I went to work for Keir Starmer because he promised to unite the party. I regret it now | Simon Fletcher

The Labour leader is busy unravelling the alliance he built with the left in order to get the job

  • Simon Fletcher is a former adviser to Labour party leaders Keir Starmer, Jeremy Corbyn and Ed Miliband

Keir Starmer would not have been elected as Labour leader if he had suggested publicly or privately that he intended to re-establish weighted votes for MPs in leadership elections, taking power away from regular members and ensuring future leadership contests would be less inclusive than the one he himself won. Labour party members would not have voted to abrogate their own rights. The triumphalism of some on the party’s right following the changes to the party’s rulebook will be greeted with resentment by thousands of party members.

Briefings from allies of the leadership say that the reforms show Labour has changed, drawing a line under the Jeremy Corbyn years and focusing outward. Instead, they have shown that Labour hasn’t changed at all – it is still focused on internal fights. Until someone decides to take a lead to stop the cycle of open strife, the party will struggle to win a general election.

It should be obvious to any sober observer that a few changes to Labour’s leadership rules are not going to benefit the party by electrifying swing voters in marginal seats or mobilising supporters in its strongholds. But the cost paid on the other side of the equation in infighting, squabbling and deepening mutual suspicion will be heavy.

Last week, Keir Starmer told Labour’s shadow cabinet that he wanted a return to the electoral college, a system introduced some 40 years ago but then abolished by Ed Miliband in 2014, which gives MPs’ votes the same weight as hundreds of thousands of members combined. Many experienced Labour politicians knew immediately this strategy would not succeed. They were right.

Although it was claimed that the reforms would enhance trade union influence, they were poorly received at a meeting of Labour’s affiliated unions last Wednesday and were dropped by Friday. Then new proposals came forward, increasing the number of nominations candidates must secure from MPs from 10% to 20% of the parliamentary party.

Of the candidates who stood for the Labour leadership in 2010, only David and Ed Miliband would have met the new threshold to be a candidate. Ed Balls, Diane Abbott and Andy Burnham would not have made the ballot. In 2015, only Andy Burnham and Yvette Cooper passed this new quota. No Liz Kendall. No Jeremy Corbyn, the eventual winner. Most strikingly, in 2020 Keir Starmer alone met the criteria.

Of course, members of parliament would have nominated differently under such constraints – but not in a good way. Under the new scheme, deal-making in private before a final shortlist emerges will become much more important than open debate in the country. Whichever way you look at it, it is designed to reduce the range of candidates open for unions and members to eventually decide between, narrowing their choices considerably before a single vote is cast.

The dispute has overshadowed Labour’s first conference since the pandemic struck. Shadow cabinet members Andy McDonald and Angela Rayner kicked off conference by launching a set of policies for working people that the party could unite around, but more attention was on the fight over the rulebook. McDonald has now resigned from the shadow cabinet, stating that Keir Starmer has made Labour “more divided than ever”. Likewise, Ed Miliband set out a powerful agenda on climate change but his speech was obscured by these other dramas. It looks bad, and responsibility for these presentational choices lies with the party leadership.

During his leadership election, Starmer sold himself as the unity candidate and said the party would not “oversteer” from many of the best elements of the Corbyn era. “We are not going to trash the last Labour government … nor are we going to trash the last four years”, was the line, and the 2017 manifesto was to be treated as a “foundational” document.

These promises were backed by the extending of an olive branch to the left. So when I was approached to join Starmer’s campaign after working for left campaigns and politicians including Jeremy Corbyn, I saw the commitment to policies I strongly support as clear common ground between the two eras.

Unfortunately, the shortfall between what was promised and what has happened since raises some very big questions for thousands on the left and soft left who voted for Starmer to be leader.

It is very hard for me to say this because in politics people aren’t supposed to admit they got something wrong. But while the unifying pitch that Starmer put to the membership was open, conciliatory and correct – and explains the big vote he secured – it has not been delivered. It sadly proved to be the wrong thing, for me at least, to have supported that leadership campaign. From my own perspective it was a mistake and ultimately a political dead end. Starmer’s leadership constructed an alliance and then unravelled it. You cannot promise unity then deliberately pick fights and expect people to say that is OK. It’s not.

There is plenty of good work being done by people at all levels of the Labour party: great metro mayors, the leadership of Wales, councillors, fantastic forward-thinking trade unionists, activists, members, organisers, shadow cabinet members. An effective, modern left is more likely to emerge from that than from old playbooks at the party conference.

• Simon Fletcher is a former adviser to Keir Starmer, Jeremy Corbyn and Ed Miliband

Contributor

Simon Fletcher

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Is Keir Starmer failing to call out the government over coronavirus? | Katy Balls
Allies of the Labour leadership candidate say intervening could be seen as premature and opportunistic, says Katy Balls, the Spectator’s deputy political editor

Katy Balls

02, Apr, 2020 @1:06 PM

Article image
Keir Starmer is shrinking the Labour party | Tom Blackburn
Expelling leftwing members after thousands have left spells the end for the ‘broad church’, says New Socialist founding editor Tom Blackburn

Tom Blackburn

25, Jul, 2021 @1:00 PM

Article image
Keir Starmer has what it takes to be Labour leader, but some are unconvinced | Polly Toynbee
After a day on the frontrunner’s phonebank talking to members, it is clear how much is at stake in this contest, says Guardian columnist Polly Toynbee

Polly Toynbee

17, Feb, 2020 @7:11 PM

Article image
This leadership race is starting to unite the Labour party | Sienna Rodgers
The left will not go quietly, but the gaping division between membership and MPs has narrowed, says Sienna Rodgers, editor of LabourList

Sienna Rodgers

04, Mar, 2020 @2:12 PM

Article image
Can Keir Starmer pass the tests set by the left and win the Labour leadership? | Chaminda Jayanetti
He needs to convince members that his pragmatism can align with principles on anti-austerity and immigration, says journalist Chaminda Jayanetti

Chaminda Jayanetti

03, Jan, 2020 @4:18 PM

Article image
Keir Starmer won the party handsomely. Now he must start convincing the nation | Andrew Rawnsley

Andrew Rawnsley

05, Apr, 2020 @8:00 AM

Article image
Keir Starmer, your party has a whole new race problem | Aditya Chakrabortty
In a pivot towards its lost ‘red wall’, Labour is letting Islamophobia go unchecked. As a tactic, it can only fail, says Guardian columnist Aditya Chakrabortty

Aditya Chakrabortty

07, Jul, 2021 @5:02 PM

Article image
Keir Starmer calls to rebuild party as 'force for good'
YouGov poll shows Starmer in lead to head party over nearest rival Rebecca Long-Bailey

Rajeev Syal

02, Jan, 2020 @7:49 PM

Article image
Jeremy Corbyn's local Labour party backs Keir Starmer for leadership
Members in Islington North narrowly nominate him over Rebecca Long-Bailey

Michael Savage Policy editor

08, Feb, 2020 @5:43 PM

Article image
Keir Starmer stood for party unity – he should reinstate Jeremy Corbyn | Hilary Wainwright
The former leader has acknowledged Labour should have done better, and the EHRC report makes clear that his comments are not a disciplinary matter, says Red Pepper co-editor Hilary Wainwright

Hilary Wainwright

03, Nov, 2020 @1:03 PM