Billionaire capitalists are designing humanity's future. Don't let them | Matt Shaw

Tech barons like Jeff Bezos want to colonize space and our oceans. Their visions of the future aren’t public-spirited or democratic

Last year a group of cryptocurrency investors purchased a decommissioned cruise liner, the Pacific Dawn, and renamed it the MS Satoshi, after the alleged creator of Bitcoin. The investors were members of the “seasteading” community, an experimental movement that wants to create autonomous, floating city-states in international waters. The Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel, a self-described anarcho-capitalist, is a major supporter of the movement – which, like space colonization, seems to attract the enthusiasm of a certain kind of fantastically rich and rightwing tech baron.

The MS Satoshi project was a failure. In a major blow to the seasteading movement, the ship was sold for parts in December, after the ship’s owners were unable to get insurance for their voyage into international waters. (They hold out hope, however, of creating a luxury development of science-fiction-esque pod apartments off the coast of New Jersey.)

The saga highlights one of the most troubling aspects of what could be called the futurism movement: a majority of the compelling and visible ideas about tomorrow are being conceived and developed by a tiny minority of ultra-wealthy individuals and private-sector companies.

It’s not hard to see the seductive appeal of these visions of the future. Beautiful digital renderings invite us into glowing and highly conceptual worlds, such as Elon Musk and SpaceX’s plan to build a glass-domed colony on Mars, or Jeff Bezos’s plan for floating space colonies. On Earth, Richard Branson’s Virgin Hyperloop One has worked with top architects around the world to produce spectacular, inspiring images of a world connected by zero-emission, 670mph vacuum–propelled pods. Uber, imagining self-flying taxis shuttling riders from roof to roof, unveiled 16 proposals for “skyports” designed by prominent corporate architecture firms. Underground, Musk’s Boring Company promises shorter commute times, while in our homes we are enchanted by the potential of Nest and Alexa. Like any good ideology, this privatized futurism affects everything from global infrastructures to kitchen appliances.

These kinds of projects use often fantastic imagery to inspire the public’s imagination and to build consensus around these visions. But unlike many of the forward-thinking proposals of the past – produced by a “public” of academics, artists and government agencies – today’s “future” is almost completely invented by private companies owned by tech billionaires. Why do they care about our imagination? What is at stake when we buy in? What does it mean when the future is privatized?

This kind of speculation is ultimately about dictating policy and ownership. If companies control the image of the future, then they control the future itself, and can control the infrastructure. Ultimately, they will define how society functions. Platforms like Amazon Web Services, Facebook and Robinhood have become massive infrastructures that control large parts of our economy and the public sphere.

Elon Musk, founder of SpaceX, shows a depiction of a human colony on Mars.
Elon Musk, founder of SpaceX, shows a depiction of a human colony on Mars. Photograph: Morgan Sette/AAP

This is not a wholly new phenomenon. At the 1939 World’s Fair, General Motors presented Futurama, an “artistic conception” that outlined their vision for the world of 1960. As Norman Bel Geddes, GM’s designer, wrote about the plans: “There is a Federal obligation to develop the country’s resources of land, water, power, and natural wealth. And there is no single undertaking more important to these obligations than the development of facilities for national transportation.”

By arguing for federal government investment, and building public consensus with the help of imagery borrowed from avant-garde artists such as the Italian Futurists, GM contributed to the public consensus that led to the 1956 interstate highway system.

However, futuristic ideas about remaking society haven’t always come from private companies with private interests. In the 1960s and 1970s, there were many visions of the future made by artists, academics and public agencies. Technocratic proposals gave form to many of the countercultural ideas of the time. The US navy actually approved Buckminster Fuller’s plans for Triton City, a floating housing development designed for 100,000 people in Chesapeake Bay, and it was commissioned by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Today’s privatized futures take directly from the utopian proposals of that era. Bezos’s space colonization plan, Blue Origin, nearly copies the work of the physicist Gerard O’Neill’s 1975 work for Nasa. However, the politics are much different. Silicon Valley’s libertarian, technocratic ideals – themselves a curious mutation of the California counterculture – could extend the darker aspects of hyper-capitalism. SpaceX wants to shuttle settlers to Mars for $500,000 a ticket, with loans available that could be worked off. Given the labor record of the tech industry, that sounds awfully like indentured servitude packaged as frontier life. (The MS Satoshi is also a cautionary tale of renderings v reality.)

We must envision more public-spirited, collective futures – ones in which the market alone isn’t allowed to dictate everything from housing to environmental regulation to mining rights. Like the futurists of the 1960s and 1970s, can we think in ways that are both stunningly audacious and democratic? At the very least, we have to try.

Like the seasteading movement’s difficulties in literally unmooring from the legal system, it seems that every “new world” contains DNA of the old one. European land-use laws defined the United States, which extended into the government-led expansion into the American west. Because someone today has to define tomorrow, it is crucial that we do not leave the image of the future in the deciding hands of tech billionaires.

  • Matt Shaw is faculty at the Southern California Institute of Architecture

Matt Shaw

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Of course billionaires like Elon Musk love outer space. The Earth is too small for their egos | Arwa Mahdawi
This week, Musk’s SpaceX will launch the first US astronauts into space in nine years. We’re meant to be inspired, but back on the ground the workers are struggling

Arwa Mahdawi

27, May, 2020 @6:00 AM

Article image
Rocket men: Bezos, Musk and Branson scramble for space supremacy
Experts say three billionaires have upended the traditional model for human spaceflight and are shaping a thriving new era

Richard Luscombe in Miami

12, Jun, 2021 @6:00 AM

Article image
The space race is back on – but who will win?
Alliances are shifting as states led by China and Russia compete with the US and tech entrepreneurs

Luke Harding

16, Jul, 2021 @9:39 AM

Article image
Space: how far have we gone – and where are we going?
Billionaire entrepreneurs are trying to create rockets fit for human travel, while government agencies spend billions furthering their explorations. But we are still a long way off from making our way to the red planet

Oliver Holmes

19, Nov, 2018 @6:00 AM

Article image
The tech billionaire space race: who is Jeff Bezos up against?
As Amazon founder prepares to jet off in his Blue Origin vessel, can he compete with Elon Musk’s SpaceX?

Alex Hern UK technology editor

07, Jun, 2021 @5:56 PM

Article image
Rocket men: how billionaires are using celebrities as PR for their space projects
Critics see the ‘awful business’ of private space tourism as having little technological or exploration value

Richard Luscombe

13, Oct, 2021 @5:00 AM

Article image
Richard Branson’s quest: to boldly go where no billionaire has gone before
Successful flight on Virgin Galactic craft would mark the next phase of space tourism race with Jeff Bezos

Jasper Jolly and Gwyn Topham

10, Jul, 2021 @6:00 AM

Article image
Bezos blasted for traveling to space while Amazon workers toil on planet Earth
Space-obsessed billionaires come under fire with the Amazon founder declaring the critics ‘largely right’

Adam Gabbatt

20, Jul, 2021 @9:00 AM

Article image
Nasa picks Bezos's Blue Origin and Musk's SpaceX to build new lunar landers
Alabama company Dynetics also chosen for moon landing project, as three firms prepare to compete

Stuart Clark

30, Apr, 2020 @9:44 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on space exploration: the final frontier | Editorial
Editorial: Travelling to the stars fuels scientific curiosity and inspires generations. The heavens are common property and should be open to all

Editorial

06, Oct, 2016 @6:18 PM