The Guardian view on Labour’s voting plans: empower an electorate | Editorial

Sir Keir Starmer ought to be in the business of dispersing power by pushing for more democracy, not less

In Britain, there has been a modern trend to make democracy more democratic. The devolved legislatures set up in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales use proportional electoral systems to reflect their distinctive politics. In England and Wales, elections for mayors and police and crime commissioners have been run on a supplementary vote system, opening the door to independents and smaller parties. Similarly, political parties have embraced a greater degree of internal democracy, conscious that they need constant rejuvenating – and an essential element in that business is bringing members in and giving them a role by allowing them a vote. Yet the two main parties are displaying worrying signs that they prefer to centralise rather than disperse, and share, power.

The Conservative party wants to replace this supplementary vote system, where it still exists in England, with the same first-past-the-post (FPTP) system as the Commons. This is hardly a surprise: out of the last 20 general elections since 1950 the Conservatives have won power two-thirds of the time, while on almost every occasion there was a majority of votes for anti-Tory parties. The right drove out, via Brexit, a proportional system for the European parliament by abandoning it. A form of PR would unlock different institutions and cultures in British political life.

More than 150 local Labour parties have submitted motions backing PR ahead of the party conference votes next week, providing Sir Keir Starmer with a chance to grasp the nettle of electoral reform. He appears reluctant to back such changes, sensing perhaps little public appetite to reform the voting system. A form of PR would ensure that voter choice is better reflected in parliament. The traditional argument in favour of FPTP, that it tends to produce stable majority governments, was disproved for almost the whole of the last decade when the UK was run by a coalition or minority administration.

Sir Keir also wants to turn the clock back to an electoral college to elect Labour leaders. His plan surprised trade unions, which felt ambushed. Their call to pause the proposals so that the implications could be digested ought to be heeded. There may be a case to change the rules, but Labour’s leader has not made it. He should do so rather than daring his opponents to vote against him at conference. Sir Keir was elected via a system where members, affiliated members and registered supporters all participated on an equal basis. He wants instead to give MPs, unions and party members one-third of the votes each, and to make it harder to deselect parliamentarians.

These changes increase the influence of trade unions and MPs at the expense of party members. MPs already act as gatekeepers, narrowing the field of leadership contenders before the wider membership makes the final choice. This mechanism ought to deal with the problem of a Labour leader being elected without sufficient confidence in parliament.

Labour’s grassroots are also not all leftwing ideologues. True, a “one member, one vote” electoral system saw first a leftwinger, Jeremy Corbyn, elected and then Sir Keir, on a Corbynite platform. But in 2010, under an electoral college system the soft-left Ed Miliband won power while Labour’s membership backed his centrist brother, David. One member, one vote had enfranchised a dreamier Labour sect. But a form of open franchise is a precondition of the party refreshing its base. And that, like PR, would be good for British democracy at large.

• This article was amended on 27 September 2021. A previous version referred in one paragraph to proportional representation when it meant to refer to the supplementary vote system.

Contributor

Editorial

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Guardian view on Starmer’s Labour: time to take on the Tories | Editorial
Editorial: The Labour leader must know his party faces existential implications if it suffers a historic fifth election defeat

Editorial

26, Sep, 2021 @4:53 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Labour’s leadership race: a long road back | Editorial
Editorial: After a catastrophic election, the party’s contest to replace Jeremy Corbyn must be conducted in a spirit of honesty and humility

Editorial

06, Jan, 2020 @6:36 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Labour’s task: reading the signs of the times | Editorial
Editorial: Keir Starmer’s new team should draw on Labour’s history and traditions as it develops a vision for when the worst of this crisis is over

Editorial

12, Apr, 2020 @5:30 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Keir Starmer’s speech: in search of a vision | Editorial
Editorial: The Labour leader was speaking more to his party than the country in Brighton

Editorial

29, Sep, 2021 @6:53 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Keir Starmer: a serious politician
Editorial: Labour’s new leader exudes competence and idealism. But where is he going?

Editorial

06, Apr, 2020 @6:35 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Labour and antisemitism: a question of leadership | Editorial
Editorial: After the party’s ‘day of shame’ the suspension of Jeremy Corbyn risks turning the opposition inward at a crucial time for British politics

Editorial

29, Oct, 2020 @7:35 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the Labour leadership: a deep and wide debate | Editorial
Editorial: Lisa Nandy is almost certain to be on the ballot for members to choose the next Labour leader. She offers a change not just of speed, but of direction for the party

Editorial

21, Jan, 2020 @6:29 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on electoral reform: an argument Labour needs to have | Editorial
Editorial: Whichever candidates get through the current stage of the leadership race, proportional representation must be among the ideas they take with them

Editorial

12, Jan, 2020 @6:50 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Keir Starmer: a very different kind of leader | Editorial
Editorial: The Labour leader will need policies, especially economic ones, beyond championing a civic Britishness to outflank political nationalism

Editorial

22, Sep, 2020 @6:17 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Labour’s task: a need to believe
Editorial: Keir Starmer’s speech may mark a watershed between the politics of the pandemic and the politics of post-Covid Britain

Editorial

18, Feb, 2021 @6:27 PM