The Guardian view on the Covid report: a reckoning begins | Editorial

Multiple failings are revealed in a critique of pandemic policy by MPs. It marks the start of a long, hard process

The report published on Monday by two parliamentary committees is a stage in a longer process of learning from, and demanding accountability for, the UK government’s handling of the pandemic. Rightly, its authors call for the judge-led public inquiry into the disaster to start “as soon as possible”. The chair of the health and social care committee, Jeremy Hunt, and the chair of the science and technology committee, Greg Clark, are serious politicians with a degree of independence from Boris Johnson’s administration. But they are also both former Conservative cabinet members. So there can be no pretence that this preliminary review constitutes anything approaching a fully independent verdict. It is no surprise that some families bereaved during the past year and a half have angrily rejected it.

That said, the World Health Organization’s special envoy on Covid, Dr David Nabarro, has described the process as a “dense learning moment”. And it makes sense to take from the exercise what is useful, while recognising its limits. Many of the conclusions are unsurprising (the report focuses mostly on England, only now and then commenting on decisions taken by the devolved administrations). The flawed thinking that led to the delay in the initial lockdown, the lack of overall preparedness, and the slow and clumsy implementation of a test, trace and isolate programme: all these are familiar themes of the government’s many critics.

Nor will strong words about the way that the social care sector was excluded and neglected by decision-makers startle anyone, though it is good that the report takes the opportunity to point to wider failings, including a continued lack of clarity about new funding. The “intense interaction” between the NHS and social care has been a blind spot for far too long. Also welcome is the admission that councils were better placed than central government to oversee the test-and-trace system. This vastly expensive failure was not in any real sense an NHS programme, as the report points out in one of its more acerbic sections, “despite its branding”.

The disproportionate death toll among black and minority ethnic people, and younger adults with learning disabilities, is also highlighted. Specific policies to address health inequalities must be delivered in response. An apparent reluctance to learn from the pandemic experience and expertise of Asian countries is another instructive finding. Among the report’s conclusions are that the UK should be less insular when it comes to choosing experts and that ministers should be more adept at challenging them. Less secrecy and more transparency are part of this.

But the report also spares the government’s blushes. It lets the prime minister off the hook for the decision to plough on through autumn 2020, ignoring calls for a “circuit break” mini-lockdown. And while the scientists and medical staff who first developed and then delivered treatments and vaccines can justly be held up as sources of national pride, in this context the self-congratulatory tone jars.

The review’s remit was purposefully narrow. It says very little about the wider impact of the pandemic on the NHS, or what went on inside hospitals. Staff shortages that were already acute before Covid are now approaching an emergency. Also missing, except in fragments, is the wider political and social context. Why, for example, did the government decide early on (wrongly) that the British public “would not accept a lockdown for a significant period”? From the outset, as Prof Devi Sridhar has said, the aim should have been to “buy time without losing lives”. That ministers initially refused to do this was a culpable failure. Mr Clark declined, when interviewed, to suggest a timeframe for the public inquiry. This was disappointing. By far the best thing now for the country, and particularly the bereaved, would be to get on with it.

Contributor

Editorial

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Guardian view on PM's Covid plan: A risky bet on vaccines
Editorial: The more we allow infections to rise and the virus to replicate, the greater the chance that new variants will arrive that have the ability to evade our defences

Editorial

22, Feb, 2021 @7:34 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Boris Johnson: forever behind the Covid curve | Editorial
Editorial: As in March, the prime minister has been culpably slow to respond to a new phase of the crisis

Editorial

04, Jan, 2021 @7:28 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on political trust: voters put store by it, the PM does not | Editorial
Editorial: The prime minister wants no one in his cabinet to pay for their mistakes, a strategy that has failed

Editorial

28, Jun, 2021 @6:09 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on coexisting with Covid: new vaccines needed fast | Editorial
Editorial: There is a race between viral variants and vaccines – and for humanity’s sake the latter must win

Editorial

08, Feb, 2021 @7:23 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Covid testing failures: level with us | Editorial
Editorial: Ministers should talk frankly to the public about problems in the private laboratories they chose to deliver a vital service

Editorial

15, Sep, 2020 @6:08 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the Covid surge: no more room for complacency | Editorial
Editorial: The government must take a more cautious and focused approach to a pandemic that is not over

Editorial

20, Oct, 2021 @5:59 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Covid ethics: easier to enter lockdown than leave it | Editorial
Editorial: It is a concern that the prime minister opted to ease restrictions without a sure grasp of the facts

Editorial

17, May, 2021 @5:50 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the Covid inquiry: time to bring it on | Editorial
Editorial: Dominic Cummings’ charges have strengthened the case for the official public inquiry into coronavirus to be brought forward from next year

Editorial

27, May, 2021 @5:38 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the social care crisis: fix a broken system | Editorial
Editorial: With coronavirus exposing the inequities of care, the UK government should accept the case for an immediate cash injection

Editorial

25, Oct, 2020 @6:30 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on lionising Covid-19 workers: Johnson’s donkeys still fail them | Editorial
Editorial: Frontline staff deserve more than praise from the government. They need it to do its job

Editorial

27, Aug, 2020 @6:11 PM