Britons should not face extradition to the US for alleged crimes on UK soil | Helena Kennedy

MPs claim to be appalled by our unjust and uneven extradition deal. But they still won’t change it

A decade ago I wrote an article for the Guardian about the fundamental unfairness of the US extradition treaty. Back then, British citizens risked being hauled before American courts over allegations of criminality in the UK. Politicians on the left and right issued condemnations. The US pressed on regardless.

Today, there are different cases, but substantially the same system with the same unaddressed problems.

In 2011 the computer hacker Gary McKinnon was the target. He had broken into US computer systems in search of classified documents about unidentified flying objects. American authorities, unconcerned about his diagnosis with Asperger’s syndrome, accused the would-be UFO hunter of intimidation and coercion.

Eventually, the then home secretary Theresa May blocked the extradition. But the government of the day, with its characteristically à la carte attitude towards human rights, did not address the fundamental issue: the extradition treaty itself. It remains, and so does the risk to any of us of being plucked from our homes on behalf of the US authorities.

This week it is the turn of the businessman Mike Lynch to try to fend off an extradition attempt. He sold a British company he had founded to the US firm Hewlett-Packard, and the two parties subsequently fell out. A British civil court is already considering the dispute, but the US insists on a criminal case on its soil. Lynch must appear before a judge to argue for permission to remain in his own country.

It would be wrong to say that nothing has changed since 2011. A measure known as the forum bar now exists. This enables courts to stop some extraditions – if they decide that a substantial measure of alleged criminal activity took place in the UK, and that it would be in the interests of justice for the extradition to be refused.

However it is no guarantee of success. Yes, the extradition of Julian Assange was recently refused, but on grounds that, were he exposed to what Americans euphemistically call “special administrative measures” in US prisons, his mental health would deteriorate to the point where he would take his own life.

What are those “measures”? The court was told about a prisoner barred from associating with other prisoners even outside his cell and from communicating with his lawyer via email. Long periods in solitary confinement are common. Little wonder a British court found that, given Assange’s mental health, extradition would be “oppressive”.

But the forum bar has not dissuaded the US. Its attempts to claim Britons for its justice system are as audacious as ever. We remain unprotected by our own government.

Despite all this, last month a Conservative minister, Chris Philp, rejected the case for making any change at all. Where a “grave injustice” was threatened, he said, then UK courts could act. With that, the House of Commons shut up shop for the day and MPs went home.

Perhaps the oddest aspect of this debate is its Groundhog Day character. Time after time the British public is shocked by the extradition system, politicians normally implacably opposed to one another agree something must be done, and the treaty endures. Why is that? Assiduous lobbying by the US perhaps, or just timidity?

The lack of reform makes looking back at my decade-old article on this subject rather wearying. Back then I asked why, if a case concerned allegations of criminality in Britain, the US should object to its being tried in the UK. The question remains unanswered.

For now, the best hope is simply that our courts can repulse repeated extraterritorial attempts by the US to forcibly remove British citizens. We should not have to live with the risk of undergoing that ordeal on the say-so of US prosecutors. Ministers must act. It would reflect a sorry political failure if I had to write another piece about an unjust extradition system in 2031.

  • Helen Kennedy QC is a Labour peer


Helena Kennedy

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Autonomy co-founder's lawyers attack 'overweening' US extradition effort
Mike Lynch’s legal team tell court US is ‘not the global marshal of corporate world’ and case should be heard in UK

Rupert Neate

09, Feb, 2021 @2:47 PM

Article image
Autonomy founder Mike Lynch submits himself for arrest
UK software entrepreneur contests extradition to US where he faces fraud charges

Julia Kollewe

05, Feb, 2020 @2:12 PM

Article image
Sir Menzies Campbell backs Briton's bid to avoid extradition to US
Former Lib Dem leader opposes Americans’ attempt to try Mike Lynch, the former boss of Autonomy, on criminal charges

Joanna Partridge

16, Feb, 2020 @7:00 AM

Article image
Refuse this extradition | Duncan Campbell
Duncan Campbell: Newly released evidence of hacker Gary McKinnon's Asperger's must persuade parliament to protect him

Duncan Campbell

16, Mar, 2011 @1:59 PM

Article image
Gary McKinnon extradition law 'not biased against Britons'
Scott Baker review dismissed as 'blatant whitewash' by mother of man with Asperger's Syndrome in US computer hacking case

Alan Travis, home affairs editor

17, Oct, 2011 @11:03 PM

Article image
Priti Patel, hear this loud and clear: Julian Assange must not be handed over to the US | Duncan Campbell
A decision from the home secretary is imminent. Extradition would set a disastrous precedent, says writer Duncan Campbell

Duncan Campbell

10, May, 2022 @9:46 AM

Article image
Gary McKinnon's extradition case must not be allowed to stumble on | Duncan Campbell
Duncan Campbell: America may feel bolstered in the wake of the Baker review, but Gary McKinnon deserves to be tried in the correct jurisdiction

Duncan Campbell

31, Oct, 2011 @7:30 PM

Article image
UK businessman loses extradition fight over alleged export of arms to Iran
Judges reject Christopher Tappin's argument that he was tricked by US customs agents in deal to ship missile parts to Iran

Peter Walker

13, Jan, 2012 @11:15 AM

Article image
European court rules extradition of alleged British jihadi to US was lawful
Haroon Aswat, who has paranoid schizophrenia, was flown to US last year after allegedly conspiring to establish a terror camp in Oregon

Owen Bowcott, legal affairs correspondent

29, Jan, 2015 @11:43 AM

Response: It's ridiculous to claim our extradition treaty with the US is fair
Response: The government must amend the law, to safeguard the rights of British citizens wanted in the US, says Fahad Ansari

Fahad Ansari

27, Oct, 2011 @6:57 PM