The Observer view on the pros and cons of deep-sea mining | Observer editorial

There may be merits to mining the seabed, but investing in alternative green technologies on land should be the priority

Deep-sea mining has become one of our planet’s most divisive problems. By stripping the ocean floor of its vast mineral wealth, proponents say we can obtain the cobalt, manganese, nickel and copper we urgently need for the green technologies – the electric vehicles, batteries and wind turbines – that must replace our carbon-emitting cars, power plants and factories. The only alternative to these deep-sea sources lies on land, where a huge expansion of mines would trigger environmental havoc: more sinkholes, devastated wildlife and polluted soil and groundwater. It is therefore time to plunder the riches of the deep to save our planet’s smouldering landscapes, it is argued.

These proposals are rejected outright by many scientists and green activists who say the colossal deep-sea dredging that would be involved in raising these minerals would trash swaths of ocean floor and wipe out precious, slow-growing animals and plants, while clouds of toxic sediments would be sent spiralling up from the deep, destroying marine food chains in the process. Deep-sea mining will only worsen our ecological woes, they maintain.

The differences between the sides are profound and highlight a critical global dilemma: how can we produce the metals we need to build a green technology without causing more environmental chaos? Can we afford to ignore the mineral bounties of the deep? If we do turn our back on them, we would at least protect one of the Earth’s last surviving pristine habitats. On the other hand, we might also compromise our ability to reach net-zero emissions by the middle of the century and find ourselves racing into a future where temperatures rise by several degrees celsius above pre-industrial levels. Devastation would ensue.

The world needs time to evaluate these competing claims. Environmental impact reports could be carried out, mining plans assessed and pollution risks calculated. We might achieve a better understanding of the risks and benefits of deep-sea mining. At the same time, engineers and entrepreneurs could be given a chance to develop batteries and turbines that are not reliant on metals whose extraction is linked with ecological carnage.

The problem is that the world no longer has that time. We have known for more than 40 years that global heating is a real phenomenon, yet national leaders failed to take action until the evidence became overwhelming a few years ago. The dishonest claims of climate change deniers, backed by major industrial and media concerns, have played a critical and shameful role in leaving us so badly prepared.

What is needed is urgent investment – private and public – in technologies that will address these issues. We must find materials for constructing batteries, solar panels and wind turbines without using resources that will lay waste to landscapes or the seabed and we must do this in the shortest time possible. Funding such work must be seen as a critical imperative. We can reach net-zero emissions and protect the environment, but only if such work is financed swiftly and comprehensively.


Observer editorial

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Is deep-sea mining a cure for the climate crisis or a curse?
Sea-floor nodules could fight global heating, but mining them may damage ocean ecology

Robin McKie

29, Aug, 2021 @9:00 AM

Article image
Deep-sea mining to turn oceans into ‘new industrial frontier’
Greenpeace report reveals 29 floor-exploration licences have been granted worldwide

Matthew Taylor Environment correspondent

03, Jul, 2019 @5:00 AM

Article image
The Observer view on the Tories’ shameful record on climate change | Observer editorial
Since the election, the government has performed a series of dizzying U-turns on its green policies

Observer editorial

08, Nov, 2015 @12:03 AM

Article image
The Observer view on space exploration and the perils facing Earth
There is nowhere we can appreciate our planet more than from out there

Observer editorial

05, Jan, 2020 @6:00 AM

Article image
Is deep sea mining vital for a greener future – even if it destroys ecosystems?
A new gold rush is targeting rich ores on the ocean floor containing valuable metals needed for smartphones and green technologies, but also hosting exotic ecosystems

Damian Carrington Environment editor

04, Jun, 2017 @12:00 PM

Article image
The Observer view on the school climate strikes: it’s shameful that children need to take the lead | Observer editorial
Children are right to call politicians to account over a global crisis

Observer editorial

17, Mar, 2019 @6:00 AM

Article image
David Attenborough calls for ban on 'devastating' deep sea mining
Proposed mining of seabed could destroy unstudied ecosystems and disrupt vital carbon-storing functions, says naturalist

Karen McVeigh

12, Mar, 2020 @4:56 PM

Article image
The Observer view on the government’s environment and obesity plans | Observer editorial
The Tory’s are putting the onus on consumers to save the planet. But it remains in danger with no ban on non-recyclable plastic

Observer editorial

14, Jan, 2018 @12:05 AM

Article image
UK’s deep-sea mining permits could be unlawful – Greenpeace
Licences given to arms firm Lockheed Martin said to go against government’s stance on exploiting seabed

Karen McVeigh

12, May, 2021 @5:01 AM

Article image
The Observer view on marine protection zones
Russia cannot be allowed to block this vital plan to protect the oceans

07, May, 2016 @11:04 PM