Think big on climate: the transformation of society in months has been done before | George Monbiot

The astonishing story of how the US entered the second world war should be on everyone’s minds as Cop26 approaches

Fatalism creeps across our movements like rust. In conversations with scientists and activists, I hear the same words, over and again: “We’re screwed.” Government plans are too little, too late. They are unlikely to prevent the Earth’s systems from flipping into new states hostile to humans and many other species.

What we need, to stand a high chance of stabilising our life support systems, is not slow and incremental change but sudden and drastic action. And this is widely considered impossible. There’s no money; governments are powerless; people won’t tolerate anything more ambitious than the tepid measures they have proposed. Or so we are told. It’s a stark illustration of a general rule: political failure is, at heart, a failure of imagination.

Let’s set aside the obvious lessons of the pandemic, when the magic money tree miraculously burst into leaf, governments discovered they could govern (albeit with varying degrees of competence) and people were prepared radically to change their behaviour. There’s a bigger and more powerful example. It’s what happened when the US joined the second world war.

There’s discomfort in environmental circles with military analogies. But the war is among the few precedents and metaphors that almost everyone can grasp. And we would be foolish not to learn from this remarkable lesson.

Before the US declared war, President Franklin Roosevelt had begun to draft troops and build his “arsenal of democracy”: the materiel with which he supplied the allied forces. To “outbuild Hitler”, he called for levels of production widely considered impossible. But after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on 7 December 1941, the impossible happened.

The day after the attack, Roosevelt requested and achieved a declaration of war from Congress. He immediately began to reorganise not only the government but the entire nation. He set up a series of agencies that were lightly overseen but coordinated through simple but effective measures such as the “controlled materials plan”.

He introduced, for the first time in US history, general federal income taxes. The government rapidly raised the top rate until, in 1944, it reached 94%. It issued war bonds and borrowed massively. Between 1940 and 1945, total government spending rose roughly tenfold. Astonishingly the US government spent more money (in current dollar terms) between 1942 and 1945 than it had between 1789 and 1941. From 1940 to 1944, its military budget rose by a factor of 42, outstripping Germany’s, Japan’s and the United Kingdom’s put together.

Civilian industries were entirely retooled for war. When the car industry was instructed to switch to military production, its massive equipment was immediately jack-hammered out of the floor and replaced, often in a matter of weeks, with new machines. General Motors began turning out tanks, aircraft engines, fighter planes, cannons and machine guns. Oldsmobile started making artillery shells; Pontiac produced anti-aircraft guns. By 1944, Ford was completing a long-range bomber plane almost every hour. During its three years of war, the US manufactured 87,000 naval vessels, including 27 aircraft carriers, 300,000 planes, 100,000 tanks and armoured cars and 44bn rounds of ammunition. Roosevelt described it as a “miracle of production”. But it wasn’t a miracle. It was the realisation of a well-laid plan.

The US war effort mobilised tens of millions of people. Between 1940 and the end of the war, the number of American troops rose 26-fold, while the civilian labour force increased by 10 million. Many of the new workers were women.

From 1942 until 1945, the manufacture of cars was banned. So were new household appliances and even the construction of new homes. Tyres and gasoline were strictly rationed; meat, butter, sugar, clothes and shoes were also limited. Rationing was considered fairer than taxing scarce goods: it ensured everyone received an equal share. A national speed limit of 35mph was imposed, to save fuel.

Posters warned people “When you ride ALONE, you ride with Hitler! Join a car-sharing club TODAY”, and asked “Is this trip really necessary?”. They cautioned: “Waste helps the enemy: conserve material”. Americans were urged to sign the Consumer’s Victory Pledge: “I will buy carefully; I will take good care of the things I have; I will waste nothing.” Every imaginable material – chewing gum wrappers, rubber bands, used cooking fat – was recycled.

So what stops the world from responding with the same decisive force to the greatest crisis humanity has ever faced? It’s not a lack of money or capacity or technology. If anything, digitisation would make such a transformation quicker and easier. It’s a problem that Roosevelt faced until Pearl Harbor: a lack of political will. Now, just as then, public hostility and indifference, encouraged by legacy industries (today, above all, fossil fuel, transport, infrastructure, meat and media), outweighs the demand for intervention.

The difference between 1941 and 2021 is that now the mobilisation needs to come first. We need to build popular movements so big that governments have no choice but to respond to them, if they wish to remain in office. We need to make politicians understand that the survival of life on Earth is more important than their ideological commitment to limited government. Preventing Earth’s systems from flipping means flipping our political systems.

So what is our Pearl Harbor moment? Well, how about now? After all, to extend the analogy, the Pacific seaboard of the US has recently come under unprecedented climatic attack. The heat domes, the droughts and fires there this year should have been enough to shock everyone out of their isolationism. But the gap between these events and people’s understanding of the forces that caused them is, arguably, the greatest public information failure in human history. We need bodies equivalent to Roosevelt’s Office of War Information, constantly reminding people of what is at stake.

As the US mobilisation showed, when governments and societies decide to be competent, they can achieve things that at other times are considered impossible. Catastrophe is not a matter of fate. It’s a matter of choice.

• George Monbiot is a Guardian columnist

• Join George Monbiot and guests for a Guardian Live online event on how climate justice can tackle the jobs crisis. Thursday 4th November, 8pm GMT | 9pm CET | 1pm PDT | 4pm EDT. Book tickets here.


George Monbiot

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Barclays funds climate breakdown. We are determined to make it stop | Seema Syeda
The bank is a huge backer of the fossil fuel industry and attendant climate catastrophe. Direct action is vital, says Momentum activist Seema Syeda

Seema Syeda

30, Mar, 2019 @10:00 AM

Article image
Don’t despair – climate change catastrophe can still be averted | Simon Lewis
The future looks fiery and dangerous, according to new reports. But political will and grassroots engagement can change this, says academic Simon Lewis

Simon Lewis

07, Aug, 2018 @12:11 PM

Article image
Fairness will be key to successfully tackling the climate crisis | Larry Elliott
Just as inequality fuelled the pandemic, it could wreck plans to cut emissions, says Guardian economics editor Larry Elliott

Larry Elliott

12, Aug, 2021 @7:00 AM

Article image
The IPCC report is clear: nothing short of transforming society will avert catastrophe | Patrick Vallance
Achieving net zero will require action from everyone – and a renewed emphasis on science and innovation, says Patrick Vallance, the UK government chief scientific adviser

Patrick Vallance

09, Aug, 2021 @11:43 AM

Article image
Something else is out of control in Australia: climate disaster denialism | Ketan Joshi
Myths about the bushfires grow online before being voiced by the rightwing press and politicians, says climate science expert Ketan Joshi

Ketan Joshi

08, Jan, 2020 @11:45 AM

Article image
There are three options in tackling climate change. Only one will work | Mayer Hillman
We’re now at a fork in the road: either we cut out fossil fuels completely, or we pass on a dying planet to our children, says social scientist Mayer Hillman

Mayer Hillman

30, Oct, 2018 @2:58 PM

Article image
Why don’t we treat the climate crisis with the same urgency as coronavirus? | Owen Jones
No Cobra meetings, no sombre speeches, yet the consequences of runaway global heating are catastrophic, says Guardian columnist Owen Jones

Owen Jones

05, Mar, 2020 @11:52 AM

Article image
The big polluters’ masterstroke was to blame the climate crisis on you and me | George Monbiot
Fossil fuel giants have known the harm they do for decades. But they created a system that absolves them of responsibility, says Guardian columnist George Monbiot

George Monbiot

09, Oct, 2019 @2:58 PM

Article image
Today, I aim to get arrested. It is the only real power climate protesters have | George Monbiot
By putting our bodies on the line and risking our liberty, we make this great neglected issue impossible to ignore, says George Monbiot

George Monbiot

16, Oct, 2019 @4:59 AM

Article image
The planet faces a climate emergency – but activists need to strap in for the long haul | Alice Bell
As COP25 meets in Spain, the momentum generated by this year’s global protests must continue into 2020 and beyond, says climate activist Alice Bell

Alice Bell

04, Dec, 2019 @1:32 PM