The Guardian view on post-Covid recovery: powered by the state not the market | Editorial

The Thatcherite wing of the Conservative party desires a restoration of ideas whose time has come and gone

The Conservative party hooked British capitalism to the state’s life support system for the past 18 months. So it takes chutzpah to think, as business secretary Kwasi Kwarteng does, of putting the free market at the heart of a post-Covid recovery. Yet lengthening NHS waiting lists, hiking consumer energy bills and welfare cuts when poverty is rising all betray a mindset that regards the re-legitimation of state intervention as threatening a way of life rather than securing it.

What the Thatcherite wing of the Conservative party desires is a restoration. For them this is an opportunity to go back to 1979 and use tried-and-tested ways to stabilise prices, crush labour and discipline poorer nations. These rightwingers yearn for higher interest rates, to prioritise financial returns on assets and the use of creditor power to squeeze the global south.

Such ideologues are likely, in part, to be disappointed. The US president, Joe Biden, does not see the world their way, saying this April that “trickle-down economics”, associated with Ronald Reagan, didn’t work. The president aims to show that the state can do good, and the early results are promising. His Covid-related aid boost will push the share of Americans in poverty to the lowest level on record. Mr Biden’s treasury secretary, Janet Yellen, professes a “free market” scepticism. She has promoted the social benefits of running the economy “hot” by maximising the use of all available resources. Her inspiration is the economist Arthur Okun, who in 1973 argued that governments increasing employment would foster “a process of ladder climbing” in the job market that would reduce inequality and stimulate productivity growth. Ms Yellen has stuck to this playbook in office.

Perhaps the greatest pushback against the return of laissez-faire dominance in economics comes from China. Beijing has surpassed the US in some key technologies. Mr Biden’s economic team is blunt about needing to use the state for more “targeted efforts to try to build domestic industrial strength … when we’re dealing with competitors like China that are not operating on market-based terms”.

The state is, clearly, not powerless against global capital. During Covid it paid for millions of workers without breaking a sweat. Contrary to conventional thinking there was no threat from rising deficits to interest rates. Thatcherism was defined by Nigel Lawson as “increasing freedom for markets to work within a framework of firm monetary and fiscal discipline”. This saw the state put in service of business interests rather than mediating between labour and capital. It also left Britain woefully unprepared, and ill-equipped, for the pandemic. A Thatcherite approach will not produce a fairer distribution of growth. It will militate against support during downturns and plans to “level up” the regions. Ministers ought to outline a new role for the state rather than relying on failed ideas about what the market can do.

Contributor

Editorial

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Guardian view on lionising Covid-19 workers: Johnson’s donkeys still fail them | Editorial
Editorial: Frontline staff deserve more than praise from the government. They need it to do its job

Editorial

27, Aug, 2020 @6:11 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Covid relief: ideologies matter in democracies | Editorial
Editorial: Within days of assuming power, Joe Biden had a plan to rebuild a Covid-scarred country. Boris Johnson has little to show after months

Editorial

07, Feb, 2021 @6:30 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on ending austerity: in rhetoric alone | Editorial
Editorial: If the Tories want to end austerity, they will have to focus on ending the lived experience of it

Editorial

13, Mar, 2019 @6:52 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the 2018 budget: austerity is not over | Editorial
Editorial: Austerity has been a self-defeating policy. It is not enough to abandon it in rhetoric, it must be dispensed with in substance

Editorial

29, Oct, 2018 @7:07 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the NHS and the election: money talks | Editorial
Editorial: The health service is in crisis and Tory cuts are to blame. But bigger budgets are not the only answer

Editorial

15, Nov, 2019 @6:25 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the EU and Covid-19: better late than never | Editorial
Editorial: Europe is in the pandemic frontline but unity among the nations has been rare. That may be changing – not before time

Editorial

24, Apr, 2020 @5:30 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Dominic Cummings: voting to leave | Editorial
Editorial: A departure from Downing Street caps a week of Tory infighting that has dominated the news at a time of national emergency

Editorial

13, Nov, 2020 @6:28 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the Biden stimulus: a historic moment | Editorial
Editorial: The White House is putting government at the heart of the post-Covid economic bounce-back. The implications affect us all

Editorial

14, Mar, 2021 @6:30 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on China, Xinjiang and sanctions: the gloves are off | Editorial
Editorial: Beijing wants to silence critics of its treatment of Uighurs. But the impact will be broader

Editorial

26, Mar, 2021 @6:51 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Biden and the world: undoing Trump’s damage | Editorial
Editorial: The president-elect will on the whole seek a return to the status quo ante – a relief to US allies

Editorial

15, Nov, 2020 @6:30 PM