The Guardian view on the cladding scandal: don’t punish the innocent | Editorial

Leaseholders didn’t build these high-rises and they didn’t certify them as safe. So why are they being landed with the giant bills to fix them?

If natural justice had its proper bearing, hundreds of thousands of people would not tonight be sleeping in high-rise homes that are clad in materials that could potentially go up in flames, a prospect for which they not only have to pay fire safety costs and higher insurance bills, but also face the reality that they will not be able to sell and move. Straight after the humanmade tragedy of the Grenfell fire of 2017, those flammable panels should have been stripped off flats across the land and families would be getting on with their lives. Instead of which, we have this week’s extended game of parliamentary ping pong between the House of Commons and the House of Lords, as they bat back and forth amendments to a fire safety bill amid a widespread sense of stasis.

Almost four years after 72 people died at Grenfell, we still have no reliable and regularly updated tally of how many buildings have serious fire safety defects. Instead, we have a smaller directory of buildings with Grenfell-style cladding. We have no official calculation of how much it will cost to make these buildings safe. Estimates put the total at £15bn; while the government has set aside a safety fund of only a third of that. That fund is off-limits to social housing providers, who must make do with a mere £400m between them. It is open only to private-sector blocks above 18 metres. Why a highly risky building of 17.5 metres doesn’t qualify, while a safer one of 18.5 metres does is a mystery, and a highly expensive one: the government estimates the cost to ineligible leaseholders could be up to £75,000 each.

Bills that size can push a family into financial ruin, and they are being forced on households who are in no way responsible for the safety defects of the buildings in which they live. All these people did was trust a system that failed them.

Also failing them is the Conservative government. In February, Boris Johnson pledged: “No leaseholder should have to pay for the unaffordable costs of fixing safety defects.” The prime minister is breaking yet another one of his promises.

It is galling to chuck £15bn of taxpayers’ money at fixing the work of property developers and their builders. But it is up to government to devise a way to finance the repair work and how to claw it back from a hugely profitable industry. Its best effort so far is a scheme to reclaim £2bn over the next decade.

Solutions to this are not simple, but they are obvious. First, Whitehall should publish which buildings are beset by what problems, how serious they are and how much they will cost to fix. Next, there needs to be a compact with mortgage lenders and with building insurers, to cover a greater proportion of homes. Finally, the government must accept that all leaseholders are blameless and should not be burdened with debt. Property developers should be compelled to pool together and fix the buildings. Those that don’t should be refused public sector work and named and shamed. If the Conservatives are serious about extending home ownership to more people, they need to be on the side of ordinary households, not property developers.

Contributor

Editorial

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Guardian view on the cladding scandal: rip off panels, not people | Editorial
Editorial: Ordinary leaseholders must not be expected to pay the price for decades of failed housing regulation

Editorial

02, Feb, 2021 @6:50 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on social housing: we need a cultural shift | Editorial
Editorial: The failure to provide adequate public sector rented housing in England is acknowledged across party lines as a catastrophe. A commission has put forward practical proposals

Editorial

13, Jan, 2019 @6:54 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Grenfell, two years on: the survivors’ campaign deserves results | Editorial
Editorial: Ministers should take more notice of the disaster’s survivors, who are right to say a new, proactive social housing regulator is required

Editorial

13, Jun, 2019 @5:21 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the Grenfell Tower inquiry: necessary but not sufficient | Editorial
Editorial: An obsession with deregulation of building fire regulations meant warning signs of looming disaster seem to have been missed on the watch of Conservative ministers

Editorial

20, May, 2018 @5:05 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Grenfell secrets: regeneration shame | Editorial
Editorial: Evidence of ‘offline’ negotiations and altered priorities is exposing the attitude of the authorities to the tower and its residents

Editorial

18, Oct, 2020 @5:30 PM

Article image
Commons defeat leaves flat owners facing huge bills to fix cladding
Amendment to fire safety bill could have spared leaseholders costs of up to £100,000 to make their homes safe

Robert Booth Social affairs correspondent

24, Feb, 2021 @6:54 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the Grenfell anniversary: sorry is not enough | Editorial
Editorial: Radical changes to housing, including improved safety, would be a fitting legacy

Editorial

13, Jun, 2018 @5:32 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on housing policy: Grenfell survivors deserve better | Editorial
Editorial: It makes no sense to delay reforms for renters and ignore the cladding crisis while embarking on a planning overhaul

Editorial

13, Sep, 2020 @5:25 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the Grenfell Inquiry: justice delayed | Editorial
Editorial: Confidence in the process was shaken before Covid-19 interrupted. But three years on from the fire, the campaign continues

Editorial

11, Jun, 2020 @5:39 PM

Article image
Don’t bring fake news into the search for the truth about Grenfell | Susanna Rustin
Blaming the media and activists for telling the wrong story is misguided – and does nothing for the victims of the fire, says Susanna Rustin, Guardian writer and editor

Susanna Rustin

08, Jun, 2018 @5:00 AM