Condom ‘stealthing’ is a vile practice. California is right to ban it | Moira Donegan

Twelve per cent of young women have experienced stealthing – and 10% of young men have perpetrated it. The law is finally catching up

She told him a condom was “non-negotiable,” and that if he would rather not use one, she would leave. The young woman, identified as “Sara” in a 2017 study, describes the encounter, saying, “I set a boundary. I was very explicit.” Yet she then discovered that her partner, a man she’d been seeing for a couple of weeks, had secretly removed the condom during sex.

“I ended up talking to him about it later,” Sara told the study’s author, the feminist civil rights attorney Alexandra Brodsky. “He told me, ‘Don’t worry about it, trust me.’ That stuck with me, because he’d literally proven himself to be unworthy of my trust.”

The man who removed the condom was telling her to trust him not to put her at risk for the potential consequences of unprotected sex – for STD infection, or for unplanned pregnancy. But if he was someone she could trust on those issues, he never would have removed the condom in the first place.

Sara was a victim of a phenomenon that, according to one study, 12% of young women say they have experienced, and, according to another, 10% of young men say they have perpetrated. Until now, however, the act has had no legal recognition and no name other than the one given to it by its perpetrators: “stealthing”, the non-consensual removal of a condom.

Now, the violation experienced by Sara and others may finally be made illegal, at least in one state. A bill introduced by California Assemblywoman Cristina Garcia has passed both houses of the state’s legislature, and would make non-consensual condom removal a civil offense. It now awaits a signature from Governor Gavin Newsom.

If the bill goes into effect, it would give victims the power to sue men who removed condoms without their permission for the non-criminal charge of sexual battery and open the door for monetary damages. The Wisconsin and New York legislatures are considering similar bills. If California’s is signed, the state will become the first in the nation to recognize stealthing as a violation in law.

Because the bill makes stealthing a civil offense, not a crime, it does not create the possibility that perpetrators will serve prison time. Instead, it makes them liable for fines and penalties if their victims prevail in court. (The pending bills in Wisconsin and New York do have criminal provisions.) But Brodsky believes that the worthiness of a civil avenue for justice should not be overlooked. “I’m glad to see California pursuing this approach,” she told me. “In my experience, many survivors find the kinds of outcomes available in civil litigation – including money damages – more meaningful and useful.”

Brodsky points out that civil courts have lower burdens of proof and offer rewards for the victims, not only punishments for the assailants. The symbolic value of the bill, too, is worth noting: the possibility for stealthing victims to have their day in court, and be remunerated for the harm they suffered, offers a route to recognition for a kind of sexual abuse that institutions have historically ignored.

For women like Sara, the reality that what their partners did to them was not right is intuitive. In Brodsky’s study, victims of stealthing recount being worried about STIs and pregnancy. These worries, they observed, seem to fall almost exclusively on their shoulders, even though the removal of the condom had not been their idea and had happened without their permission. One woman, referred to as “Rebecca”, told Brodsky that after the incident, her assailant refused to help her pay for emergency contraceptives.

“None of it worried him,” she said. “It didn’t perturb him. My potential pregnancy, my potential STI. That was my burden.” Rebecca had a reason to be worried: a 2019 survey on stealthing found that men who engaged in the practice were much more likely to be infected with an STD than men who didn’t (at a rate of 29.5% to 15.1%) and were much more likely to have sired an unintended pregnancy (at a rate of 46.7% to 25.8%).

But in addition to the medical and material concerns, women and others who have been victims of stealthing describe the incidents as degrading, hurtful and wounding to their self-respect. The removal of the condom represents a willingness to discard their preferences, an indifference to their safety and a contempt for their right to control their own bodies – and all of this comes from men who, only a few moments earlier, they had believed they could trust.

There is empirical evidence to support their sense of betrayal: the 2019 survey found that men who engaged in stealthing also had greater hostility towards women. In Brodsky’s study, a review of online communities for stealthing practitioners supports the notion that non-consensual condom removal by heterosexual men is motivated by misogynist disdain; the men, quoted at length, spoke of their own contempt for women and scorn for their partners’ desire for a condom in terms that I will not repeat here.

Stealthing poses high-stakes material risks to victims, as well as deeply felt harms to their dignity. It is galling that the practice was not already illegal. Both our law and our culture have a long history of ignoring gendered violence, and of lacking the rhetorical frameworks that make such harm legible – even when, as seems to be true in the case of stealthing, that harm is very common.

Rebecca, the survivor quoted in the 2017 study, said that she fielded many calls about the practice in her job at a local rape crisis hotline. “The stories often start the same way: ‘I’m not sure this is rape, but …’”

Melissa Sargent, the Wisconsin state representative who has sponsored the anti-stealthing bill there, also says she has been contacted by women who say they were victims of stealthing. “Everyone has their own story,” Sargent told the Associated Press. “But the common thread is, this happened to me, I knew it wasn’t right, but I didn’t know what to call it.”

One hope is that the passage of the California law might help such victims know what to call it. The stealthing bill can help make clear and definite what might have otherwise been an inchoate sense of having been wronged. With the passage of the California bill, stealthing victims will be able to see themselves as worthy of dignity, of having a right to control their own bodies, and of being entitled to negotiate their own sex lives without coercion or tricks. And the law will see them that way, too.

• This article was amended on 15 September 2021 to correct the link to the study about female victims of “stealthing”.

  • Moira Donegan is a Guardian US columnist

Contributor

Moira Donegan

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
‘Stealthing’: California poised to outlaw removing condom without consent during sex
State would be first in US to ban practice, allowing victims to sue perpetrators

Dani Anguiano and agencies

09, Sep, 2021 @8:27 PM

Article image
Has #MeToo gone too far, or not far enough? The answer is both | Laura Kipnis
What is at stake in Catherine Deneuve’s recent letter in Le Monde attacking the feminist movement? It’s a question of where you draw the line

Laura Kipnis

13, Jan, 2018 @7:00 AM

Article image
Was it assault or kinky sex, Eric Schneiderman? Here's the difference | Susan Wright
The now-ex New York attorney general implied that women’s assault claims were simply rough sex. It’s important to understand the difference between the two

Susan Wright

09, May, 2018 @10:00 AM

Article image
Republicans overplayed their hand in California – and Democrats are laughing | Lloyd Green
Larry Elder just discovered that his brand appeals to a tiny fraction of voters. Republican governors in Texas and Florida may learn similar lessons

Lloyd Green

15, Sep, 2021 @1:39 PM

Article image
Is Caitlyn Jenner serious – or is her bid for California governor a grubby PR stunt? | Arwa Mahdawi
The reality star’s run seems completely depressing – especially aligned with a party that wants to erode LGBTQ rights

Arwa Mahdawi

24, Jul, 2021 @1:00 PM

Article image
Why a porn star is fighting California's condom law: 'It's a women's rights issue'
Adult film actor Tasha Reign says a proposed law that would enforce condom use on set is an assault on her rights over her own body

Maria L La Ganga in San Diego, California

18, Oct, 2016 @10:00 AM

Article image
'Yes means yes' standard for sexual assault moves to California high schools
First-in-the-nation measure requires high schools to teach ‘different forms of sexual harassment and violence’ and include lessons on seeking sexual consent

Anita Chabria in Sacramento

10, Sep, 2015 @12:52 PM

Article image
How to prevent rape: it starts with awkward conversations with our teens | Jessica Reed
Jessica Reed: Is there a way to teach young people to seek affirmative consent before (and during) sex? Yes, but it requires a willingness to tackle difficult scenarios head on

Jessica Reed

17, Sep, 2014 @5:15 AM

Article image
Elizabeth Warren's life story proves she's right to put childcare first | Jill Filipovic
The senator recognizes how lucky she was to have help raising her kids in a country that leaves mothers hanging

Jill Filipovic

22, Feb, 2019 @11:00 AM

Article image
Sexual violence against girls - we must open our eyes to terrible truths | Deborah Orr

Deborah Orr: A report this week revealed that girls are being abused by other children. Why do adults fail to understand how vulnerable and alone adolescent girls can be?

Deborah Orr

29, Nov, 2013 @7:30 PM