017 @6:03 PM

Article image
The argument for intervening in Syria is strong – but not strong enough | Wes Streeting
I will be voting against airstrikes. David Cameron’s case doesn’t add up to the comprehensive strategy that we need to end war in Syria and defeat Isis

Wes Streeting

30, Nov, 2015 @8:30 AM